MovieChat Forums > Décalage horaire (2002) Discussion > Juliette is nicer with or without make-u...

Juliette is nicer with or without make-up???


Well, that make up was very nice, don't know why Reno didn'd like it. And you?

reply

I thought the make-up was horrible and she looked much better without it.

reply

I thought she looked better with it

reply

I don't see anyone can think that she looked better with the makeup, it was horrible makeup...really really overdone and tacky. Made her look like a hooker. She looks great without it!

I cut my finger, that's tragedy!
A man walks into an open sewer and dies, that's comedy!

reply

She is amazing without the makeup.

reply

Without make-up! However, I suspect the heavy make-up and unusual hair style was done to provide sufficient contrast for the scene where she comes out of the shower without make-up and with wet hair.....stunning! I've noticed how almost every director who works with Julliet Binoche can't resist doing long close up shots of her. I know I couldn't resist. She is so striking.



Writing about movies is like dancing about architecture

reply

Without make up - very stunning i agree

not big on romantic comedies but i did enjoy this movie

it was refreshingly different and it was not all based on sex which was different for a romance film

reply

"I've noticed how almost every director who works with Julliet Binoche can't resist doing long close up shots of her. I know I couldn't resist. She is so striking."

And a great actress too! I dropped into the middle of this film on TV and was wondering why I hadn't heard about this Victoria Abril movie before. So I think the make-up was a great idea, and served its purpose well. She was unrecognisable.


M
http://the-script.blogspot.com

reply

I just know your all going to jump on me for saying this, but here goes!

Its the movies dammit! Most every scene she is going to have make-up! Its the way she's made-up!

reply

Actually, that's not entirely true. In "Notting Hill" when Julia Roberts wakes up without make-up, she really doesn't have make-up on. She thought the director meant, "made-up, no make-up" and he said no, he meant, "clean face." So she washed it off and that's her without make-up, still beautiful. This has become acceptable in film and television, a tv example being Jennifer Garner in ALIAS, really with no make-up when she's in the tub. So it is very likely that the Juliette Binoche we see without make-up is for real.

reply

Just want to add one thing to this Board: yossarian100 is right. The contrast with and without make-up is intentional. In fact, it's a visual way to express two simple plot points. First (as the last of the Assyrians noted), Felix' sudden and unguarded interest in the stranger he'd wanted to query about why women leave men; and, at the end, to reflect Rose's evolving sense of her self. The scene in the hotel kitchen is pivotal. She says something like, "First time in my life no one knows where I am, I feel..." and Felix says, "Brand new..."

reply

Not only the makeup, but the hair was hideous. More contrast.

reply

without make up, she looks great... and it's true the hair was mega ugly

reply

I like her makeup in Acapulco- closer to not wearing any at all compared with the uber-makeup in the De Gaulle airport bathroom. She's a stunning woman in any case.

reply

Seriously, i think she is the most beautiful woman on the big screen ever... and i mean it, although she is not so young today...
I didn't watch the film but i saw the trailer and i was really surprised to see her like that, i say NO MAKE UP, she is beautiful without it.

reply

Rose's abusive boyfriend Sergio sarcastically calls her a "doll". The artificial makeup, in colors of blue and lavender, emphasises the masklike quality of her life. In movies the makeup, hair and costume help establish the character. I was surprised to see Juliette Binoche presented this way in a movie. It helped me to accept the type of woman she plays here, so different from "Chocolat" or "Damage" or "The English Patient".

reply

[deleted]

Nicer without the excessive makeup, but as my girlfriend noted when we watched this last night, after the initial shot without the makeup, pretty quickly afterwards when she's still sitting there in the bathrobe, it looks like rouge has appeared on her cheeks, her lips have some lipstick again and her hair's been done...

reply

[deleted]

Hell, she's nice either way. She's such a great actress and a very beautiful spirit.



I'm one of the chosen few, Who went ahead and fell for you.
I'm out of bold, I'm out of touch,I fell too fast, I feel too much.
I thought that you might have, some advise to give, on how to be, insensitive.

reply

I noticed the same thing. But what did change was the eye lines. In the "makeup-off" scenes, the thin but well defined lines of the eyebrows with the small dark eyes allow for her expressions to convey greater sincerity. Watch closely and you'll see that the real transformation of the character comes not from the lipstick or rouge, but when she reapplies the mascarra.

reply

Without! She has natural beauty which is hidden when she wears all that makeup.

reply

I agree with the original poster. I really appreciated the way she looked during the first half of the film. I like women being stylish and all made up, from head to foot.
I don't think there's such a thing as natural beauty. Everything is achieved by applying make-up, more or less. Sometimes those women who want to look "natural" use even more of it than those who look more "artificial".

reply

I think she looks much better without makeup

PinkSugar

reply

I liked her from the start, but when she got all that make-up off she was... stunning. Really.

reply