Why I liked the ending


The Killer was random... it could be anyone, somebody we saw in the film or someone just doing it for kicks.

Al was let live to take the blame and, killed men wasn't the killer's MO he was after women, the ones he video taped only... he/she only wacked that gack Rob in the head to put him on the shelf so he could nab Jane (who he was taping).

Heck, for all we know it could have been that girls boyfriend after all! I like the fact you just don't know.

What I liked about Saw was that at the end you didn't know what happen to Adam and Gordon.

Being spoon fed every little part of a plot is something I'm not into, have to guess what happens next why that happen is fine.

Everyone takes something new from it.

reply

True...

I like things that are left to interpretation. The reasons giving for murders in this kind of show are usual god awful anyway.

I'd chose this over 'I Still Know What You Did Last Summer' any day... and I love Jennifer Love Hewitt!

reply

Interpretation... I like that... you're spot on!

reply

I know it, brother!

reply

Why do we need to know every part of a damn film anyway? Huh? I think the end was a welcome change

reply

I 100% agree, man.

reply

As you should. I'm right after all.

reply

[deleted]

I really like you Mucky, I do! Forgive & Forget!

reply

[deleted]

Right back at you! Did your maid teach you that?

reply

[deleted]

Find then. If that's how you want to be, Mucky. Let's leave it at that then.

reply

Come on... it can't go down like that, man. She was kidding, you schmuck! You can talk to her later about it on MSN.

You two children, I swear to god! You'll be the death of me!

reply

[deleted]

don't say that.

you where still away to dinner when he was on earlier. I'm on now... call on to talk.

reply

[deleted]

no, don't say that...

reply

[deleted]

Than take it back!

reply

[deleted]

he does

reply

[deleted]

yes he does, are you calling me a liar?

reply

[deleted]

so it's like that, huh?

reply

[deleted]

no he's not.

reply

[deleted]

he's not cool eather... he an *bleep* *bleep* *bleep* *bleep* *bleep* *bleep* *bleep* *bleep*...

he also *bleep* *bleep* *bleep* *bleep* *bleep* *bleep* *bleep* *bleep* *bleep* *bleep* *bleep* *bleep* *bleep*

reply

[deleted]

does he like you?

reply

[deleted]

i don't think he does ether, you do suck... you know that though!

reply

[deleted]

1 2 3... awwwwwwwwww

reply

[deleted]

i think you will fine that is you who sucks, sister!

reply

the move was great... lets talk about that, huh?

reply

the movie was good, man, it was!

reply

[deleted]

David Nusair is a wannabe.

David Nusair is a loser.

David Nusair don't know rat sh!t from rasins.

I give him *out of ****

reply

[deleted]

I give you a half a * out of **************

That how much you suck!

reply

[deleted]

i hate you, mucky mudskipper... i hate you with all the hate a man can have... you are the pain in my ass the thorne in my side the vd in my privte parts.

your, ma'am, are the bane in my life!

reply

[deleted]

hey shut up, you evil cow!

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

ah, if only that where true, mudskipper

reply

[deleted]

Try this on for size......why did the killer bother framing Elwes' character when he then delivers the tape? Wouldn't that just be a wasted cover up? So now Elwes is set free? Come on, this just sucked and we all got duped into renting it.

BTW Elwes sounded like an English Robert Stack on crack.

reply

"why did the killer bother framing Elwes' character when he then delivers the tape?"

Cuz they're crazy! DUH!

reply

[deleted]

Anybody that likes this ending, I have a joke for you.

A priest, a rabbi and a donkey walks into a bar. The priest orders beer, the rabbi orders wine and the donkey........

Hey what's the punchline? There isn't one? Then what's the point of the joke?

Ohhhhhhh, a metephor.

reply

and the donkey falls over and the priest and rabbi get up to leave and the bar says, you can't leave that laying there. the priest says to him. "son, that's not a loin, it's a Donkey.

I *beep* on your metephor, wise ass.

reply

I guess three years ago I was much wiser than I am now. I don't even remember watching this movie. Glad you enjoyed it.

reply

"Being spoon fed every little part of a plot is something I'm not into, have to guess what happens next why that happen is fine."

But you are into regurgitating pretentious cliches apparently?

I like it when people actually bother to write endings for their stories. The ending of this movie was so lazy that they might as well have just finished off with a "THE END...???" after the package drops through the mail slot. There wasn't anything worth thinking about or taking away from it.

reply

saw this online.. makes sense.. hopefully someone will read it and comment back soon

Who committed the murders?

This is my reasoning.

1. It could NOT have been the British guy who confessed, because another video arrived after he was incarcerated.

2. It could not have been the intern acting alone, since we saw him being hit over the head with a hammer in front of the producer.

3. It could not have been the ambitious female reporter acting alone, since (1) we saw her being kidnapped from the laundromat by the stalker (2) we saw her being photographed in a secret lesbian rendezvous by the stalker, not with a tripod set-up, but by a hand-held camera, so she could not have done it herself.

4. All the bodies were found except those of the intern and the female reporter.

5. The disappearance of the intern's body makes no sense. The intern and the producer fell near each other, within seconds of one another. How could his body disappear, but not hers?

6. We never saw anything violent happening to the female reporter.

7. Therefore, I conclude that the intern must be alive and that he and the female reporter must have committed the murders together as a team.

* It seems certain that the killer's lair was her childhood house, for two reasons: (1) it was obviously a girl's room, filled with dolls and books about knitting and such (2) the block of small, identical pictures on the wall appears to be the actual, small-sized high school yearbook pictures of Rachel Leigh Cook, albeit with her natural dark hair color instead of the blond wig she wore in the film. (Rachel played the reporter.)
* The stalker's peeping, the complicated video set-up, and the need to photograph every moment of everything certainly seemed to match his behavior rather than hers.

8. I did not understand the significance of the killer's dog, who finally clawed his way into the house, then was dropped from the action altogether. It certainly seemed that the dog's behavior toward the intruders would identify which person really belonged in the murderer's house, but if that was ever intended in the script, it was abandoned in the final edit.

reply