MovieChat Forums > Kaena: La prophétie (2003) Discussion > It can't be expected to be USA standard ...

It can't be expected to be USA standard animation



Look, I don't understand why you guys that are critisizing this film can't lay off a bit. This is one of the first full CGI type films that France has produced by itself and lets face it, they don't have the high technology animation firms that the USA and Japan have. I thought that it was an original idea for a storyline and that there were definitely some memorable moments...ok so it was no Pixar movie, but considering that it was made by a French company it isn't too damn bad!!!
:)
XxX

reply

I disagree. Are you trying to say the French (as in- all of them at once collaboratively and left to "their" own devices) have a rudimentary eye for computer animation asthetics? I'm more inclined to think maybe the specific company that made the movie was a bit out of step, and this is not some sort of flagship example of french CG capabilities.


-as for the animation
The first thing I thought while watching the first 20 minutes of this movie was "this was made in 2003"? The animation is extremely dated. It reminded me of one of the movie intro scenes in StarCraft/Descent 3/any pre-1999 video game.
The movie wasn't unwatchable, but I would have enjoyed it more if it were cut into 30 minute segments, and played as a series of episodes (Saturday morning cartoons maybe?)

reply

The problem with the animation in this movie is that whoever was in charge thought that as long as everything had a high enough polygon count it would look amazing. The motion is what kills the animation, just like Shrek and Shrek 2 and any other Dreamworks release. When producers and directors focus in on the poly counts instead of the motion, bad things happen to my eyes!

reply

Let me agree and disagree at the same time with some points.
In my opinion the fact that this movie comes from France (and Canada actually) has indeed a lot to do with the reaction most of the american (and anglo-saxon in general -shall I add swedish to the list... seems so...you disappoint me guys-) audience has.
Other culture, other aesthetic taste, other other other. And let's face it, it is not lying than to say that some cultures think that their own standardized views are universal and the only good ones.
It is not what you expected... fine, that still does not remove its qualities, just open your eyes for a while and forget your -oh so- standardized cultural references, come on, give us a break!

For what is of the "stolen" story, as I have read in another post, that kind of arguments always makes me laugh. How many stories in this world are "stolen"?
" " simply because most of the time they are not even stolen, several people have more or less the same ideas at the same period, not new, has always happened.
I too wrote stories when I was a kid and found out the same ideas years after in "brand new" movies, shall I say those have been stolen to me? Would be far too easy. I still think that the culture of the "Intellectual Property" climbed a little too much in the head of some, at the point to make them forget some human truths : stories are never new, often based on legends and all our legends, from all cultures on this little blue planet, are the same if you take the time to analyse them and dig a little.
Funny enough, one shall say to Mr Tolkien -well at least to his ghost- that he pumped out his "Lord of the Rings" on all the european legends :P

reply

[deleted]