MovieChat Forums > Absolon (2005) Discussion > Philosophical Questions concerning 'Abso...

Philosophical Questions concerning 'Absolon'


I rented this movie on DVD and while watching it i hardly couldn`t believe my eyes. While the movie played i surfed on imdb and checked the rating and user comments and was absolutely desperate. I said to myself: Could this movie be the most misrated one? Maybe for all times? World-wide? So i decided to start this new thread to explain evrything to everybody.
At first: "Absolon" is a very good example of a film which had a bad marketing. The movie is no sci-fi-thriller or so, it is a pure horror-movie. The subtext is as follows: Christopher Lambert plays a zombie, who is very sad, because he doesn`t understand how to handle his answering machine. Lou Diamond Philips plays a vampire who is colorblind and very jealous of his boss ("Ron Perlman"), which is a werewolf with a crush on bad smelling perukes. The female mutant-lead-role is executed by Kelly Brook: she is cross-eyed and wants everybody to believe she has four breasts and knows how to spell the word "molecule". The plot has almost no hole, which means: the plot consists of so many twists that you can`t hold your breathe . The script is very well thought of(considering the fact that writer Brad Mirman has written it during a rollercoaster trip in Disneyland) and the directing is exquisit, especially when you think of the fact that director David Barto passed his kindergarden-exam in 2001 with a B-. The intention of the producers was clear: while A-movies are too expensive to make, B-movies not proficient enough, why not establish a category C-Movie, so that everybody is disencouraged to do it even more worse? "Absolon" raises a lot of claims: 1.to invent the most ridicolous bad guys 2.to shoot the worst car chase in film history 3.to contain dialogues like before the invention of grammar 4.a showdown which can`t get downer than you will be, while watching it.
It`s definitively a must-have-seen for all who are waiting for their execution: The chances are very good that they won`t have to sustain the happy end, which is...but see for yourself.
The only question is: Why are the actors only faking they were totally stoned? I propose a remake with a director who has the courage to stone his cast really. What? They were? Oh....i, see.

I give that movie 100 out of 10.

reply



I think the question is, were you totally stoned when you typed this up?

Regardless, it was heaps more entertaining than this trashy movie, which was shot in Toronto solely because our government is so keen on throwing millions of dollars at movie studios to shoot here.

--
Eye for an eye Robinson!

reply

Actually StormShadow, the Canadian government doesn't have to pay anyone a cent to film here, they just do it on their own free will because it's cheaper than shooting in a city somewhere in the states.

reply

QUOTE:

I rented this movie on DVD and while watching it i hardly couldn`t believe my eyes. While the movie played i surfed on imdb and checked the rating and user comments and was absolutely desperate. I said to myself: Could this movie be the most misrated one? Maybe for all times? World-wide? So i decided to start this new thread to explain evrything to everybody.
At first: "Absolon" is a very good example of a film which had a bad marketing. The movie is no sci-fi-thriller or so, it is a pure horror-movie. The subtext is as follows: Christopher Lambert plays a zombie, who is very sad, because he doesn`t understand how to handle his answering machine. Lou Diamond Philips plays a vampire who is colorblind and very jealous of his boss ("Ron Perlman"), which is a werewolf with a crush on bad smelling perukes. The female mutant-lead-role is executed by Kelly Brook: she is cross-eyed and wants everybody to believe she has four breasts and knows how to spell the word "molecule". The plot has almost no hole, which means: the plot consists of so many twists that you can`t hold your breathe . The script is very well thought of(considering the fact that writer Brad Mirman has written it during a rollercoaster trip in Disneyland) and the directing is exquisit, especially when you think of the fact that director David Barto passed his kindergarden-exam in 2001 with a B-. The intention of the producers was clear: while A-movies are too expensive to make, B-movies not proficient enough, why not establish a category C-Movie, so that everybody is disencouraged to do it even more worse? "Absolon" raises a lot of claims: 1.to invent the most ridicolous bad guys 2.to shoot the worst car chase in film history 3.to contain dialogues like before the invention of grammar 4.a showdown which can`t get downer than you will be, while watching it.
It`s definitively a must-have-seen for all who are waiting for their execution: The chances are very good that they won`t have to sustain the happy end, which is...but see for yourself.
The only question is: Why are the actors only faking they were totally stoned? I propose a remake with a director who has the courage to stone his cast really. What? They were? Oh....i, see.

I give that movie 100 out of 10.


Poster andreasahlborn, you lost me at "I rented this movie on DVD."

Was the movie store out of decent movies to rent?

Well, at least you did not lease it with the option to buy.

Have Christopher Lambert and Dolph Lundgren ever made a movie together?

Now, that would really be a big train wreck.

They both need to go back to their respective homeland's and do damage there.

**************************************************
Ye Olde Sig Line:

Liberals kill with ABORTION.
Conservatives kill with the DEATH PENALTY.
I kill with THOSE and WORDS.

reply