I have a question


Can anyone help, please? First, though; I really quite liked the film (seen in the UK on TV tonight). I didn't have a problem with the casting at all - young Silk is light-skinned and given that skin tones fade with age and Hopkins had grey hair, it didn't strike me as discordant and unlikely at all. Mostly, though, I thought it was sad.

Anyway, I must be thick because I just didn't get the significance of the final scene between the writer and the ex-husband. I'd be grateful if someone could explain it to me. TIA.

reply

I always assumed it was that moment when Zuckerman came face to face with Coleman's and Faunia's killer. After leaving him out on the ice, Zuckerman obviously called the police as the scene where Faunia's ex is talking to the woman about killing them was done either in prison or at an insane asylum after the story was presumably over with.

reply

I disagree ....... when the psychiatrist gave her report to the police she told them that the killer was totally dilusional, so from that I got that he wasn't charged with the deaths because of the doctors report and the fact there was no evidence

reply

I've just seen the film immediately after reading the book. The point of this final scene is that, although the ex-husband didn't get charged with any crime, the writer wants him to know that he knows what he did. In the book there's much more of a sense of threat to this scene - the writer knows that the ex-husband has picked up on the fact that he knows that he killed Silk and Faunia and gets really scared that the ex-husband might kill him before he even gets back to his car and shove his body down one of the holes in the ice.

reply

Thank God. I thought they were revealing that the writer was the ex husband's son, actually? Or that the ex husband was the real Coleman and... I was just confused.

reply