MovieChat Forums > Slash (2003) Discussion > It wasnt that bad..

It wasnt that bad..

posted 21 years ago by phewBAR
16 replies | jump to latest

I mean, 2.5 rating... ? It was pretty much what you expect, mediocre slasher movie.

Movies like 'Valentine, Ubran Legends 2, etc' are in my opinion worse that this one.

5 outta 10

[–] KSLawDogg 21 years ago

I thought it was pretty good. With a few script revisions, finding some better actors (though not all of them in the film would need to be replaced) it could be pretty damn good. Then again, I watched this after seeing "Scarecrow Slayer", so maybe "Slash" just seemed better because I'd just watched the a truly horrible movie :)

[–] crazyaboutjacob 20 years ago

I thought for what it was it was well acted and the lead actor james o shea was great as mac.

Who would you have changed and what would you do to change the movie? Let me know? I'd like to hear your opinions

[–] MaggotShroom 20 years ago

I thought this movie was okay. The killer looked cool. The last song they sang in concert, was awesome. That "EIEIO" song. It kinda pissed me off by all of the offscreen kills, but the movie was still cool.

7.5/10

[–] TBJCSKCNRRQTreviews 20 years ago

Movies like 'Valentine, Ubran Legends 2, etc' are in my opinion worse that this one.

No offense, but what the hell have you been smoking? Those may not be great, but they sure as hell are better than this piece of cinematical garbage.

If you're too open minded, your brains will fall out.
Visit http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?AGB

[–] 20 years ago

[deleted]

[–] melanie_powers2002 19 years ago

I think this movie bordered on Parody rather than real slasher movie, it was funny as hell, predictable, acting terrible, etc, etc. For that it wasn't that bad...I can think of a lot worse that TRY to be scary but fall short because the plot is bad, the acting sucks, etc. (Texas Chainsaw Masacre the remake, HORRIBLE HORRIBLE and Blair Witch 2, Book of Shadows, HORRIBLE x 1000, the acting was SOOOOO bad, I mean have u ever seen any of those guys in anything else??? ya, my point) BUt what made this movie worth watching was MAC was YUMMY YUMMY especially with no shirt on! He can chop some firewood for me anytime!

[–] haden-1 19 years ago

agreed :D

[–] killasandwell 19 years ago

I have just seen this movie and have to say it's the worst thing I've seen this year and I've seen some really bad stuff.
I've seen better acting in children's school pantomines and I bet those same kids could do a better job of the plot too.

[–] animallover1980 10 years ago

I know this is YEARS later but the one guy from Blair Witch 2 was the star of his own show Burn Notice. I was shocked when I saw he had a show of his own and thought it wouldn't last but it was on for 7 seasons and I loved it :-)

[–] axedoff 18 years ago

Again another good low budget horror film that nobody likes. Okay acting, I didnt mind the kills offscreen because they arent really offscreen deaths, funny, not slow. This is NOT the worst slasher of the millenium. Everybody who hates this see Urban Massacre and then come crying.

[–] ShadySovereign 18 years ago

Yes, it wasn't too bad. But it's good that the rating went up

"It's just a little blood, guy" - Dan in The Dream Child

[–] ShadySovereign 18 years ago

Also, it might become a classic in about 15 years

"Jungle Man fix Jane" - Tina in A Nightmare on Elm Street

[–] jamie-62 18 years ago

Dont know what it was but I sensed a cult feel from it so who knows how it will be regarded in years to come?

[–] 18 years ago

[deleted]

[–] dogsoldier_spoon-1 17 years ago

I liked it, sure it wasn't a smart, scary masterpiece. It didn't have the best actors in the world. But it was fun to watch and I don't regret buying it.

x-men 4 script:
http://former.imdb.com/title/tt0376994/board/thread/69179793

[–] khazmir 14 years ago

I've certainly sat through worse. Also, it was refreshing for quite a few of the characters to have survived.