The most glaring that I saw was the protrayal of a troubled Caesar yielding to Vercingetorix's request to kill him in private. In truth, Vercingetorix was paraded through Rome's streets in chains during Caesar's victory triumph, then publicly strangled to death. The HBO series "Rome" shows this more accurately.
Well, I'm not so sure it does. There is no extant description of the execution of Vercingetorix, but it is likely that Vercingetorix's fate was the traditional one: publically paraded through Rome during the Triumph but then
privately executed (either strangled or beheaded) in the
Carcer or, more specifically,
Tullianum subsequently known as the Mamertine Prison.
This is how Sallust describes the death of Lentulus following the Cataline conspiracy.
In the prison, when you have gone up a little way towards the left, there is a place called the Tullianum, about twelve feet below the surface of the ground. It is enclosed on all sides by walls, and above it is a chamber with a vaulted roof of stone. Neglect, darkness, and stench make it hideous and fearsome to behold. Into this place Lentulus was let down, and then the executioners carried out their orders and strangled him. (Sallust, Bellum Catilinae 55 3-5 - http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Sallust/Bellum_Catilinae*.html)
So both
Rome's presentation of the execution as public and
Julius Caesar's suggestion that the privacy was a compassionate concession seem to be of doubtful historicity.
Call me Ishmael...
reply
share