What kind of FOOL would buy his books!
I hate how arrogant he is over his stupid dumbass books!
shareI hate how arrogant he is over his stupid dumbass books!
shareThey're good books. Read em sometime. You'll see. Killing Lincoln was one of the most interesting non-fictions I've ever read. The first part which provides basically a running narrative of Lee's flight from Petersburg was superbly written. Couldn't put it down.
I hate how arrogant he is over his stupid dumbass books!
[deleted]
O'Reilly is a LIAR and a NUTCASE! Jesus was NOT a historical character! There are no contemporary accounts or eyewitness accounts that he ever existed!
No one has the slightest physical evidence to support a historical Jesus; no artifacts, dwelling,works of carpentry,or self-written manuscripts. All claims about Jesus derive from writings of other people. There occurs no contemporary Roman record that shows Pontius Pilate executing a man named Jesus. Devastating to historians,there occurs not a single contemporary writing that mentions Jesus. All documents about Jesus came well after the life of the alleged Jesus from either: unknown authors, people who had never met an earthly Jesus,or from fraudulent,mythical or allegorical writings.
http://www.nobeliefs.com/exist.htm
No one has the slightest physical evidence to support a historical Jesus
Herb you dumb redneck there is no OBJECTIVE evidence of Jesus AT ALL. The 2 that Christnuts claim are Josephus and Tacitus but they NEVER saw an earthly Jesus. Neither did gospel writers! No objective historical character ever mentions a Jesus existed.
Josephus and Tacitus also thought Hercules was real and Tacitus actually mentions Hercules more than Jesus! All that ChristNUTS can do is say "the bible says so" which is garbage since the bible believed in talking snakes and unicorns!
The bible has long been debunked as Judeo Christian MYTH and no credible scientist believes it is real!
You know I'm not a Christian, kid, but I'm going to give you some homework anyway. Show me one other Judean carpenter from that period for whom there IS OBJECTIVE evidence to support their existence. For that matter, find me some physical evidence of ANY carpenter from ANY Roman province for whom there IS physical evidence. As I recall I've asked you this before, and never got a response. Frankly, that does not surprise me.
See Nick. I ask this guy questions like this over and over and over and he NEVER comes at me with any kind of reasonable answer, because he is stupid and he can't. Not being a devout Christian I honestly don't care much about the debate fauny keeps trying to drag me into. I've kicked his childish *** on so many other things that he's retreated to debating the reality of religion because he knows it is a game you cannot win or lose. If you have a ridiculous amount of free time on your hands, and want to have a little fun, go read some of the 'discussions' me and fauny have had on the issue of 'gun control'. He's so completely clueless on that issue but tries to carry himself as some crusader for public safety. He's more or less given up on that now because I challenge his crap and he can't win. He's a complete tool for the DNC and he knows it. Libtard through and through. I know he's not going to change, but it's still fun to watch him twist, and try to defend himself for the ridiculous crap he says.
Pretty much every post he sends my way these days has one of the following phrases in the first line:
1. Dumb Redneck
2. Klansman
3. Gun Masturbator
Don't know why I feel the need to trash an angry little 12-year old prick, but oh well.
Herb, my name isn't Nick you MORON and I have totally OWNED you on every topic. You are just too foolish and naive to realize it!
You obviously don't know how BURDEN OF PROOF works. The burden of proof is on the BELIEVER to show a certain process or thing exists. You realize there are stories of HUNDREDS of gods so should we just believe them because a story exists you braindead redneck? A story of a god is NOT evidence of a god!
OWNED YET AGAIN!
Once again, I've gone a bit too fast for fauny's brain. I'll have to slow it down yet again.
You said, in bold face I might add, the following:
No one has the slightest physical evidence to support a historical Jesus
I've seen you make this point multiple times, on multiple boards. Obviously you believe it has merit.
In response I asked you, I believe three times now, to do the following:
Show me one other Judean carpenter from that period for whom there IS physical evidence to support their existence. For that matter, find me some physical evidence of ANY carpenter from ANY Roman province for whom there IS physical evidence
In every instance, you have not responded. You simply divert, deflect, or insult because that's all your childish mind is capable of. Either finally do as I requested, multiple times, or I want you to admit, as you should, that your argument is what it is. 100% bull****. Do that, and we can move on to something else. If you don't, you are only providing another in a heap of evidence that points to the fact that you are a dishonest, brainwashed, 100% liberal piece of human garbage. I already know this to be true, so prove me wrong.
I'm not going to debate the existence of Jesus Christ because it is 100% impossible to prove or disprove at this point in time. Religion is a matter of faith. A faith that I do not practice, so it is not my place. I'm simply arguing with you about you. And you have consistently shown yourself to be a useless lump of ****. That's what I find entertaining about you.
I have totally OWNED you on every topic
LOL..you admit defeat on Jesus by saying you won't debate his existence because you have NO argument! You can't be so stupid as to not see the total logical fallacy of using the bible to prove the bible is real! Using that logic EVERY religious book is real if you simply use that book as proof! OBJECTIVE sources don't exist on Jesus because he is Judeo Christian MYTH!
On gun control you have been destroyed over and over! More guns=More gun deaths=More gun carnage
Where there are more guns there is more homicide
(literature review).
Our review of the academic literature found that a broad array
of evidence indicates that gun availability is a risk factor for
homicide,both in the United States and across high-income
countries. Case-control studies,ecological time-series and
cross-sectional studies indicate that in homes,cities,states and
regions in the US,where there are more guns,both men and women are at
higher risk for homicide,particularly firearm homicide.
Hepburn, Lisa; Hemenway, David. Firearm availability and homicide: A
review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior: A Review Journal.
2004;9:417-40.
2. Across high-income nations, more guns = more homicide.
We analyzed the relationship between homicide and gun availability using data
from 26 developed countries from the early 1990s. We found that across
developed countries,where guns are more available,there are more homicides.
These results often hold even when the United States is excluded.
Hemenway, David; Miller, Matthew. Firearm availability and homicide rates
across 26 high income countries. Journal of Trauma. 2000;49:985-88.
3. Across states, more guns = more homicide
Using a validated proxy for firearm ownership,we analyzed the relationship
between firearm availability and homicide across 50 states over a ten year
period (1988-1997).
After controlling for poverty and urbanization,for every age group,people in
states with many guns have elevated rates of homicide,particularly firearm
homicide.
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/hicrc/firearms-research/guns-and-death/
OWNED yet again Herb! Go crawl back into your white trash redneck bunker!
LOL..you admit defeat on Jesus
Never engaged in that debate because you would LOSE just like how you lose every other debate you inbred redneck! "The bible says so" is not evidence of the existence of Jesus!
shareThat's deflection faun. You are trying to change the subject because you've been exposed as an idiot and don't like it. Be a man, and back up your crap.
Just one name, ONE SINGLE NAME of a Carpenter from antiquity, from anywhere, for whom there is physical or objective EVIDENCE of their existence. I'm still waiting, and probably will be waiting for a very long time. Ready to admit that statement is bull**** yet? Despite what you may think, I'll think more of you if you do that, not less. Because it is the honest thing to do.
Herb, you are such a backwards ignorant redneck that you don't even know the difference between theology and history or what BURDEN of PROOF means! There are HUNDREDS of stories of gods so you believe them all just because a story exists?? A story of a god is NOT evidence of a god!
Here is a summary of how Jesus is simply Judeo Christian MYTH!
1. Fraudulent family history going back thousands of years. Two of them in fact, that differ in more than 30 ways.
2. Phony census story and contrived birth to fit some "Old Testament prophecy"
3. One story when he is about 12. Apart from that, his entire childhood and adolescence is missing.
4. A ministry in his "30s" that talks about him doing miracles for more than thousand people that no historical character ever documented.
5. He never writes or creates anything nor dictates writing to anybody. There is no Biography of Christ or Gospel of Christ.
6. Every piece of scripture is an anonymous, non-eyewitness account written DECADES after he's allegedly dead and gone.
7. The church's foremost apostle, Paul, is SHOCKINGLY SILENT about nearly every single physical aspect of Jesus Christ
8. Nobody ever physically saw him or described his appearance.
9. His empty tomb isn't venerated for centuries.
Not our debate faun. Never has been. You know that. You are simply trying to make it that way because it is so easy for you to declare victory. I'm simply trying to make you a bit more honest. Believe it or not, I want to help you.
I want you to admit that your repeated point about there being no physical evidence of Jesus of Nazareth's existence was bull****. If you do not, than do as I have repeatedly asked, and provide me one carpenter from anywhere in the Roman Empire of that time for whom there IS physical evidence that they existed. Do one of those two, and you will be a bit more honest.
Apart from that, his entire childhood and adolescence is missing.
Nobody ever physically saw him or described his appearance.
Herb, you only show what an uneducated inbred redneck you are! You have no concept of history or how it works! The Christians are the ones who make the CLAIM so the burden of PROOF is on them not me!
To help your puny brain understand do you know the difference between a mythical carpenter and a historical carpenter? EVERYTHING about Jesus is myth! No eyewitness accounts, no contemporary accounts, he never wrote a single WORD, and no historical character even mentioned he lived when the bible claims he did!
No eyewitness accounts
no contemporary accounts
he never wrote a single WORD
Herb, you are an uneducated dumbass redneck who doesn't understand how BURDEN OF PROOF works! There are stories of gods all over the world and according to your logic all those gods are real simply because a story exists!
EXPLAIN the scholarly quotes on Jesus below:
The world has been for a long time engaged in writing lives of Jesus... The library of such books has grown since then. But when we come to examine them,one startling fact confronts us: all of these books relate to a personage concerning whom there does not exist a single scrap of contemporary information -- not one! By accepted tradition he was born in the reign of Augustus,the great literary age of the nation of which he was a subject. In the Augustan age historians flourished; poets,orators,critics and travelers abounded. Yet not one mentions the name of Jesus Christ, much less any incident in his life.
-Moncure D. Conway [1832 - 1907] (Modern Thought)
It is only in comparatively modern times that the possibility was considered that Jesus does not belong to history at all.
-J.M. Robertson (Pagan Christs)
All four gospels are anonymous texts. The familiar attributions of the Gospels to Matthew,Mark,Luke and John come from the mid-second century and later and we have no good historical reason to accept these attributions.
-Steve Mason,professor of classics,history and religious studies at York University in Toronto (Bible Review,Feb. 2000,p. 36)
The question must also be raised as to whether we have the actual words of Jesus in any Gospel.
-Bishop John Shelby Spong
But even if it could be proved that John's Gospel had been the first of the four to be written down,there would still be considerable confusion as to who "John" was. For the various styles of the New Testament texts ascribed to John- The Gospel,the letters,and the Book of Revelations--are each so different in their style that it is extremely unlikely that they had been written by one person.
-John Romer,archeologist & Bible scholar (Testament)
It was not until the third century that Jesus' cross of execution became a common symbol of the Christian faith.
-John Romer,archeologist & Bible scholar (Testament)
What one believes and what one can demonstrate historically are usually two different things.
-Robert J. Miller,Bible scholar,(Bible Review,December 1993,Vol. IX,Number 6,p. 9)
When it comes to the historical question about the Gospels,I adopt a mediating position-- that is,these are religious records,close to the sources,but they are not in accordance with modern historiographic requirements or professional standards.
-David Noel Freedman,Bible scholar and general editor of the Anchor Bible series (Bible Review,December 1993,Vol. IX,Number 6,p.34)
Paul did not write the letters to Timothy to Titus or several others published under his name; and it is unlikely that the apostles Matthew, James,Jude,Peter and John had anything to do with the canonical books ascribed to them.
-Michael D. Coogan,Professor of religious studies at Stonehill College (Bible Review,June 1994)
Completely OWNED as always!
Herb, I see you are left speechless with no response! As usual you are COMPLETELY owned!
shareNope. Just don't care much about religious debate. I've told you that. Do I point it out when you don't respond to my posts? No, because it is childish and stupid. That's your way, not mine. Like a typical ***hole you are jumping to conclusions you know nothing about to satisfy your miniscule standards for 'victory'. The liberal way.
I am a bit perplexed though. Usually any responses to my posts show up in my inbox. I got no such notice for either of your past two responses on this thread. Just sort of stumbled back on it. You sure you replied to mine?
By the by. It appears you pulled all that crap off of http://www.nobeliefs.com/exist.htm
When will you stop running to obviously biased sources to back up your crap. I have no faith in God. Nor do I have faith that www.nobeliefs.com has anything useful to say about God. They are as biased on the topic as you are.
Do your own ****ing work next time.
By the by. You've still not answered. Please do.
You said, in bold face I might add, the following:
No one has the slightest physical evidence to support a historical Jesus
I've seen you make this point multiple times, on multiple boards. Obviously you believe it has merit.
In response I asked you, I believe four times now, to do the following:
Show me one other Judean carpenter from that period for whom there IS physical evidence to support their existence. For that matter, find me some physical evidence of ANY carpenter from ANY Roman province for whom there IS physical evidence
In every instance, you have not responded. You simply divert, deflect, or insult because that's all your childish mind is capable of. Either finally do as I requested, multiple times, or I want you to admit, as you should, that your argument is what it is. 100% bull****. Do that, and we can move on to something else. If you don't, you are only providing another in a heap of evidence that points to the fact that you are a dishonest, brainwashed, 100% liberal piece of human garbage. I already know this to be true, so prove me wrong.
I know this is hard for you to understand, so I'll help you a little bit. All you need to say is 'well, I guess you're right herb. Just because there is no physical evidence that has survived to this day of a 2000 years dead carpenter from a backwater Roman province, doesn't mean he didn't exist. I guess that is true, and I was wrong to make that statement. Heck, there are thousands of people who have died in the past 10 years for whom there is no surviving physical evidence of their existence. I know my logic is flawed, and I'll try harder in the future'
Say that, and I'll have a bit of respect for you on the basis of honesty.
Herb, you are OWNED and DESTROYED!
You don't understand how burden of proof works. The burden of proof is on the BELIEVER to show a certain process or thing exists! It is NOT on me! You believe stories of hundreds of gods all over the world just because a story was written? LMAO!
Look at this video by your cousin, a true redneck who assumed Jesus was real but when he looked at the EVIDENCE he realized Jesus is CLEARLY a myth! Not even the Pope can refute this! It's AWESOME and only a few minutes long:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTqyocFOMXE
Herb, you are OWNED and DESTROYED!
The burden of proof is on the BELIEVER to show a certain process or thing exists! It is NOT on me!
You believe stories of hundreds of gods all over the world just because a story was written? LMAO!
Not even the Pope can refute this!
It's AWESOME and only a few minutes long:
Fauny Boy, I see you are left speechless with no response! As usual you are COMPLETELY owned! . I love throwing your own crap back in your face.
When you are done crying like a little ***** get back on here and defend your bull**** some more. I miss that. With all your nonsense ranting about burden of proof, you should be able to come up with something to make me laugh.
"Neither did gospel writers!"
Three Gospel writers knew him. Matthew, Mark & John. If you're gonna allow hate to compel you don't allow lies to enter in.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/45841
What we have here is failure to communicate!share
Is he a 'real' bigot or is that just a worked that's bandied about that means 'somebody you don't agree with'--IE: the new definition of 'fascist'; Is it like Don Imus's "nappy haired hoes' comment?
And what lies did he tell?
And are they REAL factual errors or are they on the order of 'the nation reviews Gunter Lewy's book' & raises a stink about how he doesn't 'reverently' refer to the VC/NVA as the 'national liberation front'? IE: Is a a real SERIOUS error or a matter of semantics?
[deleted]
I am still lacking in facts as to whether or not to agree with ya.
share[deleted]
So then 75% out of wedlock births is NOT a bad thing???
Secondly: I don't know jack 'bout the guy, I don't watch him but I remember his ass on some sort of 'current events' show...
[deleted]
Oh yeah, why ask for them facts thingies...just trust your word. Listen Chump: I don't badmouth Olbie, Maddow or Schultz on MSNBC because I don't watch them...I can't comment what I don't know about. You tell me all sorts of crap about B.O'R., but you don't tell me anything you've seen or heard him say...why should I trust you? I noticed on another blog a lurk at the O'Reilly did some sort of 'retraction' for something he said RE: the MLK 50 anniversary march, but I have no idea what it was...
share[deleted]
I find it terribly offensive when some narrow-minded twit like him tries to besmirch an entire race by saying "it's the breakdown of the family, with a lack of a fathers that is to blame for Black delinquencey
[deleted]
I never miss the a-hole! I've actually taped it to make sure I hear every stupid word out of his bigoted mouth!
He says it everyday! You obviously don't watch, so why are you questioning this?
[deleted]
Incoherent eh? Y'suffer from reading disability it seems; so then:
Listen up dipstick: I asked ya a question but instead of giving me an answer you give me 'tude & bluster...you're a waste of my time with Lucy Pinder--so toodles.
You're just one of 2 or 3 numbnuts who are trying to attack Bill! You're wasting your time!
Answer the man's question, or leave. If you have no stomach for honest debate, then why do you feel the need to start trouble. ***hole.
[deleted]
Intelligent conversation is obviously not meant to be A-hole!
Bite me
Well now, Herb...this thread wound up going nowhere, didn't it. Total oxygen wastage from the opposition.
shareYeah? Well tell me what I'm 'wrong about' then. And don't you think a 50-75 % out of wedlock birthrate is a BAD thing?
PS: Ya made a funny, "Billy Idol"...LOL!
[deleted]
ooooo...are we puttin' words in me mouth, now, laddie? I said I don't comment on Olbie cuz I don't watch him (you sayin' I do watch him?) I said what does B O'R lie & about & you tell me I'm 'wrong'; the only other question I asked (Is a 50-75% out of wedlock birthrate good or bad?) has a 'yes' or 'no' answer.
PS: Please be clear in your responses; I don't want to be distracted from my Lucy Pinder Fansite.
[deleted]
I'm a Democrat, but I'm not afraid to admit that his "Killing Kennedy" is very well written.
sharepublish or perish as they say...
🎄Season's Greetings!🎄