I disagree strongly...
Roth beat both his previous victims to death, remember??? (Not that I've done it) but probably one of the hardest things to do is strangle or beat someone to death, both physically and mentally. To quote my UK friends, "He had the minerals."
The reason Roth didn't shoot him is two-fold.
1st, (the easiest) Young had the opportunity to fire back. Roth killed Byrne cause he treated him like a loser and bad person. Roth probably got that vibe from the 1st "young detective" he murdered in the past, since he felt he was passed over. Young submitted. Young didn't disrespect Roth or make him out to be a loser, even in what could've been Young's last moments; All that after both men knew Young DID have the rest of his life to live. Watch it again, Young has the gun and could raise it to fight, but instead accepts his fate. Roth respects that.
2nd, (the best) Roth saw himself and his past in Young. (Remember when Roth's looking at all Young's pictures on the wall, he literally SAW himself in Young...) Roth killed the previous "young detective" because he felt that guy wasn't better than him and not worthy of the promotion. With Young, Roth's been following him, so he knows, as far as the case goes, that Young was a good detective and doing things (at worst) correctly and (at best) better than he would've. That's why he gives Young Alison Moore's message about Vics... The only evidence with-held from Young. Remember, Roth investigated Vics and really couldn't get far... him giving that to Young and holding his hand was Roth seeing Young as a man who DESERVED everything he accomplished, DESERVED a chance to solve the case, and DESERVED to live.
Experience, though quite valuable, is something you only get just after you really need it.
reply
share