How exactly is this good???
I have to ask, because even though I am a big fan of low budget films, however, this didn't seem to be like a case of hard work with very little money, by a pssionate starving artist. In fact, it looked to me more like it was done with a regular cam corder from Best Buy, and then just turned into Black & White.
It wasn't even funny, nor ingenuitive, nor original in any way. I watched the whole thing until the end, hoping that there is at least something about this that would make me like it from some abstract alternative artistic angle, such as with the case of low budget Dark Star, or Eraserhead, but this seemed to be plain and simply BAD, and the only thing I could get out of this, is pretentious mediocrity.
In fact what it reminds me of, is what I think it really is, a Low Budget underground film made for that same low budget underground crowd, liked only by the in-crowd who knows each other from such productions.
However, I must be out of the loop, or just don't get it, because I sure as hell do not get, how the hell can a student like quality of a film such as this have the success that it has??? Yet so many really good quality films do not see the light of day??? How the hell do you explain this???
I see so much blackmouthing of good quality films on IMDB, yet this is "GOOD"??? Please somebody enlighten me. How? Because I'm either taking stupid pills, or the world has in fact gone completely crazy.
The fact that people will knock on good quality, yet appreciate something like this, just proves to me how much actual talentless bias pretentiousness there really is in the so called film community, or better yet, backing one another's mediocrity, against that mutual enemy called The Real Talent.