MovieChat Forums > Skins (2002) Discussion > Did anyone else find the ending to be th...

Did anyone else find the ending to be the least bit offensive?


I saw this movie in my Native American on Film class, and I found that the ending is pretty offensive. It makes the main character look like a hero for defacing a national monument which should be given respect. Yeah, we all know the old stories of the evil white-man, but give me a break.

reply

Offensive? Of course not, not if you have a brain and critical abilities.

If you chose to look past the apparent "defacement" of a "national monument" which isn't a monument to all by the way, you would see the feelings, emotions and ideas that are brought forth in the film. If anyting, you should begin to question why you are bothered by this "defacement" and question why one would ponder such a thing. There are mulitiple narratives that make up the American identity. Not everyone is a blindly patriotic conservative. It doesn't take two seconds to consider how Native people could fathom "defacing" a "national monumuent" if you actually thought about it. Don't be so willingly ignorant.

reply

The only defacing taking place there is the defacing of the Black Hills by Mount Rushmore. Even your Supreme Court agreed that the Black Hills are stolen from who they consider the legal owners, the Lakota People.

To have the faces of the leaders of your genocidal oppressers etched into your most sacred place is an afront of the highest order.

It was a great ending for that reason (best thing in the film)

reply

I could not have said that better myself. I appreciated what Rudy did to the so called "national monument." In fact the tee shirt he saw in the store with the Natives as Mt Rushmore is a shirt I WOULD BUY!




Raven
Pussycat Doll

reply

I just saw the movie last night, and I didn't find it offensive in the least! I'm only sorry he couldn't get a BIGGER can of paint up there.

reply


Totally agree with you Wolfsmile36.. it would have made the movie better. Though the only parts they showed of Pine Ridge were the ghetto-ish places.. There are better housings like Old Hospital Housing, New Hospital Housing and Cherry Hill. Mostly they just showed Northridge, Eastridge and Crazy Horse housings. Pine Ridge is bad, but at least evolved enought to not all look like that. The movie should have showed that...
--PcE--

reply

I didn't find it offensive. After all the "white man" stole the Black Hills because of their greed for gold, the Sioux were robbed of their land and to this day have not accepted the money from the us gov't. It was a sad, sad time in history for the indigenous tribes and the white man will never make up for the genocide and injustices to the native tribes. I can't wait to see the Crazy Horse monument!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

reply

didn't find it offensive but a bit funny.
couldn't have used a better color!!!
I was cheering too at the end.

reply

Unless you fast-forwarded the movie right to the end, you would have understood that Mt. Rushmore was a defacement of a natural monument. The Black Hills are a sacred area for the American Indians. For America to blast the faces of their leaders into the rock of the Black Hills is a travesty. Adding the fact that the reservation is the most poverty stricken and has the lowest life expectancy of any town in America, you should get the idea that throwing a bucket of paint off a cliff is not really that bad.

reply

[deleted]

I liked the original idea of sticking dynamite up George's nose (wasn't that the original idea?).

reply

[deleted]

Why is slapping the names of slaves on the sides offensive? Slavery existed in our country, and our founding fathers owned slaves. Why is acknowledging that fact offensive?

reply

acknowleding it isn't offensive but slapping it on a side of a mountian might be

Nobody notices the sober Indians. On tv the drunk Indians emote In books drunk Indians philosophize

reply

"Unless you fast-forwarded the movie right to the end, you would have understood that Mt. Rushmore was a defacement of a natural monument. The Black Hills are a sacred area for the American Indians. For America to blast the faces of their leaders into the rock of the Black Hills is a travesty."

Very well said GhettoMafioso! And I thought it was an absolutely splendid ending to a brilliant film!

"Shocks are so much better absorbed with the knees bent." - Lord Summerisle

reply

Come to think of it, the monument itself is like a subliminal/symbolic tasteless gesture-a slap in the face. Kinda like naming a predominantly white club in Harlem- the Cotton Club!The former example is far, far, far worse than the second-I'm just making an observation.

reply

Keesch I think you missed the whole point of that act

reply

being a blind conservative is one thing, i'm simply saying that there should be a level of respect given towards a monument that represents our country. Every country has history, and there aren't many of them that are completely innocent, but i'm tired of everyone romanticizing the native americans like they were just this peaceful little race that would never harm a soul. If you don't have enough respect for something that represents the country you live in, then you might as well leave, because this country isn't run by native americans anymore just as countries in europe have conquered over territories of other nations. Get over it . I'm an american, i don't feel connected to my german or british ancestors, so i feel i have to respect the country that i live in currently. not the one that it used to be a few hundred years ago. i'm not going to take a dump on something that native americans hold sacred (regardless of what colonizers did years ago) and i expect native americans would have the same respect. By the way, don't respond to me, because you know what, i really don't care.

"Then you leave me no choice than to play you in a game of hungry hungry hippos"

reply

Your completly missing the point ,what you as americans finds sacred ,we as natives dont ,and when it comes to the monument ,the people who bulit it didnt respect the fact that they were defacing our sacred black hills by making the monument. Not to meantion who they were honoring.If your people ,the americans didnt respect the fact that to the lakota the black hills is the most sacred place on earth to them,why would you expect us natives to respect the monument.If americans want respect they need to give it first,which they didnt and every time we indians see that monument it reminds us how you americans really feel about our culture or our sacred places.

reply

It isn't run by us anymore cause we been run over,out of our lands, put on reservations, assimilated, pushed out of our culture,taken over by others, and have to watch it all destruct (our land, languages, culture,etc.) - very hard to 'get over it' as you say. You might not feel connected to your ancestores cause you don't actually live in the UK or Germany. Apparently you haven't a clue as to respect. And btw, i care if you do or don't respond to me.

Nobody notices the sober Indians. On tv the drunk Indians emote In books drunk Indians philosophize

reply

"By the way, don't respond to me, because you know what, i really don't care."

Hypocrite.

reply

Pshh... deyy tellin uss to ruhspect... I don't tink they know thaa first thing to respect...

and besides... YEAH you might not feel connected,

but hey...

WE DO.

so derr...

how come durs so much fightin goin on...

reply

Blast that monument! That monument was a middle finger to Native Americans. These folks defaced a hill Native Americans found sacred to show who was in charge. Why the hell should some Native Americans or progressive non-natives give a good damn about offending the sensibilities of Americans who extol that monument. Native Americans were the first ones here-they do not have to necessarily respect what outsiders hold sacred when it DESIGNED offends them. If anything, everybody who is not Native and don't like this can go back to where they came from because no matter how long you stay in a country-if you are not indigenous-especially if you are a settler or benefit from the act- then you are a freaking guest!As for holding on to the past, folks wronged have as much a right to hold on to the past-if they so choose- as long as the oppressor treats them the more oppressed- as second-class. One more thing, natives have often been portrayed as so-called *violent savages* as much as they have been portrayed as *noble savages* so this goes both ways; and, pacifist or not, which is besides the point- Native Americans did not conquer the European homeland. The Europeans conquered the homelands of Native Americans!

reply

correction: When it is designed to offend them.
Also, I meant to say progressive non-Natives for that matter!

reply

Whoa . . . I grew up with people like you. So clueless about the ways you offend others as a group. The Rushmore 'monument' is to celebrate the eviction of our native people from their land. Nothing more. I would love to see the faces converted to Sitting Bull, several other leaders, and at least one Native woman. You need to realize that the Native Americans have not ever been allowed to achieve justice. No one has done similar harm to your group: count your blessings, and ask some respectful questions or try to help.

reply

I loved the movie, and the massage of the movie was right on. I jumped up and screamed "yea!" when the red paint came down!!!!

reply

Loved the ending!

reply

I find it offensive to choose to see the attempted genocide of an entire race in this country as some little mistaken blurb in a history class and instead see it as "helping" or something like that. I think it's offensive to sign a treaty promising the Black Hills (a sacred place) to the ndns there and then completely break it and carve into it the faces of people who may have helped along this discrimination. To carve up and blast away in those Hills is the equivalent of burning a church.

Yeah, we all know the old stories of the evil white-man, but give me a break.


It's that type of indifference and ignorance that helped facilitate so many atrocities. No, you are not responsible, but as long as your type of attitude prevails, they are NOT just "old stories". And what I mean by that is that your type of attitude minimizes all that has happened and looks at it as no big deal. Literally millions and millions were killed here through the advantage of firepower, killing the the vulnerable, very old and very young, diseases brought over from the filthy conditions the Europeans were immune to (fyi, they were immune because they were conditioned to literally live in sh*!ty and poor conditions (and not all transmitted diseases were through sex; there are very early examples of the first uses of germ warfare in the form of "gifts" like blankets given to the native that were from the smallpox infirmary of the nearby Army. And while we are at it, even if it was sexually transmitted, rape was very, very common). So who were really the "savages"????

The OP's entire original post is what is most offensive to me.

reply

Well put, indiegurl. I was as offended as you are by the original post in this thread; the depth of its indifference to the near cultural genocide perpetrated on this people is astounding.

I found the ending of "Skins" to be not only touching, but very metaphorical: the red tear trailing down Washington's cheek for all the crap that's occurred in the past 150 years.

FWIW, I'm White but I'm not a bleeding heart liberal. I don't need to be a liberal to acknowledge the reality of what one race did to another on this land. Anyone who tries to deny it is, quite frankly, an imbecile.

reply

You are an idiot.

reply

Why's that?

reply

Well, arrowtop, I guess it's easier to call someone an idiot than to admit the truth.

reply

"Did anyone else find the ending to be the least bit offensive?"

No.

reply

To answer the original question, no, I didn't find the ending offensive. However, I found the movie to be boring and poorly written. The brothers weren't very likeable and the dialogue was laughable. What about the flashback from the football game? Cut to night time and the brothers are still wearing their shoulder pads hours later? Haha. I was laughing out loud. The only offense this movie committed was weakness.

reply