MovieChat Forums > Project Greenlight (2001) Discussion > That is NOT what happened.. Of course pe...

That is NOT what happened.. Of course people don't iunderstand this..


So... there is a GREAT article with an interview with Jason

here is just one of the many questions, and Jason's answer.
and of course, the part that many people hated about Jason was
the issue about the location... of course it was edited
to make Jason look bad.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/style-blog/wp/2015/10/29/jason-mann-knows-what-you-think-of-him-after-project-greenlight-heres-what-he-has-to-say/


Do you think you bear any responsibility for the way things turned out during production? Especially with regard to picking a location at the last minute? That really seemed to set off a domino effect when it came to everything else — from permits for night shooting to how much time the production designer had to dress the set.



What they have right now in the show — this is kind of a complicated thing — but what they have right now in the show is the first meeting about locations and I decline them all and encourage us to find something else. What they don’t show is that we found some great locations and I was really excited about them.

I was encouraging us to film in Connecticut, where the film is actually set, but we did find some houses in Los Angeles and one of them was probably going to work out. Effie loved this place as well. We were both really happy with it. But they had one day that they were having a wedding during our dates and we couldn’t use the house on that day, and we already had such a short schedule that was going to be a problem, so we had someone who knew the homeowners go in and negotiate with them to see if something could be worked out. When they came back from the negotiations, the homeowners told us, “Okay, you can have it, but it’ll be $1 million.” Way, way beyond our price range [one-third of the film’s budget]. We had been pursuing this location for such a long time, and then suddenly it dropped out and we were left with having to be forced to go with a location that was somewhat subpar and required us to do a lot more heavy lifting in the way that we shot the movie. But in the show they make it look like I was procrastinating on the decision to do this and in my mind, that’s a pretty different kind of allegation against a filmmaker because being decisive is a pretty important trait really, especially when you’re dealing with time pressures and all of that. They really do run with an entirely different representation of the facts.





"for God's sake, can't a woman wreak a little havoc without there being a man involved?"

reply

They covered some of that in Inside the episode 3.

When he thinks "then suddenly it dropped out" it usually means he wasn't heeding what the experts were telling him was likely to happen. Getting his one-sided version about anything requires a lot of guessing on the readers part what the truth is.

He got film over digital after holding his breath and stomping his feet. Worst thing to happen to him, because he probably thought that million dollar house would "suddenly" change to $5 thousand as well if he just waited long enough.

reply

No you just can't accept that Jason isn't the quite incompetent moron that you've been saying he is for the past however many weeks you're way too committed to your hate to back down even a little bit.

reply

Can you reply without lying that I've said Jason is an incompetent moron.

Because if you remove your lying, then I might understand the point of your run-on sentence.

reply

You d*mn name is "Odds Are I'm Right." That describes that last type of person who's capable of providing meaningful arguments, criticisms or observations. I agree with 458 that you seem to be unaware of how emotionally involved you are, and how, while you think you're arguing from a rational position, it seems you really are committed to your hate (or your firm, unpleasant stance), however you'd like it said.



reply

You d*mn name is "Odds Are I'm Right." That describes that last type of person who's capable of providing meaningful arguments, criticisms or observations.

Your name is tyboulder. That describes a rockhead.


I agree with 458

You're agreeing with a liar, then. You should be proud.


it seems you really are committed to your hate (or your firm, unpleasant stance), however you'd like it said


Who peed in your cereal? 

However I'd like it said?? How about honestly, you jackass? That other twit - and now you - want to make an accusation of being hateful of Jason, then back it up with some sort of example, ffs. Which of course you can't, since it's not true.

reply

Right, now that that's sorted... 

reply

I know, right... 

reply

I hope that there will be more interviews from the members of the show along with Jason. Effie has been out for the past month giving her side of things. Now that the final episode is playing, along with the actual product, I hope some of the others will give interviews. Rashomon-style. I think Jason was unfairly portrayed as being difficult when he was just trying to do his best, and seemed to do a pretty good job on the shooting of the movie. The script may have been lacking, but given the time constraints to take a short film script into a full-length feature film, that is no surprise. And given its shoot location (100% union costs), its high production values (mansions, wardrobe, props), it seems to me like they did as good a job as one could do under these circumstances with this budget.

The episode from a few weeks ago (first called Hot Ghetto Mess then changed to The Pivot due to last minute deletion of a scene) prompted an interview from Effie in Variety, where she admits that she did something she didn’t agree with, and she decided to call Jason and apologize and try to make it right. I think it was whatever they took out of the episode, although it might be the fact that she said he was wrong when he told her that she said he could have the car crash the way he originally wanted it.

But she did tell Variety that she stood by her comment to Damon in the first episode and her interaction with Farrelly, but that “you’ve got to take ownership. What happens in this next episode, that’s not who I am as a producer. .... When I saw it I called Jason and talked about it and we’re going to meet later to smooth everything out."

reply

The show almost presented it like the location was locked one or 2 days just before the start of the shoot (I imagine that make very little sense).

I think many assumed that is was staged, all those scene with talking head saying : If Jason does not agree we will choose for him, and him agreeing without any fight was not that convincing acting on is part.

Same for the location for the stunt choose just 1-2 day before it, when you need a permit to close the street and everything. I guess that was also just part of the show.

I would also assume that all the film-digital drama was planned by the show, it is a nice one, a popular one, etc... All the previous greenlight project were shoot on film with smaller budget than this one, how could it become a big issue all of the sudden (and the show didn't show any issue with the film decision during the shoot neither) ?

I would imagine it is all for the tv-reality drama to make those seen as very last minute, when it is probably locked in advance to get thing ready in the reality.

reply

Yeah. Meanwhile, you have the location scout and producer Marc all saying on camera that it was because of Jason's procrastination that they had less time. So, I suppose that they're both liars.


".....edited to make Jason look bad."

Oh, GMAFB. Why would anyone want to purposely make him look bad. They're all there for him. This is his movie.



Sister, when I've raised hell, you'll know it!

reply

Of course it was edited for the purposes of portraying drama. I've never seen a reality show, except maybe for "Cops", that hasn't been edited in a way that was pre-determined to squeeze as much conflict and drama out of every episode as possible.

Smooth sailing and everyone holding hands and singing doesn't create enthralling television... at least not in the minds of most producers. I think that "Face Off" may be the only other reality competition show that I can think of off the top of my head that doesn't try to artificially amp up the drama. All of the contestants on that show have been consistently shown to be decent folks who actually jump in and help their competitors when needed.

reply

All of the contestants on that show have been consistently shown to be decent folks who actually jump in and help their competitors when needed.


ain't nobody got time for that

reply

The Great British Bake Off, I think the call it the Great British Bake Show on PBS. It also just shows a bunch of amateur bakers in a similar way. They help each other out their wasn't even any fights when some one took the wrong custard. My grandma in the UK says it's like appointment TV over there.

It goes to show that you don't have to ratched up the fake drama to make a compelling TV. Cuz everyone I have suggested Bake off to loves it and thanks me for telling them about it.

_____________
Shut it down

reply

Thanks for posting the link to the article. Good read. :)

reply