MovieChat Forums > How to Make a Monster (2001) Discussion > So bad i came to imdb to look it up

So bad i came to imdb to look it up


What were they thinking?!?!?! This doesn't even fit into the catagory "so bad it's good", it's just plain bad. Most likely aimed at 12 year olds with learning difficulties, or people in thier 60's that know nothing about technology and think "This could actually happen!" The only good thing about this movie is that it makes me feel good about myself... in the same way walking past a homeless man does; My life could be worse, I could have been a part of this movie. From the ridiculous title, to the cheesy closing line; this is absolte trite in its purest form. Burn it like the Bible! Be gone evil movie, be gone!

reply

Amen. The worst movie I had seen all week untill 2 hours ago when I had the misfortune to see cruel intentions 2. Oh dear...

reply

"So bad i came to imdb to look it up"

That's exactly how I felt.

reply

Yeah, so did I ! (update : this is a totally useless commentary, sorry)

reply

I tried so hard to get into, but it just didn't work out. This movie sux!

"To say never say never, you done said never twice" Common and Mos Def

reply

"So bad I came to imdb to look it up"

It would appear that great minds think alike. This movie was baaaaaaaaaad. I'd still watch it if it was on though.

http://www.youtube.com/w/?v=UJXZ-xZu4H8
www.myspace.com/evillilelmo

reply

It would appear that great minds think alike.

Why? Have you seen any?

reply

I can't believe so many had the same idea, but what the heck that's why I'm here as well.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

this must be a record for this happening
haha
most hilarious part: when that boss dude slapped the intern
that is something that happens in parodies of movies
haha
love it.

reply

Go record go. This was a bad movie. I know the Sci-Fi Channel has a penchant for low-budget b-movies but they must have been scraping the bottom of the outside of the barrel to get this one.

reply

Just got done watching it myself on the Sci Fi channel. All I have to say is...wow. The title of this thread sums it up for me.

reply

Most likely aimed at 12 year olds with learning difficulties?

When you have porn star Julie Strain topless?
Hardly.

It's aimed solely at computer geeks to scoff at and pick holes at.

reply

if this was made for sci-fi how did they have nudity?

R.O.D the tv...nuff said

reply

Julie Strain as herself was supposed to be computer model for the main character frame.

But the movement suit which later turns evil was pretty skimpy and you could see her massive tits. She even had to jump and down while 3 guys were staring at her.

Suck it!

reply

I meant how did they get it past the censors?

R.O.D the tv...nuff said

reply

No idea. Maybe they didn't see that part of the movie.

Suck it!

reply

Hahaha

Yeah , as soon as the movie ended I was like ''...I have to look up this God Awful on IMDB ''


I`m still shellshocked from the awfulness of this movie

reply

[deleted]

I came here to... But I saw it had some potential, wasted potential... Like the potential on a genius who has gone comatose...




What spoiled it was the makers' total ignorance of videogame design (so one guy to make the sounds, another one to make the weapons and another one to make the AI... And who made the ridiculously stereotypical characters and enviroments?). The "this videgame gonna frighten you" relaly, like that's what it's about!!!

reply

Love these sorts or films, me and my mates call them 'dead head' films. Cuz it doesn't require much to watch them and you can laugh at all the retardation during it. One of my mates bought it from Blockbuster for £1.99, pretty sure thay were laughing at him when he left.

Besides, how can you hate a film with possibly one of the most retarded lines in film history:

Hardcore: This place is a dump!........I love Dumps!

It set the tone for the rest of the 'film'.


"NEWSFLASH!! You Guys can't drink then come to work, You'r not Airline pilots!!" - Dr Cox

reply

Love these sorts or films, me and my mates call them 'dead head' films. Cuz it doesn't require much to watch them and you can laugh at all the retardation during it. One of my mates bought it from Blockbuster for £1.99, pretty sure thay were laughing at him when he left.

I agree, watched this on film 4 here in the uk, nearly as bad as disaster movie

reply

Well, the movie sucked, I agree to that. "Hardcore" and Clea DuVall were good though. Hardcore was so hardcore that I just had to laugh my *BEEP* off, and DuVall is a great actress. She looked hot in the end as well..

I didn't like the other people very well, and the whole concept was really crappy.

reply

There is a lot to making a video game and to the video game industry. From what I understand (my BIL has worked at 3 or 4 different companies as a designer over the last 15 years), a lot of problems and bad things can happen in the process of making a big game. If you are not a huge company or even if you are, they cost a lot of money to make and a long time to complete. Occasionally they run out of money (as a company) and get sold to another company. Therefore, all the work they had in process also gets sold along with it (and the artists that did the work and would have made money off of the completed video game(s) get...nothing. Other than the daily salary they earned while working on them). The new company comes in, brings new designers and picks up on the game(s) where others left off. If they complete the game and bring it to market, they get the bonuses, the royalties, all the goodies. Anyways, that is how it seemed to me. That this group picked this game up half completed from some other source, either that or they were just doing the final work that needed to be done. This was obvious to me because video games of this sort take years to make, not months. We only see a few days worth of work, which to me indicated that they were doing the final work that needed to be done to get it finished. All the environments were already done, so why would they need people there designing environments?

To each their own...opinion

reply