The Heist *****Spoilers*****
Will someone please explain to me the rationale for the guys betraying Milan at the end of the heist? It looked to me like Milan was the one at the safe getting all the money...so it's not like they made it away with money (unless there were some in cashier drawers.)
I guess maybe there is a backstory there that we will never know. Maybe Milan sub-conciously knew that these guys were going to screw him somehow. I just don't understand going through the whole rigamarole of a heist only to finger someone. And it looked like they got away scot free and weren't taken in by law enforcement. Usually if you cut a deal like that it's for a lesser penalty, not to get away without punishment.
Like others have mentioned, I think the ending was a damn shame to a finely nuanced character study. I think for writers the temptation to leave things unresolved or blurred at the conclusion, really just amounts to hubris. Like they're worried we haven't excercised our brains enough, so by golly they're gonna make us!
Comments?