Clearing something up..In topic about this great movie.

Not at all. White House confirmed what Washington post had written long ago, that Bosnian Muslims were illegally armed (despite the weapons embargo) by several Arab countries, and that the US was immediately involved in the process, even providing planes. Admittedly, it was Bush administration at the time when it all started.

Clinton was the one who took it to the next level by arguing there should be no weapons ban at all and that they should let Arabs import weapons (and jihadists) as much as they like. It was 1993. when things got really ugly in Bosnia.

Clinton was also the one who said to the Muslims in Srebrenica in 1995 (and I am paraphrasing one of the Muslims leaders in the defense of Srebrenica) that if Muslims manage to ''get him'' a massacre big enough, US military would get involved more directly, which it eventually did, as Muslims made sure the army of Bosnian Serbs was provoked enough (by random ambushes, burning of Serb populated villages and killing of civilians around Srebrenica by militia led by Naser Oric, called a 'criminal' by those same leaders of defense of Srebrenica, then a DEMILITARISED ZONE). Armed militia numbering around 5k, attacking from a demilitarised zone, is a target to any army. Serbs, predictably, did exactly that, falling into Clinton/Muslim trap.

Genocide is the unlikely definition for any event in the entire Yugoslavian war. Srebrenica didn't include women or children, as the killed were either actual Muslim militia involved in the aforementioned actions around Srebrenica (some buried in the famous Muslim Srebrenica memorial died in the random clashes with Bosnian Serb army much prior to the final assault) or civilians/men of fighting age, suspected to be ones. So that isn't really a genocide.

It is by no means a justifiable war crime, but it become inflated for one, clear purpose. Justify US involvement in yet another war.

Results of that politics are seen today, where Bosnia still has a huge problem with radical Islam, ISIS supporters, weapon smuggling, Al Qaeda supporting. Arab veterans of then US supported Bosnian Muslim forces were involved in 9/11 even, ironically enough.

As for the ethnic cleansing, the largest one was actually done by Croats, in August of 1995, when after several ambushes and large scale actions during the ceasefire, they expelled anywhere between 150.000 and 250.000 Serbs from Croatia in a matter of days and at gunpoint (killing between 1500-2000 in the process).

As for the responsibility for war, while I personally think Milosevic and his wife were the worst thing to happen to Serbia since WWI, and it took a decade of street riots and a literal revolution in Serbia when he was overthrown in 2000, I can't agree with that claim. The competition between the three leaders for that prestigious title is fierce.

However, despite Serbian president igniting hatred and sense of endangerment among Serbs in what he called 'Neo Fascist' Croatia, and Muslim leader trying to make an Islamic Caliphate in a multiethnic society where Muslims are a minority...I will quote a Croat police minister during the war Josip Boljkovac. He said Tudjman (president of newly independent Croatia) was the one who provoked the war, because 'He wanted it at all cost'.

He goes on to explain why, but aside from the international support, which was initially closer to Milosevic and would remain so if it wasn't for his obnoxiousness, Tudjman wanted an ethnically undiverse Croatia 'free from Yugoslavian heritage/burden', something which politics take years or decades to accomplish. Time Tudjman didn't want to invest.