Here's my take on the two endings. About what you said about someone acting when their loved one is in deep trouble, well, while he was hurt, he didn't seem to be in any life threatening danger (clearly since he survived). The kissing him and grinding afterwards was most likely about assuring themselves that the other was alright and expressing the love they felt and the relief they had that the other survived. Such behavior isn't that uncommon. After a life threatening situation, people tend to need to assure themselves that their loved one is alright through displays of affections. I actually saw a movie on this a long time ago that was based on such a premise.
As for the directors cut, where it showed her just standing there staring at the ocean, I assume we were supposed to know that she was the only survivor. I think that what the director was going for was tragic irony. Kelly stated that for so long she hated Scott and his family and wanted revenge. Oliver was trying to give her the revenge he thought she wanted and the revenge he wanted for her, but as she fell in love Scott and learned the truth of what really happened to her mother along with Oliver's true sadistic tendencies, she decided that she didn't want revenge anymore and wanted to move on and be with Scott. However, her actions ended up causing the death of the only person left that she loved, resulting in her getting the revenge she originally thought she wanted. But she realized it too late and lost what she really wanted and is now left alone.
Personally, I like the theater version where they both survived. The director's cut where she's the only one that lives is just so dissatisfying. Not to mention it's only like 30 seconds long and leaves us with nothing while the theater version is a few minutes long, provides us closure, removes loose ends, fills in gaps, answers questions, and even has an epilogue.
reply
share