MovieChat Forums > Luther (2003) Discussion > Luthor: A Great Movie

Luthor: A Great Movie


When you first think of historical drama films, a phrase often comes to mind—“low-budget.” Thankfully, when we watched the modern revamp of the classic film “Luther,” we were not disappointed in this aspect. On the contrary, we were enthralled by the excellent manner in which the characters were portrayed, and the ways in which the historical details of this period were presented. As we watched the film, we were able to feel as though we were really there, alongside Luther, with all his trials and experiences.

For those who have not had an opportunity to study in depth the events and characters surrounding the Reformation, the movie gives the watcher a great scope of the events in history. It also shows how the Catholic Church treated its members in those days, and hence, Luther’s actions in response. The acts of the Catholic Church including the selling of indulgences and the hypocrisy of its leaders were historically accurate as far as we can tell.

In the film, it was easy to see Luther’s malice towards the Catholic Church, which in his mind had strayed far from righteousness in many aspects. By the way the character of Luther was portrayed, we could see why this great man acted the way he did, in spite of possible consequences such as imprisonment, execution, or excommunication. The movie did an excellent job of portraying the actual character of Martin Luther, his feelings, experiences and thoughts, as well as showing the historical accuracy of the events in his life. Luther was shown being a man of great integrity, who did not stand by as he watched the clergy of his church take advantage of the general ignorant population. Interestingly, Luther, being the main actor, was not glorified in the way that is typical for many characters to be in many Hollywood films of our day. He instead was portrayed as the humble servant of God that he strived to be his entire life; yet, the facts and truths about his personal shortcomings and inner spiritual struggles, accented by the perilous circumstances in which he found himself, were not hidden from the viewers of this film.

A film such as this one stirs something inside of a man, and drives him to ask the question, “If I were to be in that situation, would I have had the courage to act as this man did?” We can all hope so.

reply

I liked it too. Just watched it the other night.


http://truville.myminicity.com/
rumrunnernews.com/

reply

That was a disappointment. I clicked on this thread thinking that a movie about Superman's archenemy was being made or was just released.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lex_Luthor

Noli vinci a malo, sed vince in bono malum.

reply

I seriously doubt that. You had to come here by way of the movie, or did you come here through someone's profile? At any rate, I think you're lying.

Trying to be funny, are we?

http://truville.myminicity.com/
rumrunnernews.com/

reply

Was it that obvious?

Noli vinci a malo, sed vince in bono malum.

reply

[deleted]

I wholeheartedly agree with your assessment of this film. I am a student of history, and I have this history class about the Reformation and my Professor is obviously not Lutheran or a Christian of any kind. The history he has described in this college course lines up with this film perfectly. Obviously, certain parts have been dramatized, but it is to no ill effect on the facts.

This was a great representation of history. Luther was a brave man and one who will never be forgotten because it is very rare that society can be spurred to change by a single man. There is absolutely no way to tell how many aspects of society the Reformation has touched; it's mindblowing to begin to ponder such questions.

I thought it was interesting how the film portrayed the German population's misunderstanding of Luther's teachings; I imagine it would have been very frustrating to be Luther in such circumstances.

I don't understand how anyone who has truly studied history could dislike this film, aside from perhaps nitpicking at aesthetics. I, for one, found the cinematography to be very well done (with the exception of that scene mentioned just after the Diet of Worms - that kind of rubbed me the wrong way, but perhaps it was supposed to do function like that?), and the acting was equally well done. I wish this film would have gotten more credit.

Great film (and I'm not Lutheran or Christian for that matter).

Bottom line: if you don't like studying history, especially the Reformation period and the circumstances leading up to it, and if you are a staunch Catholic who believes that the Pope is the Vicar of Christ and that such Popes as Julius II and Leo X were honorable men, you will not find much to like about this film or the Reformation for that fact. This is not to condemn you for your beliefs; rather, it is to forewarn you to avoid this film if you are opposed to varying viewpoints.

reply

Good posts.
lzac41, I agreed. You don't have to be a Christian to enjoy this movie, and you don't have to be a Christian to see the problems with the Catholic church and why Luthor wanted reform. People are flawed and sinners. I don't care who you are, when you have that much power over other people's lives, you will abuse it .

I'm your Huckleberry

reply

[deleted]

I agree with all of the favorable posts here; I feel LUTHER is a first-class film in every respect. I can't understand why it isn't better known.

reply