MovieChat Forums > Jonah: A VeggieTales Movie (2002) Discussion > Wouldn't it be scary of VeggieTalesGirl ...

Wouldn't it be scary of VeggieTalesGirl were real?


In the archived messages for this movie, there is a post by "VeggieTalesGirl". Please--God let this be some lonely old studio exec's grandfather who gets paid to pretend to be a fictional overly bubblegum Christian teenage girl. Because if theres really a person behind that name that actually is that excited about this film, I think that it's time for humanity to die.

"Excuse me, Mr. Pink, but I think the last f------ thing you need is another cup of coffee."

reply

I am a 22 year old professional, and *I* am excited about this film. Have you seen any of the half hour VeggieTales programs? On what do you base your disdain for this film? I have found VeggieTales to be a very smart and funny program that does exactly what it says - blends Saturday morning fun with Sunday morning values. All of my friends in college were skeptical, as well, but once watching just one episode, most were hooked.

I am so glad they are coming to the big screen!

reply

I too am excited about this film, looking forward to seeing it on its opening weekend. We've enjoyed each of the VeggieTales videos, gone to see VeggieTales live, and got out to buy the Jonah sing along songs , video and CD.
I'm 33, as is my wife, and our child is 3. And we're looking forward to Jonah a Vegggie Tales movie, we expect our child to be very happy with it. (our only fear is that at the end she'll say "again" and expect us to just rewind it in 10 minutes and start it all over again).
(Have they posted the website on this yet? More info is at http://jonahmovie.com/)

reply

The imitation of a young girl's posting style was too perfect to be a fake. That really was just some girl who genuinely enjoys VeggieTales.

And, in response to the Pro-VeggieTales set. . . let me tell you at length what my problem is with the entire VeggieTales concept.

I will hardly deny that the show is well written. I watched an episode of VeggieTales once myself with a few friends of mine, and we did laugh at some of the particularly entertaining jokes.

Then, as the show was reaching its conclusion, the morality came pouring out. . . and not in a way that was in any way necessary. Through the depiction of the characters, and the problems they had overcome, the necessary lessons in polite behavior had already been taught--and yet, then, at the end, for absolutely no reason, they started spouting some *!#@&$*MESSAGEBOARDCENSORSHIP**$ about how they needed Jesus for guidance. No, they did not need Jesus for guidance, they clearly solved the problems themselves, through their own compassion.

That is my problem with the show. VeggieTales would work just as well from a "teaching kids to do good things" standpoint without the spoon-fed Christian morals. There is a reason that I am a 24-year-old atheist who not only tries to treat other people with respect and kindness, but has never smoked, drank, done drugs, had sex, or done most anything considered horribly immoral to "good values" (despite many chances for engaging in all of the above): because I HAVE good values. Christianity is not necessary to teach kids to be good people, and I think it is counter-productive to associate the two. Religious intolerance's root lies partly in people's association of positive traits with certain theological beliefs. If Christianity is what you need for good moral traits, then a young child might think Buddhists therefore do not possess good traits.

I think I will stop there, rather than continue with this line of thought.

I will also now question what prompted me to go crazy and post this. Probably just because I have never really had the chance to rant about this, even though it has been a few years since I watched that episode.

There is probably no point in responding to this, especially since I am sure I will have forgotten I posted it soon and never look at it again anyway.

reply

Quarex, You're most likely not reading this right now, nor ever will but in the event that you do come back to check and see this board one last time or to any other fellow Christian Veggie Tales fans, completely off topic and setting aside the Veggie Tales subject(and I don't even know why I'm even bothering to say this, I guess I just couldn't get it outta my head)for a moment, I would like to recommend a VERY BOLD and unique little all American independent film to you called Frailty, now granted this IS or at least very loosely qualifies for a Christian film but please don't be put off by this fact, whether you're a Christian or not, I can garuntee you, that you WILL find this movie VERY DISTURBING, and it might even scare the hell out of you depending on how much you can tolerate.

As a Christian I'm not afraid to say that I did NOT like the ending at all!, however, it is one of the most absolutely terrifying and mind blowing thrillers that I have seen in recent years, and like Donnie Darko(though unlike Donnie Darko Frailty is nowhere near as excellent of an independent film from my point of view)is capable of attracting mainstream audiences as well as having largely Christian appeal.

You might even enjoy it Quarex, if you're listening, but I very seriously doubt it!, while the movie remains very mysterious and suspenseful up until the near the end its closure of revelations will leave many in disbelief and even left me not wanting to believe the terrible tragic truths of what were supposedly bullsh-it justful executions that I believed wern't so justful up to a point, and part of me still feels that there was just something wrong with that ending and it was all too warped to believe, and could have been so much better if the filmmakers had made at least one slight alteration.

Normally I wouldn't recommend a film like this to anybody, or especially to someone like Quarex, but I'm making the recommendation anyway just because I feel like it, and the movie may even possibly alter your perception a little or it might just make you hate Christianity even more, but try not to be put off by it too much or at least have a little patience with the seemingly endless psychotic fanaticism until the choping and hacking begins.

It seems ridiculous for me to make such a recommendation at the Veggie Tales but I am doing because I would like to hear the opinions of some fellow Christians on the movie Frailty, or at least hear what others have to say about Bill Paxton's directorial debut which was rather impressive in my opinion despite the fact that I found it to be very dark, downer and disturbing.

Frailty is the only modern American movie I have ever seen that dares to take a BRAVE and BOLD standpoint and one that dares to be so different from the average standard sissy American film.

And getting back to the main subject, about your problem(yes I'm talking to you Quarex!)with thinking Veggie Tales needs to be a standard societical moral slop "teaching kids to do good things standpoint" "without the spoon-fed Christian morals" in order to work, don't we have enough of those non-Christian childern's programs already! We have like 40 dozen of them on the stupid fu**in' Disney Channel and that pathetic network Nickelodeon along with
PBS, syndication and ABC saturday mornings alone, almost every last one of them are extremely annoying, irratating and sometimes just all out retarded!
So if you don't like or can't accept Veggie Tales for what it is then just watch a different show and stop picking at the fans for God's sake!

And on a further note, I'm not a real big Veggie Tales fan myself but my younger brother watches it, enjoys it and I do realize that there is some sophictated humor and mature jokes(not in any sort of offensive way)that adults and older kids can enjoy too!, and although my younger brother may be attending the Veggie Tales movie(if it ever comes to my town), I'll be at RED DRAGON this weekend!








Funny thing about escape, is that there's always a chance you might end up somplace worse.

reply

I'd just like to point out that I just saw Frailty and that's why I'm on these message boards... (saw Veggie Tales, which I love, so I thought I'd check it out...)

Anyhow, I'm a Christian, and I don't mean a "I-go-to-church" Christian, but a Jesus-loving-and-following Christian, and I thought Frailty was a good movie. But a disclaimer has to go along with that... it's not a family movie, and it is not meant to portray a true meaning of how God works.

Unfortunately there's people like Devowersez who think that this is actually portraying 100% true Christianity, which could "even possibly alter your perception a little or it might just make you hate Christianity even more"... I urge those of you with DVD players to WATCH THE COMMENTARIES by the director and the writer. This is of course a FICTITIOUS movie. It is based on the fictitious alternate "world" of "Frailty". While using religion as the vehicle for the writer's story, it by no means portrays Christianity accurately. (that's the only thing I'd have against the movie... because of people who don't fully understand it and mistake it as truth)

With that said, and from a strictly analytical and artistic standpoint, I thought this movie was intriguing because it keeps you on your toes as you try to choose which character is the actual protaganist and which one is the antagonist. You find out at the end of the movie what the director and writer feel is the protagonist (and I'd have to agree, partially), but although Paxton actually takes a stance, it is a stance that is strictly based on what the original writer wrote and not an actual religious standpoint. God is obviously not sending people out to kill "demons" who murder and such... those are sins, although very bad sins, God doesn't just kill those people because of them... that's why I'd like to think back to a guy who died on a cross... yeah.

And while you're defending Veggie Tales (I'm pretty sure you were), do ya think you had to use all those "censored" expletives in your "defense"? It really bothers me when people call themselves Christians but don't talk like Christians. Yes, we all have our own struggles, nobody is without sin, but I'd recommend reading a little James... but I technically can't say that without mentioning that yes I'm pointing out the "speck" in someone elses eye while I have a "plank" in my own... don't want to sound like a hypocrite at all. but i do encourage you to read James.

after that big long rant, i'm ready for bed, and, yes I must add, as a 20-year-old college student, I can't wait to go see this movie!

reply

Respectfully, let me remind you that this is the united states of america and we all do have the freedom of speech. what i am getting to is that quarex, while you are utilizing your free speech, i would like to say that i'm sick of it. i have no idea why christianity is so taboo in this country. we are taught as children to not stare or make fun of the disabled, homosexuals, the mentally handicapped, and most especially those of other religions. but everyone in this country feels free to slander our religion. quarex, we never forced you to watch veggie tales and i don't believe we ever will. so why are YOU acting so offended? you get all of the athiest and non-godly programming you little heart can desire everyday, so what gives you the right to tear down one of the VERY FEW movies alloted to us? who gave you the right to rain on our parade? you have to admit, we don't ask for much and we get even less and you feel the need to take even that from us. as for your reply, refering to spoon-fed christian morals vs. doing the right thing, nobody ever said you couldn't be a good person without God. that was YOUR misinterpretation because what we know to be true is you can't get into heaven without Jesus. after all that is the whole point: heaven or hell. you can be as pure as any of us christians without God or His only Son, but you cannot be saved. i'm sure you have heard it all before though so i won't go on about it. i just wanted to point out your mistake.

In His Name,
jcservant_2000

reply

[deleted]

This is all I have to say to you warren: Did you know that religion is based on belief? Christians like me believe this, sometimes from true experiences. I do agree that no one's ever actually seen it, but have you ever heard of the saying "sometimes things exist, even if you've never seen it." It's how us Christians see God. I'm not preaching or anything, but don't go trying to convince people the way to go. Let everyone decide themselves if there IS or ISN'T a heaven. We'll all find out if everything we've been told is true once we die. Case closed.

reply

First of all, Quarex, I just want to let you know that I'm not going to jump down your throat at all, so please continue to read. I'm a 20-year-old college student and think that Veggie Tales is truly an awesome program. It is funny, and it teaches morals. But I think the MOST IMPORTANT part of the program is the fact that it IS CHRISTIAN.

The question I have for you is: where do your "good morals" come from? did the good moral fairy come down and tap your head one day and bestow upon you good morals, or was it something that you learned? well, take a good look at where you learned it from. it had to have come from somewhere.

My point is this: good morals have their origin in the Bible. They come from God. Dispute it all you like. I'd really like to hear it. But you'll notice that in today's society as we get further and further away from the teachings of the Bible, (God help us) the morals have gone more and more down the drain. As people become more and more existentialist and care more and more about themselves and nothing but themselves, we find the "morals" that are made up by people. They go something like this: as long as I don't harm anyone, (by harm I mean kill) then I am moral.

While I truly love the fact that you follow the morals of a Christian, I tend to ask myself why? Why follow the rules that are supposed to come as the by-products of following the Lord, when you could be out there "living it up" by society's standards? You obviously don't believe in sin or the consequences of sin, so what stops you from sinning? (besides breaking the law) And honestly, that's not a rhetorical question, I'd really like to know.

Seems to me, that no matter how much you deny it, there's a reason you gave that you feel so strongly against hearing about God. You got a bad taste in your mouth somewhere along the way about Christians (gee, I can't imagine where you'd be able to find a hypocritical Christian out there...) and I'm truly sorry for that. But I pray that God still has a part of your heart, enough of it that you feel strongly about this kind of thing, albeit the opposing side, but why would you feel so strongly if you truly believed in the First Amendment and things that all the other non-christian tv shows for kids teach them are "good"?

I hope that somewhere in my rambling you caught my point, but I'm sure I'm not alone when I say I'll be praying for you.

sorry for any of you reading this who aren't Christian and are completely appalled that I mentioned "God" and "prayer", I'll pray for ya too! :-)

reply

forgot to mention my email address:
[email protected] in case you'd like to answer any of my questions in my post or ask me any further questions.

reply

As a fellow Christian, I hate it when other Christians seem so ...uneducated.

The bible is not the first place for morals. Religion and morals go way back before Christianity. Greeks, Romans, Buddha etc. The argument for morals is basic humanity, not created by Christians.

I will pray that you get some schooling.

reply

I am sorry, Yochimm, you have obviously not done your homework... ;-)
Buddism, and the Greek and Roman cultures, have been very recent compared to the ancient authority of the Bible. Some of the books that I would recommend that you read are Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus and Deutoronomy. While I do not pretend to know much about the religions of the Greeks, Romans, or of Buddism, I can honestly say that I believe that they are MUCH later than the time of these books. Please study these books-I would be interested in knowing why you believe as you do.

Respectfully,
A Christian Teen

P.S. Write me if you are interested in contacting me via email. I would be happy to explain why I believe as I do.

reply


As a librarian with a masters degree in history, I can tell you that you are wrong. These civilizations were here on earth before Christianity and the bible. Keep studying.

librarian

reply

Yochimm,
Before I start, I'm not attacking what you're saying, but for the sake of critics who could be mislead by what you stated, I'm writing this rebuttal.

Part of what you're saying is true, as far as the Greek civilizations being here before the Bible came to its fully-written form. You're right. I didn't phrase my statement above very appropriately as far as morals coming from the Bible.

However, the Greeks didn't come before the time that God was teaching his people morals. Let's harken back to the days of Noah. How about the Egyptian days. Greeks didn't even have their theology into place until after David ruled as king in Israel. Plus, they weren't all that moral either. For example, they thought homosexuality was just peachy. (I'll add that I don't hate homosexuals in the slightest. I just don't agree with what they do anymore than I agree that incest or adultery is hunky dorey.) So what about the Egyptians and Babylonians before Abraham and Joseph? Well, I wouldn't call them especially moral, but God was bringing up people from the survivors of the flood who would follow the morals he instilled in us all. Yes, I think there is a certain degree of innate morality. But I think the extent of that is that it feels bad to kill someone else. If even that.

As for Buddhism, well, that came only 500 years before Christ, which is right around the time that Rome became a republic, which is way after the Greeks. And I don't disagree that Buddhism has some great ethics, you go guys! but unfortunately, the "god" they serve died a loooong time ago. I'd rather be moral because I serve a living God.

Nobody can really trace our morals scientifically, just like we can't prove that we came from monkeys or that we were meticulously designed by a loving creator, and that's why we have these discussions! Isn't it great?

And I just want to thank the person who hated this movie and its morals so much to start this thread so that people like Warren and Quarex, et al can question themselves and let God knock on the doors of their cold, hard hearts.

Yochimm, it's great that you're a Christian and historian. I definitely don't have a masters, but I'd love to talk more about this with you if you are willing. Drop me an email. ([email protected])

reply

I'm sorry, yochimm, but you are mistaken. As a Christian librarian with a masters in history, I would think that you would have read Genesis. For one, Genesis has the first two people (Adam and Eve), how could the first two people have lived after any civilization? And isn't Genesis where God made morality? Read Genesis 3 and 6:11-12. How can there be sin without morality?

Take Sumer, the first civilization, which started at roughly 3500bc. I believe in a young earth (6000yrs). It is now 2005ad. Jesus was born in 8bc, as I recall, but I may be a couple years off. Adam and Eve lived in 4000bc. That's 500yrs before Sumer.

This is your life, are you who you want to be?
~Switchfoot

reply

[deleted]

The Veggie Tales videos never mention Jesus. I don't know if you made the whole story up or if you just don't remember very well, but that simply didn't happen. Big Idea has made a point of producing Biblical, though not specifically Christian, videos. As you said, you may never read this, but in case some Veggie newbie stumbles upon your message, I just wanted to set the record straight.

reply

Yes, Veggie Tales mentions Jesus. Check out "The Toy that Saved Christmas". It tells the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

reply

Thank-you! I knew they HAD to mention Jesus. I just couldn't pin point it.

reply

I stand corrected. However, this really doesn't affect the point I was trying to make. That video tells that the birth of Jesus is the real meaning of Christmas, but Quarex was claiming that:

"for absolutely no reason, they started spouting some *!#@&$*MESSAGEBOARDCENSORSHIP**$ about how they needed Jesus for guidance. No, they did not need Jesus for guidance, they clearly solved the problems themselves, through their own compassion."

and, as my subject so concisely stated, "no they didn't." He was using a false argument to try to speak ill of the series.

Now, from a Christian perspective, since Jesus is God and they mention God frequently, they essentially mention Jesus (though not in name). Of course, you can't even say the word Christmas without mentioning Jesus by his title, and a Biblical series that would bother to make a Christmas episode without at least a veiled reference to the Christ would be pretty hypocritical. But the VeggieTales videos don't end with the characters saying they couldn't have done something without the help of Jesus. Besides alienating a huge part of the potential audience, the whole idea of getting guidance from Jesus to solve a problem is a little over the heads of so many of the children who watch the series.

I doubt that Quarex was talking about the Christmas episode, anyway, as he said they started talking about Jesus "for absolutely no reason." Even the most anti-Christian cynic would have to admit that a mention of Jesus in telling the story of Christmas is not without reason.

Again, the whole reason I posted a response in the first place was to set the record straight. Although it would be unlikely, I would hate it if someone who would be turned off by explicitly Christian messages, and didn't know much about VeggieTales, came by this message board and saw Quarex's comment, thereby being forever turned off to an amazing, inspiring series. I apologize for my poor choice of words.

reply

Hey Quarex,

The very fact you take such time to "weigh in" on such matters that you say you could care less about or respond to a group of people that you could care less about proves that God is real, the Bible is indeed His inspired Word, and that the historical and factual depiction of Christ being born, crucified and raised from the dead is God's one and only opportunity he has given his creation, mankind, to be reconciled back to him and allow them to spend eternity with Him.

Deep in your heart of hearts, you know this to be true. That's not me saying that, God has said that. The Bible states that "He has made himself known to all mankind...", meaning that you were created with an innate sense that there is in fact a power greater than you. It's in all of us. Some of us just choose to ignore it all our lives. We surpress it, but it's there. We have sought out a greater power since the dawn of civilization. We have tried to fill that void with all kinds of stuff. Money, power, sex, careers, family, drugs, alcohol, you name it. We've tried to fill that void, that gap. Nothing or no one on this earth can fill it.

Richard Dreyfus in an interview several years ago stated that he has spent his entire life building, seeking, climbing, conquering and after years and years of perfecting his abilities and finally getting to the top, making millions of dollars, winning every accolade known to his profession, gaining the respect of millions of people, seeing the world, dancing with Princesses, having dinner with Presidents, reaching the absolute highest point and accomplishing everything he ever dreamed of doing....there was a void. He was empty. He became so depressed to finally realize and ask "is this it?" "is there nothing more?"..."He has made himself known to all of mankind..."

The fact is, that here on this earth, that is all there is. There is nothing more. You know it. God is knocking and has been all your life. He has a plan and a purpose for your life. The apostle Paul was a Christian hater and killer. His life goal was to rid the world of Christians and once he realized and found what you are looking for, God saved him and used him to set the world on fire for Him and used him to spread the gospel of Jesus Christ and call people back to him for eternity.

We are separated from God. There is only one God, one creator. That fact, like it or not, is built in to every single human being's minds and souls. Deep down we know its true. God tells us, not Christians, but God tells us, in his Word, that there is only one way to Him. The "if it feels good, do it" culture tells us that there are many paths to God and everyone's road eventually leads us to him. If we are good. If we don't kill, lie, steal, help others. If we just do enough here on this earth, then we can earn our spot with God and spend eternity with Him. THAT'S A BIG FAT LIE, QUAREX!!! Why do you think they call Satan, the Liar and the Deceiver?

We can't earn such a Gift. We don't deserve it. Nothing we can do to buy it, steal it or own it. We just have to believe.

God tells us in His Word, that there is only ONE way to him. We can't earn our way into Heaven no matther how good we try to be, how many people we try to help, no matter how much money we give away, it is something that simply cannot be earned or bought. There is nothing we can do to earn it. The Bible says "I am the truth and the light, and that NO ONE comes to the Father except by ME."

Pretty intolerant isn't it?! The Bible also says that at some point in time, no matter who you are or what you believe or what your status or circumstances in life are, that "every knee shall bow and every tongue shall confess that I am Lord". We all have a decision to make. Those who have confessed it and believed it before their death or before His return will spend eternity with Him. At some point in time, those who do not know Him will also confess it and bow to Him, but that won't be from a result of their own free will. They will be confessing that they were wrong. Why wait?

Don't let some Christian's hypcrosy get in your way. That's Satan's way of keeping you right where he wants you, with him. We are human beings and not perfect. But, we are forgiven. As are you. If you'll just ask. Your running or hiding from something. You probably feel like your'e not good enough or that you've never done anything worth God using you. Those are lies.

I'll leave you with this. Check out one of our country's most staunchest Atheist's journey in his several year research project to disprove and discredit the existance of God and prove that Jesus was just a fictional character. As an investigative reporter for the Chicago Tribune, Lee Strobel set out to disprove once and for all the myth of Christianity. He was just like you, a self proclaimed athiest. The book is titled "The Case for Christ".

Go buy it. He's knocking, Quarex. You know He is knocking. Fill that void in your life. Don't wait until it's too late. What if you are right? What if there is no God? What if God did not come to earth as a man to set us free of our sin and allow us to come back to Him for eternity. Then you know what? Christians have nothing to lose. But what if you are wrong? Don't find out too late. Our little lives here on earth don't even register as a spec in the span of time. Eternity. That's what you are searching for...

reply

[deleted]

I know I'm pobably gonna be blasted for saying this, but I grew up around Christains and went to a Catholic school, and I find Christains to be VERY stuck up, with their "I'm Christain so I'm better than you" and "All Buddhists go to hell" attitudes. And no one wants to be stuck-up, so you better go easy on Quarex. Just because they have different beliefs doesn't dictate their future. We'll never know until we're dead what's gonna happen to us. AND YOU DON'T so don't say you do. I'm kinda Agnostic, and some of the stuff in the bible very much defies my idea of a loving father. In fact, I bet a bit of that's faked. It's just too late to tell. There's a lot of sextism, so I don't believe God wrote the bible (HOLD YOUR FIRE) but that's just MOHO. And Quarex, you should keep an open mind. As well as the rest of you. Even Buddhists are kinder than a lot of you.

###############################

From under the big green light

reply

[deleted]

bump

keeping this thread alive, I knew my poorly thought out words would come back to haunt me someday, I have matured quite a bit since then.

I will respond with a retractment soon, when I can think of a good one.

This is oldest thread on my account I can't believe it has lasted this long.

I just randomly finally decided to update it today.

reply

I have not read the archived message in question, but it wouldn't suprise me that someone is excited about the movie. I have two boys who just love Veggie Tales, especially Larry Boy. They have been asking me since last fall when this movie was going to be in the theaters. We will probably be in line on Friday afternoon here in Hollywood with a ton of other parents.

For anybody who hasn't seen a Veggie Tales video they are kids videos that are very funny, have great musical numbers, and teach kids about Bible stories. Now I will admit that some videos are better than others. I personally think that the best ones are "Dave and the Giant Pickle", "Ester", "Rach, Shack, and Benny" and "Josh and the Big Wall." They also have a second series about Larry the Cucumber where he plays a super-hero named Larry Boy. These videos are not based on Bible stories, but still teach kids important moral lessons such as not spreading rumors . The best video in this series is "Larry Boy and the Rumor Weed." You should advoid the cartoon version of Larry Boy, at least the first one, "Larry Boy and the Angry Eyebrows." They are not done by the two original creaters and they lack the creativity and humor of the computer animated series. They remind me of a bad Saturday morning cartoon, but with a Christian theme.

I really hope the Veggie Tales movie, "Jonah", is good. We need more good and wholesome movies that we can take our kids to.

reply

They have one running series of the 3D programs including biblical, nonbiblical(Toy that Saved Christmas, Star of Christmas, Lyle the kindly Viking, AND THE 3D LARRYBOYS, etc.)The 3d Larryboys(Fib from outer space and Rumor weed) are part of the main series. They spun off a 2d computer animated series with Larryboy that is largely being run by another company, while they do the animation (like 3-2-1 Penguins), but the creators are involved in the spinoff Larryboys. Phil Vischer still does Bob the Tomato and Archie Asparagus, Lisa Vischer still does Junior Asparagus, and Larryboy, the star, is still voiced by Mike Nawrocki. The tackiness and overplayed drama is part of the humor (I think).

Jonah was great. Don't let it pass you by.

reply

I unfortunately haven't seen the movie 'Jonah' yet. I plan to, actually, in two days, but I have been looking forward to it. Ever since, in fact, they began advertising it on the home videos. I am a fully-functional 18 year-old, first year college student. I am mature, have good morals, and wouldn't consider myself a very religious person, at all. But, I enjoy Veggie tales. And I give HUGE kudos to Big Idea productions, who have brought what they believe out into the world with a kick of comedy and a HUGE dose of cute. I have seen people from age 2 to age 100 ENJOY veggie tales. And no, I'm not only talking about christians.

Would it be scary if Veggie tales were real? Hmmm... I don't know that'd I'd enjoy a mega-dandilion in my town, or my salad to start singing about water buffalos.... But theses veggies have kick, morals, compassion... More than most of the world. So perhaps, if veggie tales were real, the world would be a better place.... But for now, at least we get a laugh, and a thought to ponder from them....


reply

I've been fascinated by the exchange of ideas emanating from the "Wouldn't It Be Scary if Veggie Tales Girl Were Real?" tirade. Given the nature and passion from both Christians and atheists, the Spirit of God is working on the souls of movie fans because of this movie. I came across another, more articulate perspective about the Veggie Tales industry and the purpose for the movie at www.christiantheatrenetwork.org. Click on either "A Veggie Tales Movie" or "Mike's Memo." Pretty good reading. And, yes, so is the Book of James.

reply

I never heard of them, until I walked into blockbuster, and my kid sister wanted to see it. I rented it, and I thought the movie was pretty good.

reply

Hi guys - wow, heated debate, one that kind of riled me up. About the whole Christianity/ Buddhist/ good morals debate thing, to me it makes sense that Christianity is right. For one, people who follow God's word are only going to be better off for it. Oh, you might miss out on a decade of drinking your life away and what have you, but really it gives you a positive feeling that someone loves you, even when you do wrong things, even when maybe your parents may turn their backs on you. What can be wrong with that?

Also, the way I figure, it not only teaches respect, compassion, love and fairness, surely it's gotta be tons better than the alternatives. You can believe in nothing - well great, what's the point of your life? You can believe in Evolution - ok, so we evolved from monkeys, not quite as special as being lovingly created by someone. Islam - oppresses women, gives men all the power in the world, teaches that everyone should be a muslim whether they want to or not, take over everything with force. Christianity is a choice, God gave us free will, he gave us freedom. That's pretty decent of him I think, unlike believing we are merely slaves to our animal instincts.

Also, if you look at the world , the countries that have flourished, are the Christian ones. England, America - all founded on Christian principles. These morals are Christian whether you like it or not, they are not taught in Greek religion; look at the way men killed men throughout generations in revenge. And they are Christian principles because man is not innately moral at all - read William Golding's book The Lord of The Flies, that was the point he was making.

And one final point that's maybe a little on the pessimistic side but never mind. You have to live your life by rules of some sort, whether they are self-imposed morals to varying degrees, or the morals written about in the Bible. We can never honestly know what will happen when we die, but no matter what it is, a whole lot of people are going to be really screwed because we all have such varying beliefs. It makes sense to believe in Christ because if you die and it's true, then hoorah, you're in Heaven for eternity. If you believe and it's not true and there's absolutely nothing after death, you're simply...dead, then who cares that you 'wasted' your life on God? It's hardly a waste if you really followed His word, because it teaches all those good things I listed earlier. You'll no doubt be a happier person when you die because of it. But if you refuse to believe, and the Bible is right, then obviously that's not gonna be good! So it makes sense for a whole bunch of reasons that I listed at length there. Man, I just graduated high school, what am I doing writing another essay?! :)
Ciao.

reply

have you ever heard of the crusades? christians killed thousands of innocent people just because they werent christian- and thats how they became so powerful in the first place.
have you read the ENTIRE bible? ill show you some quotes that arent so nice.

Dt 13:13-17
'If you hear that in one of the towns, there are men who are telling people to go and worship other gods, it is your duty to look into the matter and examine it.'
'If it is proved and confirmed, you must put the inhabitants of that town to the sword.'
'You must lay the town under the curse of destruction, the town and everything in it.'
'You must pile up all its loot in the public square and burn the town and all its loot.'

we are both young women, and as an ex-christian, i urge you to read the bible more carefully for you to see how sexist it is!
quoted from exchristians.net:

Any honest, thinking person reading through the bible cannot ignore the blatant misogyny and barbarity towards women. The eminent 'men of God" who wrote the bible were the product of patriarchal, tribal, violent, intolerant, monotheistic society. They reflect the ignorance and brutality of that society and at the dawn of a new millennium, fundamentalists insist that we should all abide by biblical law.

It is no accident that from the very beginning the bible cements women's inferior status. In 1Timothy 2:11-15 we are told that women are not permitted to have authority over men and that they must be silent because Adam was formed first then Eve.

Consider this: when God created all the animals he made male and female together. Then he created Adam. Adam was alone in the Garden of Eden, so God puts Adam to sleep, extracts one of his ribs and out of that single rib creates Eve. Even before the fall woman is accorded inferior status by deliberately being created after Adam instead of being created together. Why would an all-knowing God create man first then woman, shouldn't he have known that Adam would need a partner?

Anyway, God places Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden and permits them to eat the fruit from all the trees but one - the tree of "knowledge"! The serpent, a wise and knowing creature approached Eve and suggested that she eat from the forbidden tree. When Eve saw that the fruit was desirable for gaining wisdom, she took some and ate it - it is no surprise that Abrahamic religions value ignorance as a virtue for women. Adam is exonerated from sin since it was the woman who led him astray. Perhaps Adam would have been better off with an inflatable doll rather than a real, thinking woman!

Calvin declared:

"Woman is more guilty than man, because she was seduced by Satan, and so diverted her husband from obedience to God that she was an instrument of death leading to all perdition. It is necessary that woman recognize this, and that she learn to what she is subjected; and not only against her husband. This is reason enough why today she is placed below and that she bears within her ignominy and shame."

Eve was punished severely for her attempt to gain knowledge, for disobedience and for exerting independence from her husband. I will greatly increase your pains in childbearing... Your desire will be for your husband and he will rule over you." Genesis 3:16. In accordance with God's command, some fundamentalist sects forbid painkillers during childbirth.

Some years ago I had a heated discussion with a Greek Orthodox woman regarding the subject of women priests. She claimed that women should not and could not become priests because of their monthly unclean state - they would defile the altar. Her view summed up the biblical contempt for women's bodies and natural functions (also shared by Islam and Judaism) There are several verses in the bible that emphasise women's uncleanness.

"A woman who becomes pregnant and gives birth to a son will be ceremonially unclean for seven days, just as she is unclean during her monthly period. On the eighth day the boy is to be circumcised. Then the woman must wait thirty-three days to be purified from her bleeding. She must not touch anything sacred or go to the sanctuary until the days of her purification are over. If she gives birth to a daughter, for two weeks the woman will be unclean, as during her period. Then she must wait sixty-six days to be purified from her bleeding. These are the regulations for the woman who gives birth to a boy or a girl. She is to bring two doves or two pigeons, one for a burnt offering and the other for a sin offering. In this way the priest will make atonement for her, and she will be clean." Leviticus 12: 1-8

If a woman gives birth to a girl she is unclean for twice as long.

"When a woman has her regular flow of blood, the impurity of her monthly period will last seven days, and anyone who touches her will be unclean till evening. … If a man lies with her and her monthly flow touches him, he will be unclean for seven days..." Leviticus 15:19-32.

“Man born of woman…Who can bring what is pure from the impure? No one!” Job 14:1-4

In some denominations women are still considered unclean during their menses. E.g. in the Greek Orthodox church women who have given birth attend church forty days after the birth to make amends for their uncleanness and be declared clean by the priest. Young women are still exhorted by their mothers and mothers in law to bow to this insulting and demeaning ritual.

The words whore and harlot are used frequently in the bible to describe women who deviated from the double standards sexual moral code. Women's bodies were not their own but the property of fathers and husbands. Virginity and chastity were mandatory for women and any woman breaking the double standard moral code was put to death. Under Mosaic Law men were permitted many wives while women were permitted only one and were subject to a test for unfaithfulness - Numbers 5:11-31. Men could divorce their wives on a whim - Deuteronomy 24:1-4. Women's main role was to bear male children and infertile women were scorned. In the bible it was always the women who were sterile, never the men.

“…If however the charge is true and no proof of the girl’s virginity can be found, she shall be brought to the door of her father's house and there the men of her town shall stone her to death..." Deuteronomy 22:13-21.

Cultures, which demand virginity and chastity in women, have as their bedrock the double standard morality code. If men are encouraged to view women as depreciative chattels they will never regard them as human. And if women are not regarded as human, then all kinds of atrocities and injustices are permissible against them!

"For man did not come from woman, but woman from man; neither was man created for woman, but woman for man. For this reason, and because of the angels, the woman ought to have a sign of authority on her head;" 1 Corinthians 11:9, 10.

“…women should remain silent in churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission...” 1 Corinthians 14:34

“Wives submit to your husbands, as is fitting to the Lord.” Colossians 3:18

Polygamy still exists amongst fundamentalist Mormons and certain sects. A fundamentalist group in America instructs women to call their husbands MASTER and to practice the art of being a SLAVE. Various fundamentalists exhort wives to submit and obey and have embarked on a chastity crusade targeting young women.

Today the religious right still uses the bible as a manual for the enslavement of women and persecution of homosexuals. Not only is the bible infested with sexism, but violence and obscenity also abound. Under the guise of "family values", the religious right is fighting to reverse all the gains made by women: the right to own property, the right to tertiary education, the right to work, the right to childcare, the right to vote, the right to plan their families, the right to equal wages, the right to enter politics and above all the right to sexual autonomy.

In the Roman Catholic tradition the Virgin Mary is held up as a role model for women. She symbolizes female "virtues" such as obedience, submission, chastity and silence. In fervent Catholic countries, Catholic women are encouraged to emulate her. In fact the more women submit and self-efface themselves the more they are praised for being “good” Christian women. The Roman Catholic Church glorifies one woman while it rubbishes all the rest.

The "glory" of motherhood is constantly drummed into women with the intent of preventing them from doing anything else. At the same time the bible emphasises women's uncleanness after childbirth, and states that we are all born sinful. Even Mary had to make a sin offering after the birth of Jesus.

Women should beware of campaigns to enshrine "God's Law" and "family values" into secular law. Whenever "family values" and "god's law" are mentioned, the little alarm bells inside my head start ringing loudly!

It is time women saw the bible for what it is: a man-made, primitive "revelation"! No woman with a shred of self-esteem would want to demean herself by bowing to such tyrannical and self-effacing absolutes. Every time a woman submits to such demotion she throws away her sell-worth. Women's self-worth is anathema to fundamentalists who accuse women of being selfish and ungiving.

Some Christian apologists claim that sexist biblical verses are a reflection of Hebrew society of that time and that Jesus Christ was a reformer who endeavoured to improve the status of women. They point to Proverbs 31:10-31 describing the virtues of a good wife - hard working, intelligent while implying that such women are so rare that their price is more than the price of rubies. On the other hand, fundamentalists invoke sexist verses in order to deny women their rights. In the US, Reconstructionists dream of doing away with the constitution and enforcing their own version of "God's law" based on the Old Testament. They advocate the death penalty for adultery, homosexuality, witchcraft, blasphemy, unchastity and sacrificing to "false gods".

Despite apologists attempts to "white-wash" the bible with a litany of excuses, it does not change the fact that the bible is anti women.

I urge you not to take my word for it but to check it out yourself. Here are some more biblical "gems" to look up:

GENESIS

2:22 Eve created from Adam's rib.
3:16 Cursed with painful childbirth and domination by husband.
4:17 Cain marries sister?
4:19 Man marries two wives.
12:13-19 Abraham prostitutes wife.
19:1-8 Rape virgin daughters instead of male angels.
19:26 Lot's wife turned into pillar of salt for disobeying god.
19:30-38 Lot impregnates his two daughters while drunk. (So much for "family values"!)
20:2-12 Abraham prostitutes wife - again.
25:1-6 Keeping many concubines is OK.


EXODUS

20:17 Wife as property.
21:4 Wife and children belong to master.
21:7-11 OK to sell daughters. Female slaves can be used for sex.
Polygamy permitted. Unwanted female slaves can be set "free" without payment of money.
22:18 Kill witches.


LEVITICUS

12:1 Childbirth a sin, Women unclean after childbirth.
15:19-32 Menstruating women are unclean.
20:10-16 Death penalty for homosexuality and various sexual transgressions.
21:7 Priests must not marry prostitutes or divorcees.
21:9 Burn daughters.
21:13-14 Priest must marry virgin, not "used" woman.


NUMBERS

1:2 Census lists only men - women do not count.
5:11-31 Fidelity test for women only.
30:1-16 Woman's vow invalid unless approved by her father or husband.
31:17-18 Kill all except virgins. Keep virgins for yourselves.
CH 12 Miriam punished for rebuking Moses.


DEUTERONOMY

20:14 Take women, livestock as plunder.
22:13-21 Stone non-virgin bride.
22:23-24 Stone rapist and rape victim.
22:28 Rape victim must marry rapist; rape victim's father compensated for depreciation of his property.
25:11-12 Cut woman's hand for touching foe's penis.
24:1-5 Man can "send" wife from HIS house. Man must not marry "used" woman.
28:18 The FRUIT of your womb will be cursed - eclectic "pro-life" verse!


JUDGES

5:30 Women are spoils of war.
14:20 Samson gives wife to another man.
16:1 Samson visits prostitute.
CH 19 Concubine pack-raped and butchered.
21:10-12 Slaughtered all inc. women and children. Saved virgins for wives.
21:21 Abducted girls for wives.


RUTH

Ruth shags Boaz.

1 SAMUEL

15:2-3 Attack Amalekites, kill men, women, children and livestock.
22:19 Kill all inc. infants and livestock.
21:4-5 Men avoid defilement with women.


2 SAMUEL

5:13 David took many wives and concubines.
CH 13 Ammon rapes his own sister.
16:21-22 Absalom sleeps with his father's concubines.
6:20-23 Mischal punished with bareness.


1 KINGS

11:3 Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines.


2 KINGS

9:30-37 Brutal murder of Jezebel.


2 CHRONICLES

15:13 Put to death unbelievers.
11:21 Hoards of wives and concubines.


ESTHER

CH 1-2 Queen Vashti dethroned for disobedience; setting "bad" example to all other women.


PSALMS

51:5 Sinful since conception.
127:3 Sons are heritage from god.
137:9 Seizes infants and dashes them against rocks.


PROVERBS

CH 5 Beware of wicked women!
CH 7 More of the above.
6:24 As above.
31:3 Do not waste strength on women.


ISAIAH

3:16-26 Lord punishes haughty women.
4:4 Filthy women.
13:16 Ravish wives, dash infants.
19:16 Will be like women! (insult to Egyptians)


EZEKIEL

9:6-7 Slaughter all including children.
CH 16 Prostitutes, stoning, promiscuity...
CH 23 Tale of two adulterous sisters - reads like the script of a pornographic film. I bet you weren't told this story at Sunday school!


HOSEA

13:16 Rip pregnant women, dash little ones. (Another "pro-life" verse!)


NAHUM

3:4... wanton lust of a harlot... prostitution... witchcraft.
3:5 I will lift your skirts over your face!
3:13... Your troops are all women. (insult to Nineveh)


MATTHEW

5:32Husband can divorce wife for adultery. Can wife divorce husband for the same?
CH 25 Sexist tale of ten virgins.


LUKE

2:22 Mary must be purified after birth of Jesus.
2:49 Jesus rebukes his mother.


I CORINTHIANS

11:2-10... Woman created for man.
14:34 Women must be silent in churches.


EPHESIANS

5:22-24 Wives must submit to husbands in everything.


COLOSSIANS

3:18 Wives submit to husbands.
3:22 Slaves must obey masters in everything.


I TIMOTHY

2:11-15 Woman must not have authority…she must be silent. Women can be saved with childbearing.
5:9-10 Widows should be faithful to husband and must wash saints' feet.


1 PETER

2:18 Slaves submit to masters, even masters who are harsh.
3:1 Wives submit.
3:5-6 Sarah calls husband master.


REVELATION

CH 17 Destroy great prostitute.
14:4...they did not DEFILE themselves with women but kept themselves pure.

reply

many of your 'gems' don't make sense... just to pick at a few...

eg. "Priest must marry virgin, not "used" woman." ...umm, yea so? Why should a priest be allowed to marry a non-virgin? It's not that absurd.

"Sinful since conception." ...yea... so... that's what baptism is for.. to clean adam and eve's sin.

"CH 17 Destroy great prostitute."... "4The woman was dressed in purple and scarlet, and was glittering with gold, precious stones and pearls. She held a golden cup in her hand, filled with abominable things and the filth of her adulteries. 5This title was written on her forehead: MYSTERY BABYLON THE GREAT THE MOTHER OF PROSTITUTES AND OF THE ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. 6I saw that the woman was drunk with the blood of the saints, the blood of those who bore testimony to Jesus."
And the problem with destroying this woman is...?

"14:4...they did not DEFILE themselves with women but kept themselves pure" it means they are virgins...ie. did not have sex with women and so are not defiled (def:'to make unclean or impure: as to corrupt the purity or perfection of').. so they are not totally pure cuz they arn't vigins... so what

"Sarah calls husband master." and then it says "7The same goes for you husbands: Be good husbands to your wives. Honor them, delight in them. As women they lack some of your advantages. But in the new life of God's grace, you're equals. Treat your wives, then, as equals so your prayers don't run aground."

Women were also the first to hear from an Angel that Christ has risen from the dead, and they knew even before His Apostles. Had it not been for women, we would not have Jesus and therefore would not have the privelage of having our sins cleaned and we would not have a chance of being saved (since there would be no Blood and Flesh of Jesus Christ for us to take as Holy Communion and Heaven would still be closed).

and your quotes to all the violence ... sure there's a lot of violence in the Old Testament. God knows what those people whom were ordered to be killed would have done in their lives and I'm not claiming to understand why God did this, but knowing what would happen if He let these people live (ie. they had no chance of getting back on the right track), why let them live and let them get worse? The babies too... it might seem awful to kill babies but what good would it be if God knew that they would grow up sinners with no chance of being saved? Which brings up another point that only after the New Testament are we given the chance to repent and save ourselves. Before that everyone-good or bad went to hades after they died and when Jesus died on the Cross He went and whoever repented, followed Him and went to Heaven -- for all we know all those babies and people who God ordered to die could be in heaven now.

reply

PS Hats off to PRISCILLAGRRR!! Most people probably needed that.
by the way, some of those women were just "bad"

###############################

From under the big green light

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Warren,
in the Old Testament, it talks about homosexuality yes. It talks of homosexual men trying to rape a man, but end up raping and killing a woman. That's pretty despicable isn't it? I'd say. In the Bible, it says that what the homosexuals are DOING is despicable, not the homosexuals. They are sinning the same way a man who rapes a woman or commits adultry sins. God says that it's terribly wrong.

But you obviously haven't read the entire Bible. If you had even touched the New Testament, there are many references to sexual immorality, but it shows how Jesus kept people from stoning and hating someone who committed those sins. It talks about compassion.

Just because it makes "references" to these sins, doesn't mean it isn't teaching morality. In fact, quite the opposite is true. How can it say they are wrong without mentioning them?

And you're right, those things would be disgusting to watch. And it's really a shame that humanity can sink to such levels that are below that of even animals. Warren, I challenge you to read more than a couple sentences of the Bible, and yes, try reading them IN CONTEXT, and I think you'll have a much better idea of what it's saying.

I'm just sorry that people like you are so incredibly close-minded. Or at least you come across that way. Maybe it's just a front for a bad experience with Christianity you had. If that's the case, I'm sorry it's made you harden your heart. But please, don't close up your mind.

reply

the bible is full of hate and intolerance, some of you *christians* should read the whole thing before saying that its full of morals.
Has anyone actually read the old testament? i dont see a bit of "good christian morals" in there.... it starts off saying that god created women to be men's helpers, and that our punishment for eating from the 'tree of knowledge' is to be surbervient to our husbands... and thats only the first book!
Being raised catholic, i was only taught the "nice" parts of the bible, but the truth is that it contains some horrily biggoted passages as well, and i wont believe in some book that says im inferior to men.

reply

Being subservient DOES NOT mean that you are inferior. God created man to be the leader of the household, and woman to follow his lead. Also, men are supposed respect us and cherish us. They also are supposed to let us help them lead.

If you read closely (and IN FULL CONTEXT of the passages) in the Old Testament, you will notice that even though God disciplines Israel, He also forgives them over and over and over. Even when they forsake God, He doesn't do the same. He only disciplines them because they need to know actions have concequences (like getting grounded for desobedience today). Beacause He loves them and doesn't want them to destroy their lives with even more sin that brought them into the state humankind was in. Very compassionate.

I wonder if you confuse tolerance with acceptance. Just because you have to tolerate someone doesn't mean that you should accept their sin as being okay. Tolerance is keeping your own beliefs and putting up with someone else's beliefs. It doesn't mean their way is right, you just respect their right to believe whatever the heck they want, regardless of where it gets them. Those people deserved punishment, and they got it. God is punishing them for their sin, not who they are.

reply

To priscillagrr:

I've read the whole Bible, cover to cover. Yes, there are many verses that seem sexist, but are you looking deep enough?

IF the entire Bible was filled with sexist junk, then why did Jesus talk to the Samaritan woman at the well? Why did he forgive the woman who commited adultery, and saved her from being stoned to death? Why would Rahab the harlot be mentioned in the Bible as part of Jesus' lineage?

Adam was not complete until God made Eve to be his perfect helper. He was alone in the world until she came along. That makes the first woman pretty darn important!

And is it so wrong to 'submit to your husband'? Realize that submitting to one's husband does NOT mean to let him trample you into the dust. He makes the decision, but we girls can influence him. It's not one or the other who leads the family; it's an equal yoke, with the husband making the final decision based on what both he and his wife think should be done.

Hope this makes sense...

There is one terrifying word in the world of nuclear physics: Oops.

reply

I would like to first say that I am a huge Veggietales fan. Truly, my entire family loves this incredible series (and now, film). The youngest person in my family is 18! The humor is for all ages, and as other posters said, the fact Veggietale has a higher message makes it better than all the children's programming that's available on tv today. (Don't even get me started on my anger at the dumbification of Sesame Street, a program I enjoyed as a child)
Regarding the accusations that the bible lessons at the end are unneeded, where do you live???? Clearly not on earth, or you would have seen what happens when the powers that be believe that you can take away God, religion, faith, prayer, bible reading, etc.and still continue to have a moral society. How about I take America, my home, for example. What is one of the biggest issues right now in this society? Failing Schools! The public school system has become a joke! More parents are pulling their children out than ever, and guess where they are sending them? Christian Schools, or Homeschool! Why??? Why do public schools fail, while the private ones (based on Christianity) succeed? Hmmm, I wonder, could it perhaps have something to do with taking the bible and prayer out of public schools? Using this example, I'm sure many would agree that taking God out of Veggietales is NOT going to improve it! Its the thing that makes these whimsical stories actually ring true to the veiwers.
I'd like to make a point. America has a very pluralistic mindset. A lot of people will tell you that its ok to believe anything. They'd tell you that everyone's right in their own way. But if you suggest for even one second that someone could be wrong, that say there was only one way to heaven, and that all other ways lead to hell, then those people will say that you're intolerant! And that they don't like intolerant people, they tolerate everyone, and why can't we be just like them??? But, hmmm, isn't it rather intolerant of them not to say that I'm right in my belief that there's only one way to heaven??? I'd say those people are rather hypocritical. It comes down to this, nothing is taboo in America, except the belief that pluralism is wrong. (oh, and don't worry, I don't hold grudges against anyone who bothers to label me. I take the badge 'intolerant' and wear it proudly)
The last thing I'd like to say is regarding the post that accuses God of hating women and putting them below men. Sigh, I don't even know where to begin. I am soooooooo sad that you have been so tainted against the bible as to really believe that. I don't see much of a point to responding to your points one by one, because, frankly, at this point its clear that your mind is made up. No evidence I give to the contrary will change your opinion. But, I do hope you read this, and I hope that you aren't as set in your beliefs as you seem. I am a young woman also, and I am proud that God made me a woman. The role that God designed for women is sooooooo important! In truth, God treasures women! The blessings bestowed upon women are unique and very different from those given to men, but that doesn't mean that God loves one gender better than another. Yes, there is the whole issue of the curse. (But then, that's the whole reason we are even talking about this. I mean, if Adam and Eve hadn't sinned in the garden, we'd still be there, and there'd have been no need for a saviour.) But men suffer from their part of the curse as well. Adam didn't try to stop Eve, he followed her in her sin. And yes, it was a sin, God told them not to eat of the tree. Disobedience is a sin. But God loves all whom He created, and He gave us a way out of our sin. He gave us our saviour, and he used a woman as His vessel to bring Him into the world. She wasn't perfect, and one of the things I don't like about the Catholic church is their glorification of a sinful woman. (There are passages in the Scriptures that condemn lifting up a 'queen of heaven') But God blessed her life, and he continues to bless the women of today. I hope this helps someone, if not you, to understand that God's love for women and men never fails, despite our shortcomings.

reply

[deleted]

Hey, Anne. I didn't know you came and posted on a VeggieTales board. Nice to see you again.

This is your life, are you who you want to be?
~Switchfoot

reply