MovieChat Forums > It Runs in the Family (2003) Discussion > sequel

sequel

posted 16 years ago by hillbrian2005
7 replies | jump to latest

I wonder how a sequel set at Hanukkah, since this one was set at Passover? I know this one wasn't good, but I liked it okay. They should do it quickly because Kirk is already in his 90's.

[–] Excaliburan 13 years ago

I would not mind a sequel taking 10-13 years after the first movie. It would be after Cameron leaves prison, of course. It'd be interesting to see how the Gromberg family has changed since then.

Perry: "You, stop multiplying!"

[–] hillbrian2005 13 years ago

I doubt Kirk will be living in the next five years.

[–] Excaliburan 13 years ago

The writers can figure something out without Kirk, should he pass before a sequel even happens.

Perry: "You, stop multiplying!"

[–] hillbrian2005 13 years ago

I guess they could still use Michael and his son and maybe just mention his parents.

[–] jrobles-106-996645 12 years ago

A sequel is practically necessary for this movie. Here's what I think should happen,

In the event of Kirk Douglas' death, (or if he's physically unable to do it.) Have his character die and the family coping with it.

I also want to know what happens to the girlfriend. Does she go to prison for the drug charges, or does Michael Douglas help get the charges thrown out, (since she didn't even know about the pot.)

I also would like to see more conflict with the youngest son.

[–] hillbrian2005 11 years ago

Maybe they could have Michael and his wife divorce in the movie since they had problems and have Catherine Zeta Jones play his second wife. That would be interesting.

[–] jrobles-106-996645 11 years ago

I think it would too.