MovieChat Forums > Endgame (2003) Discussion > What an awful movie.

What an awful movie.


This movie was perfectly terrible. The plot, the writing, most of the acting. Cutting a half hour would have helped greatly.

The only redeeming factor was Daniel Newman, who manages to be handsome, cute, and beautiful all at the same time. Plus he has a gorgeous body. He was the best actor as well.

I was even more disappointed when I found out that the shower scene in the version I saw had the full frontal (and rear!) nudity edited out.

Current photos of him at about age 30 show that he has aged rather well. He is a bit less cute and beautiful now but a good deal more handsome.

Bottom line, if he hadn't been in it, I wouldn't have been able to watch the whole thing.

I was very surprised to find out it was not made for television, especially since the version I saw was NOT wide screen.

reply

I've just seen it, I wouldn't call it awful. Seen much worse, I'd say just above average. Quite a brave film at times.

reply