MovieChat Forums > Betrayal (2003) Discussion > ... got better, but too late

... got better, but too late


Erika Eleniak doesn't have much of a role until the last 20 minutes. Julie du Page is good, and carries the movie. The cast shouldn't include the kid. Instead, Erika could have a sister or girlfriend traveling with her.

reply

[deleted]

Julie du Page was horrible. Come on, she couldn't act if her life depended on it. She looked pretty nice though.

reply

Julie du Page was not horrible. Her acting may not be exactly oscar stuff, but I was too busy looking at her t!ts to care. She is one hot babe. It's Erika who can't act. She almost singlehandedly ruined the film. The kid was a bit lame, but not that bad.

reply

Horse hockey! Erika was so much better than Julie, she just didn't get enough to work with. There was a problem with the writing early on but it got MUCH better. Sounds like you were hypnotized by Julies' tits and missed the film. And p.s., Erikas' tits are much better!!!

reply

I think they both played their parts right, they just were in a film with poor quality and the writing was half decent.

reply