MovieChat Forums > The O'Reilly Factor (1996) Discussion > What kind of FOOL would buy his books!

What kind of FOOL would buy his books!


I hate how arrogant he is over his stupid dumbass books!

reply

They're good books. Read em sometime. You'll see. Killing Lincoln was one of the most interesting non-fictions I've ever read. The first part which provides basically a running narrative of Lee's flight from Petersburg was superbly written. Couldn't put it down.

I hate how arrogant he is over his stupid dumbass books!


If you wrote books you'd do your best to sell them too. But you don't. Stop being so jealous.

reply

[deleted]

O'Reilly is a LIAR and a NUTCASE! Jesus was NOT a historical character! There are no contemporary accounts or eyewitness accounts that he ever existed!

No one has the slightest physical evidence to support a historical Jesus; no artifacts, dwelling,works of carpentry,or self-written manuscripts. All claims about Jesus derive from writings of other people. There occurs no contemporary Roman record that shows Pontius Pilate executing a man named Jesus. Devastating to historians,there occurs not a single contemporary writing that mentions Jesus. All documents about Jesus came well after the life of the alleged Jesus from either: unknown authors, people who had never met an earthly Jesus,or from fraudulent,mythical or allegorical writings.

http://www.nobeliefs.com/exist.htm

reply

No one has the slightest physical evidence to support a historical Jesus


You know I'm not a Christian, kid, but I'm going to give you some homework anyway. Show me one other Judean carpenter from that period for whom there IS physical evidence to support their existence. For that matter, find me some physical evidence of ANY carpenter from ANY Roman province for whom there IS physical evidence. As I recall I've asked you this before, and never got a response. Frankly, that does not surprise me.

reply

Herb you dumb redneck there is no OBJECTIVE evidence of Jesus AT ALL. The 2 that Christnuts claim are Josephus and Tacitus but they NEVER saw an earthly Jesus. Neither did gospel writers! No objective historical character ever mentions a Jesus existed.

Josephus and Tacitus also thought Hercules was real and Tacitus actually mentions Hercules more than Jesus! All that ChristNUTS can do is say "the bible says so" which is garbage since the bible believed in talking snakes and unicorns!

The bible has long been debunked as Judeo Christian MYTH and no credible scientist believes it is real!

reply

You know I'm not a Christian, kid, but I'm going to give you some homework anyway. Show me one other Judean carpenter from that period for whom there IS OBJECTIVE evidence to support their existence. For that matter, find me some physical evidence of ANY carpenter from ANY Roman province for whom there IS physical evidence. As I recall I've asked you this before, and never got a response. Frankly, that does not surprise me.

See Nick. I ask this guy questions like this over and over and over and he NEVER comes at me with any kind of reasonable answer, because he is stupid and he can't. Not being a devout Christian I honestly don't care much about the debate fauny keeps trying to drag me into. I've kicked his childish *** on so many other things that he's retreated to debating the reality of religion because he knows it is a game you cannot win or lose. If you have a ridiculous amount of free time on your hands, and want to have a little fun, go read some of the 'discussions' me and fauny have had on the issue of 'gun control'. He's so completely clueless on that issue but tries to carry himself as some crusader for public safety. He's more or less given up on that now because I challenge his crap and he can't win. He's a complete tool for the DNC and he knows it. Libtard through and through. I know he's not going to change, but it's still fun to watch him twist, and try to defend himself for the ridiculous crap he says.

Pretty much every post he sends my way these days has one of the following phrases in the first line:

1. Dumb Redneck
2. Klansman
3. Gun Masturbator

Don't know why I feel the need to trash an angry little 12-year old prick, but oh well.

reply

Herb, my name isn't Nick you MORON and I have totally OWNED you on every topic. You are just too foolish and naive to realize it!

You obviously don't know how BURDEN OF PROOF works. The burden of proof is on the BELIEVER to show a certain process or thing exists. You realize there are stories of HUNDREDS of gods so should we just believe them because a story exists you braindead redneck? A story of a god is NOT evidence of a god!

OWNED YET AGAIN!

reply

Once again, I've gone a bit too fast for fauny's brain. I'll have to slow it down yet again.

You said, in bold face I might add, the following:

No one has the slightest physical evidence to support a historical Jesus

I've seen you make this point multiple times, on multiple boards. Obviously you believe it has merit.

In response I asked you, I believe three times now, to do the following:

Show me one other Judean carpenter from that period for whom there IS physical evidence to support their existence. For that matter, find me some physical evidence of ANY carpenter from ANY Roman province for whom there IS physical evidence

In every instance, you have not responded. You simply divert, deflect, or insult because that's all your childish mind is capable of. Either finally do as I requested, multiple times, or I want you to admit, as you should, that your argument is what it is. 100% bull****. Do that, and we can move on to something else. If you don't, you are only providing another in a heap of evidence that points to the fact that you are a dishonest, brainwashed, 100% liberal piece of human garbage. I already know this to be true, so prove me wrong.

I'm not going to debate the existence of Jesus Christ because it is 100% impossible to prove or disprove at this point in time. Religion is a matter of faith. A faith that I do not practice, so it is not my place. I'm simply arguing with you about you. And you have consistently shown yourself to be a useless lump of ****. That's what I find entertaining about you.

I have totally OWNED you on every topic


You've left many an open debate on gun control, because you don't have a leg to stand on. Get back to that please. It's hilarious to watch you twist and try to defend your ridiculous crap. Criticizing religion is the refuge of the liberal who can't win at anything else. That's you dumb***. Realize that yet?


reply

LOL..you admit defeat on Jesus by saying you won't debate his existence because you have NO argument! You can't be so stupid as to not see the total logical fallacy of using the bible to prove the bible is real! Using that logic EVERY religious book is real if you simply use that book as proof! OBJECTIVE sources don't exist on Jesus because he is Judeo Christian MYTH!

On gun control you have been destroyed over and over! More guns=More gun deaths=More gun carnage

Where there are more guns there is more homicide

(literature review).

Our review of the academic literature found that a broad array

of evidence indicates that gun availability is a risk factor for

homicide,both in the United States and across high-income

countries. Case-control studies,ecological time-series and

cross-sectional studies indicate that in homes,cities,states and

regions in the US,where there are more guns,both men and women are at

higher risk for homicide,particularly firearm homicide.

Hepburn, Lisa; Hemenway, David. Firearm availability and homicide: A

review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior: A Review Journal.

2004;9:417-40.

2. Across high-income nations, more guns = more homicide.

We analyzed the relationship between homicide and gun availability using data

from 26 developed countries from the early 1990s. We found that across

developed countries,where guns are more available,there are more homicides.

These results often hold even when the United States is excluded.

Hemenway, David; Miller, Matthew. Firearm availability and homicide rates

across 26 high income countries. Journal of Trauma. 2000;49:985-88.

3. Across states, more guns = more homicide

Using a validated proxy for firearm ownership,we analyzed the relationship

between firearm availability and homicide across 50 states over a ten year

period (1988-1997).

After controlling for poverty and urbanization,for every age group,people in

states with many guns have elevated rates of homicide,particularly firearm

homicide.


http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/hicrc/firearms-research/guns-and-death/

OWNED yet again Herb! Go crawl back into your white trash redneck bunker!

reply

LOL..you admit defeat on Jesus


Never engaged in that debate. You know that. I challenged your simple mind, and you still have not responded to my inquiry to any level of satisfaction. Try again **** for brains.

I see you are letting others fight your battles for you because they spin the way you want them to spin. What a sheep. Post that crap on a thread it belongs in and I'll slap it back at you there.

reply

Never engaged in that debate because you would LOSE just like how you lose every other debate you inbred redneck! "The bible says so" is not evidence of the existence of Jesus!

reply

That's deflection faun. You are trying to change the subject because you've been exposed as an idiot and don't like it. Be a man, and back up your crap.

Just one name, ONE SINGLE NAME of a Carpenter from antiquity, from anywhere, for whom there is physical or objective EVIDENCE of their existence. I'm still waiting, and probably will be waiting for a very long time. Ready to admit that statement is bull**** yet? Despite what you may think, I'll think more of you if you do that, not less. Because it is the honest thing to do.

reply

Herb, you are such a backwards ignorant redneck that you don't even know the difference between theology and history or what BURDEN of PROOF means! There are HUNDREDS of stories of gods so you believe them all just because a story exists?? A story of a god is NOT evidence of a god!

Here is a summary of how Jesus is simply Judeo Christian MYTH!

1. Fraudulent family history going back thousands of years. Two of them in fact, that differ in more than 30 ways.
2. Phony census story and contrived birth to fit some "Old Testament prophecy"
3. One story when he is about 12. Apart from that, his entire childhood and adolescence is missing.
4. A ministry in his "30s" that talks about him doing miracles for more than thousand people that no historical character ever documented.
5. He never writes or creates anything nor dictates writing to anybody. There is no Biography of Christ or Gospel of Christ.
6. Every piece of scripture is an anonymous, non-eyewitness account written DECADES after he's allegedly dead and gone.
7. The church's foremost apostle, Paul, is SHOCKINGLY SILENT about nearly every single physical aspect of Jesus Christ
8. Nobody ever physically saw him or described his appearance.
9. His empty tomb isn't venerated for centuries.

reply

Not our debate faun. Never has been. You know that. You are simply trying to make it that way because it is so easy for you to declare victory. I'm simply trying to make you a bit more honest. Believe it or not, I want to help you.

I want you to admit that your repeated point about there being no physical evidence of Jesus of Nazareth's existence was bull****. If you do not, than do as I have repeatedly asked, and provide me one carpenter from anywhere in the Roman Empire of that time for whom there IS physical evidence that they existed. Do one of those two, and you will be a bit more honest.

Apart from that, his entire childhood and adolescence is missing.


Give me the story of one other carpenter from that period whose childhood is well documented and corroborated by multiple, reliable, and independent sources. I'll bet you can't.

Nobody ever physically saw him or described his appearance.


How can your simple ignorant *** possibly know that. I've done tons of **** in my life that nobody will have proof of 2000 years from now, and I live in a time of meticulous documentation of damn near everything. How can you believe that crap statement with ANY degree of certainty. Just because nobody wrote it down, and preserved it for 2000 years, does not mean it never happened. It does not mean it did, but it cannot be used to evidence the idea that it never happened. You are an idiot and a sheep as usual.

By the way, I'll notice I've never seen you question Muslims about the divinity of Mohammed. Nor have I seen you question Buddhists about the divinity of Buddha. I want you to admit that you simply hate Christians. I'd also like to know who it was that told you you should hate Christians, because they've done you a horrible disservice. I've known many devout Christians who were the kindest, most honorable, most generous and most intelligent people I've ever known. You are an atheist (as am I) and one of the most vile, dishonest, mean-spirited pieces of human filth I've ever come across.

Christian faith may be based on myth, I can't say, it's not my place. But you know what, they are FAR better people than you, and they believe in it.



reply

Herb, you only show what an uneducated inbred redneck you are! You have no concept of history or how it works! The Christians are the ones who make the CLAIM so the burden of PROOF is on them not me!

To help your puny brain understand do you know the difference between a mythical carpenter and a historical carpenter? EVERYTHING about Jesus is myth! No eyewitness accounts, no contemporary accounts, he never wrote a single WORD, and no historical character even mentioned he lived when the bible claims he did!

reply

No eyewitness accounts


Present some eyewitness accounts of another 1'st century carpenter.

no contemporary accounts


Present some contemporary accounts of another 1'st century carpenter.

he never wrote a single WORD


Show me some writings by another 1'st century carpenter that persist to the present day.

Ready to admit that argument is bull**** yet. If not, then do these things, and back up your crap with something concrete that supports it.

reply

Herb, you are an uneducated dumbass redneck who doesn't understand how BURDEN OF PROOF works! There are stories of gods all over the world and according to your logic all those gods are real simply because a story exists!

EXPLAIN the scholarly quotes on Jesus below:

The world has been for a long time engaged in writing lives of Jesus... The library of such books has grown since then. But when we come to examine them,one startling fact confronts us: all of these books relate to a personage concerning whom there does not exist a single scrap of contemporary information -- not one! By accepted tradition he was born in the reign of Augustus,the great literary age of the nation of which he was a subject. In the Augustan age historians flourished; poets,orators,critics and travelers abounded. Yet not one mentions the name of Jesus Christ, much less any incident in his life.

-Moncure D. Conway [1832 - 1907] (Modern Thought)

It is only in comparatively modern times that the possibility was considered that Jesus does not belong to history at all.

-J.M. Robertson (Pagan Christs)

All four gospels are anonymous texts. The familiar attributions of the Gospels to Matthew,Mark,Luke and John come from the mid-second century and later and we have no good historical reason to accept these attributions.

-Steve Mason,professor of classics,history and religious studies at York University in Toronto (Bible Review,Feb. 2000,p. 36)

The question must also be raised as to whether we have the actual words of Jesus in any Gospel.

-Bishop John Shelby Spong

But even if it could be proved that John's Gospel had been the first of the four to be written down,there would still be considerable confusion as to who "John" was. For the various styles of the New Testament texts ascribed to John- The Gospel,the letters,and the Book of Revelations--are each so different in their style that it is extremely unlikely that they had been written by one person.

-John Romer,archeologist & Bible scholar (Testament)

It was not until the third century that Jesus' cross of execution became a common symbol of the Christian faith.

-John Romer,archeologist & Bible scholar (Testament)

What one believes and what one can demonstrate historically are usually two different things.

-Robert J. Miller,Bible scholar,(Bible Review,December 1993,Vol. IX,Number 6,p. 9)

When it comes to the historical question about the Gospels,I adopt a mediating position-- that is,these are religious records,close to the sources,but they are not in accordance with modern historiographic requirements or professional standards.

-David Noel Freedman,Bible scholar and general editor of the Anchor Bible series (Bible Review,December 1993,Vol. IX,Number 6,p.34)

Paul did not write the letters to Timothy to Titus or several others published under his name; and it is unlikely that the apostles Matthew, James,Jude,Peter and John had anything to do with the canonical books ascribed to them.

-Michael D. Coogan,Professor of religious studies at Stonehill College (Bible Review,June 1994)


Completely OWNED as always!

reply

Herb, I see you are left speechless with no response! As usual you are COMPLETELY owned!

reply

Nope. Just don't care much about religious debate. I've told you that. Do I point it out when you don't respond to my posts? No, because it is childish and stupid. That's your way, not mine. Like a typical ***hole you are jumping to conclusions you know nothing about to satisfy your miniscule standards for 'victory'. The liberal way.

I am a bit perplexed though. Usually any responses to my posts show up in my inbox. I got no such notice for either of your past two responses on this thread. Just sort of stumbled back on it. You sure you replied to mine?

reply

By the by. It appears you pulled all that crap off of http://www.nobeliefs.com/exist.htm

When will you stop running to obviously biased sources to back up your crap. I have no faith in God. Nor do I have faith that www.nobeliefs.com has anything useful to say about God. They are as biased on the topic as you are.

Do your own ****ing work next time.

reply

By the by. You've still not answered. Please do.

You said, in bold face I might add, the following:

No one has the slightest physical evidence to support a historical Jesus

I've seen you make this point multiple times, on multiple boards. Obviously you believe it has merit.

In response I asked you, I believe four times now, to do the following:

Show me one other Judean carpenter from that period for whom there IS physical evidence to support their existence. For that matter, find me some physical evidence of ANY carpenter from ANY Roman province for whom there IS physical evidence

In every instance, you have not responded. You simply divert, deflect, or insult because that's all your childish mind is capable of. Either finally do as I requested, multiple times, or I want you to admit, as you should, that your argument is what it is. 100% bull****. Do that, and we can move on to something else. If you don't, you are only providing another in a heap of evidence that points to the fact that you are a dishonest, brainwashed, 100% liberal piece of human garbage. I already know this to be true, so prove me wrong.

I know this is hard for you to understand, so I'll help you a little bit. All you need to say is 'well, I guess you're right herb. Just because there is no physical evidence that has survived to this day of a 2000 years dead carpenter from a backwater Roman province, doesn't mean he didn't exist. I guess that is true, and I was wrong to make that statement. Heck, there are thousands of people who have died in the past 10 years for whom there is no surviving physical evidence of their existence. I know my logic is flawed, and I'll try harder in the future'

Say that, and I'll have a bit of respect for you on the basis of honesty.

reply

Herb, you are OWNED and DESTROYED!

You don't understand how burden of proof works. The burden of proof is on the BELIEVER to show a certain process or thing exists! It is NOT on me! You believe stories of hundreds of gods all over the world just because a story was written? LMAO!

Look at this video by your cousin, a true redneck who assumed Jesus was real but when he looked at the EVIDENCE he realized Jesus is CLEARLY a myth! Not even the Pope can refute this! It's AWESOME and only a few minutes long:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTqyocFOMXE

reply

Herb, you are OWNED and DESTROYED!


Long as you speak like you have the mind of nine year old, nobody will take you seriously, nor should they. I mean, you DO have the mind of a nine-year old, but that being the case, you really shouldn't try to argue with grown ups. Only a complete child routinely tries to claim a victory they've not earned. You do that with EVERY post. It's ****ing pathetic. As are you. I know you have nothing to be proud of, but have you no pride at all? Earn your victory first, then celebrate it. Granted, you can't win this argument, so you'll never have a legitimate reason to claim a victory. So I guess I understand why you need to fudge a little. It's a kid thing.

The burden of proof is on the BELIEVER to show a certain process or thing exists! It is NOT on me!


100% irrelevant in our current argument. In any case I know it better than you do.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_burden_of_proof

When the assertion to prove is a negative claim, the burden takes the form of a negative proof, proof of impossibility, or mere evidence of absence. If this negative assertion (that's you fauny) is in response to a claim made by another party in a debate (your Christian friends), asserting the falsehood of the positive claim (you again) shifts the burden of proof from the party making the first claim (Christians again) to the ONE ASSERTING THE FALSEHOOD (THAT'S ****ING YOU DIP****!!!!), as the agnostic position that "I don't believe that X is true" (That's fine, and that's what I do) is different to the explicit denial "I believe that X is false" (that's you, and other Atheist *****es, it's NOT fine, and you CAN'T ****ING PROVE IT!).

So shut the **** up about burden of proof. You are a ridiculous and silly little child, you don't know what it means, you don't know **** about anything you ***** about, and it just KILLS YOU that you CAN'T disprove the existence of a deity. You may WISH the burden of proof was not on you, but it just isn't so in matters of the metaphysical. It would make your crusade a whole lot easier, which is why you spout all this burden of proof bull**** even though you have no idea what it really means. As it stands, you can't win, and never will. Accept it kid. I'm not a person of faith, but I've no right (nor do you) to demand that somebody of faith dismiss that faith, just because they cannot prove it. Because you cannot disprove it, and therefore cannot judge anybody. I can judge YOU though, for being a complete ****ing ***hole, all day, every day, for the whole of your malignant existence.

You believe stories of hundreds of gods all over the world just because a story was written? LMAO!


No I don't. Why do you say I do? ****ing liar! I want an answer to that one by the way. So answer it you malignant little ****.

Not even the Pope can refute this!


Heh. Just like you can't refute the existence of a God . How about you go show that to the Pope and see what he says.

You dodge and deflect again. You can't do as I've repeatedly asked, and won't admit that you can't. That makes you a dishonest ***hole, which we all know perfectly well by now. This whole thread I've been contesting one completely fallacious argument that you've repeatedly made with great vigor. You refuse to admit that it is bull****, as I knew you would.

Once again, I don't give a **** about the reality of God or the truth of Jesus. You know that, because I've told you MANY times. This is about YOU, and YOU have shown yourself to be exactly what we all know you to be. 100% trash. Not worth talking to, or listening to. There is absolutely no honesty in you. You are a rancid little Pug that has absolutely no cause to be the ****stain you are. You have absolutely no shame.

I entered this 'argument' to expose you as a dishonest, unrepentant, unyielding, angry little ****head, with absolutely NO honesty in your argumentative process. That goal has been achieved more times than I'd hoped for. An unqualified success. Nobody believes anything you have to say, which is as it should be. Your atheist chums should be ashamed of you, because you are making them look REALLY bad! . I'm an agnostic, and my guys are doing just fine. Atheists are the lowest of the low. It's disgusting really. Why you've chosen to lump yourself in with such fascists I'll never understand.

Because I enjoy watching you dodge and be an idiot, we'll try again. Because you are a boy of very little brain, I'll slow it down so you can understand it. As before, if you find yourself failing to understand, go get your parents to help you.

#1 You say: Jesus wasn't real because there is no physical evidence to support his existence.

#2 I say: The guy supposedly lived 2,000 years ago, was a carpenter of no real status or position in his own time, who lived in a backwater Roman province in a time when record keeping was far removed from what it is today. Unless you can show 'physical evidence' of ONE SINGLE OTHER CARPENTER FROM THOSE DAYS, then that argument is completely empty and should no longer be used.

#3 So I want you to do this: Provide such physical evidence, or admit that that argument has absolutely no merit.

One or the other. If you do it you will have a shred of honesty to build future arguments on (if only a shred). That's how arguments work. Credibility. You have none, and you know that. Start building some, and you might get somewhere in these little 'quests' of yours.

It's AWESOME and only a few minutes long:


I don't give a **** how long or short it is. The past dozen or so internet things you've posted, I've read, or watched. You know how many of them advanced your argument in an honest way? Zero. By that record, this one is just as useless. So you know what. I'm not going to watch it. Based on past experience, it's bull****.

Get back to a real debate for a while. One that actually means something. Your last attempt was epically flaccid. I had a good chuckle.

Oh. By the way, you never answered my other question either (of course). Why is it that you hate Christians so much, and derive so much weird pleasure over trying to make them feel bad about their faith? What was it?

To you readers out there, I foresee a complete dodge in the near future. Fauny is a proven coward who can't argue the right way and win. He'll either:

1. Completely dodge (absolutely no honest and direct response to any of my questions or comments)
2. Move to childish insults (his norm)
3. Completely change the subject (he does this a lot too)
4. Focus all of his attention on the fact that I didn't watch his stupid youtube video.

#4 is really the only opening I gave him that he could in any way exploit to support his 'argument'. He's a complete louse, so he'll probably take it. But I don't really give a ****. I'm not watching any more of his obviously biased internet crap. It's all the same. All from wretchedly biased sources, and by people just as ignorant and fascist as he is. He thinks just because somebody went to Harvard they are above reproach. It's pathetic.

Just watch. I bet he'll post some link he googled up from some atheist website run by fascist idiots that are only slightly less ignorant than him, and then call me a redneck. . I know I've laughed a lot in this rather lengthy post. But it's just so damn funny.

EDIT 12/17/2013: Ha. Guess I forgot about #5. Be a complete puss and not respond at all. What a ****ing coward. After being such a little ***** about this whole thing for so long, and spewing hate all over the place with absolutely no provocation, you do in fact owe everybody an explanation, and an apology. So face up to it you ****ing coward.

I simply cannot abide those types. When you are beaten, you admit it. When you are wrong, you apologize. That is the way of decent people. This chump has absolutely no honesty in him at all. Where the **** does this useless and hateful human garbage come from?

To my Christian friends out there. Have a very Merry Christmas!

To the decent Atheists out there (and there are many, in spite of the ones like fauny that make them look REALLY awful), have a wonderful day!



reply

Fauny Boy, I see you are left speechless with no response! As usual you are COMPLETELY owned! . I love throwing your own crap back in your face.

When you are done crying like a little ***** get back on here and defend your bull**** some more. I miss that. With all your nonsense ranting about burden of proof, you should be able to come up with something to make me laugh.

reply

"Neither did gospel writers!"

Three Gospel writers knew him. Matthew, Mark & John. If you're gonna allow hate to compel you don't allow lies to enter in.

reply

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/45841

What we have here is failure to communicate!

reply

Is he a 'real' bigot or is that just a worked that's bandied about that means 'somebody you don't agree with'--IE: the new definition of 'fascist'; Is it like Don Imus's "nappy haired hoes' comment?

And what lies did he tell?

And are they REAL factual errors or are they on the order of 'the nation reviews Gunter Lewy's book' & raises a stink about how he doesn't 'reverently' refer to the VC/NVA as the 'national liberation front'? IE: Is a a real SERIOUS error or a matter of semantics?

reply

[deleted]

I am still lacking in facts as to whether or not to agree with ya.

reply

[deleted]

So then 75% out of wedlock births is NOT a bad thing???

Secondly: I don't know jack 'bout the guy, I don't watch him but I remember his ass on some sort of 'current events' show...

reply

[deleted]

Oh yeah, why ask for them facts thingies...just trust your word. Listen Chump: I don't badmouth Olbie, Maddow or Schultz on MSNBC because I don't watch them...I can't comment what I don't know about. You tell me all sorts of crap about B.O'R., but you don't tell me anything you've seen or heard him say...why should I trust you? I noticed on another blog a lurk at the O'Reilly did some sort of 'retraction' for something he said RE: the MLK 50 anniversary march, but I have no idea what it was...

reply

[deleted]

I find it terribly offensive when some narrow-minded twit like him tries to besmirch an entire race by saying "it's the breakdown of the family, with a lack of a fathers that is to blame for Black delinquencey


Is this not true? Do you have proof?

reply

[deleted]

I never miss the a-hole! I've actually taped it to make sure I hear every stupid word out of his bigoted mouth!


Then you are stupid, and hateful, and obviously biased. Nothing you say can be trusted. **** off. Everything you say, I am going to believe the opposite.

reply

He says it everyday! You obviously don't watch, so why are you questioning this?


I didn't question whether or not he said it dumb****. I know he says it. I questioned you as to whether you thought that statement was true? I think it is. A lot of people think it is. Doesn't make them racist. You obviously don't care about truth, and simply want to slander those who disagree with you. Hateful piece of rat filth.

reply

[deleted]

Incoherent eh? Y'suffer from reading disability it seems; so then:
Listen up dipstick: I asked ya a question but instead of giving me an answer you give me 'tude & bluster...you're a waste of my time with Lucy Pinder--so toodles.

reply

You're just one of 2 or 3 numbnuts who are trying to attack Bill! You're wasting your time!

Answer the man's question, or leave. If you have no stomach for honest debate, then why do you feel the need to start trouble. ***hole.

reply

[deleted]

Intelligent conversation is obviously not meant to be A-hole!


Don't try to come off like that's what you want. It's not. You know that. You're nothing but a hateful little brat. So bug off.

Bite me


Real mature kid.

reply

Well now, Herb...this thread wound up going nowhere, didn't it. Total oxygen wastage from the opposition.

reply

Heh. Do they ever? Still, best not to let their bull**** go unchallenged. It's fun to watch these types twist while trying to defend the indefensible crap they spew.

reply

Yeah...but sometimes I just find it too boring to try to deal with them. I pop 'em on 'ignore' & drive on.

reply

[deleted]

Yeah? Well tell me what I'm 'wrong about' then. And don't you think a 50-75 % out of wedlock birthrate is a BAD thing?

PS: Ya made a funny, "Billy Idol"...LOL!

reply

[deleted]

ooooo...are we puttin' words in me mouth, now, laddie? I said I don't comment on Olbie cuz I don't watch him (you sayin' I do watch him?) I said what does B O'R lie & about & you tell me I'm 'wrong'; the only other question I asked (Is a 50-75% out of wedlock birthrate good or bad?) has a 'yes' or 'no' answer.

PS: Please be clear in your responses; I don't want to be distracted from my Lucy Pinder Fansite.

reply

[deleted]

I'm a Democrat, but I'm not afraid to admit that his "Killing Kennedy" is very well written.

reply

publish or perish as they say...


🎄Season's Greetings!🎄

reply