Russians?


If the Americans faked the moon-landing, then why didnt the Russians reveal it??
That is the point that reveals that CT´s dont think out of the box. They all make it seem that all things only happens in USA.
But as a European i have a different perspective. Before every single launch into space, all space-agencies have to tell the military of the opposing site that it is not a missile fired against them.
Because the Apollo-rocket would have the Radar-signature of a ICBM on the Russians Radar-screen.
And here is the thing that reveals no moon hoax: The Russians monitored that a Rocket fired from USA, fired out of the Earths atmosphere, left the earth, and a smaller craft came back some days after. The same happended with all the missions. If the Apollo missions where faked, why didnt the Russians reveal it to the world?? It was the Cold War, for Petes sake!

Also: there were reporters in NASA´s control-center, during the mission. The Astronauts did speak with the NASA-controllers Live, and did things live. Reports have said this since. So it could not have been a tape.


But the fact is that USA DID go to the moon.
Why:
USA brought back moon-rocks. That is hundreds of pounds of rocks from the moon.
And it is a fact that they all did not come from the moon: they all came from the same planet. This is because the internal isotopes of basic elements of the rocks are of a kind that could NOT have been created by the earths crust. Seriously: dont you CT´s read, go to college and ask your proffesors?? I do.
These rocks could not have come from Meteors, because they are of the same material and have no signs of recently been burned.
All these rocks have afterwards been distributed all over the world, for all sorts of independent scientists to have made analysts on them. Thousands of scientists, who all came to the same conclusion that they all came from the moon. So it is very unlikely that the Apollo-missions where faked. Because there is no other way NASA could have got hold of so many Moon-rocks. Prope-mission would only bring back too little, and people know what mission that every single rocket is sent to do. NASA landed on the Moon - deal with it.

You can all look at this site, which debunks all the lies about the Moon Landing:
http://www.clavius.org/


PS: Do you know how many people should have been involved in such a conspiracy??
Thousands!

reply

Moon rocks don't prove that man went to the moon, no more than the laser reflector's allegedly left there.Rocks could have been retrieved remotely & some moon rocks were actually collected by the Soviet's.What i do know is, that was a lot of money that was spent to do Apollo, so with this kind of payday, skulduggery is definitely a possibility.

reply

Moon rocks don't prove that man went to the moon, no more than the laser reflector's allegedly left there.Rocks could have been retrieved remotely & some moon rocks were actually collected by the Soviet's.What i do know is, that was a lot of money that was spent to do Apollo, so with this kind of payday, skulduggery is definitely a possibility.

Very funny. The Russians got less than 1 kg of lunar soil with three landers each with a launch mass of over 5 tonnes. How could the US have launched enough missions to pick up their 380 kg of rocks without anyone noticing? How could they have documented the samples in situ, drilled deep cores, picked up large individual rocks? How could they have developed the necessary probes without anyone noticing. Why, if they had that technology, have they not used it for their Mars missions? This is beyond present-day robotic capability, never mind the 1960s.

There was certainly a lot of money spent on Apollo, and with that kind of payday, sending men to the moon is definitely a probability.

reply

Landing on the moon is easy.

You've kicked the hard part if you can build a heavy-lift booster that can get into space without shaking itself apart. (The Russian's N-1 could not.) The rest is a rehash: rendevous and docking technique, engine-burn timing and navigation, vertical-takeoff-and-landing (VTOL) and re-entry stuff. By 1968, the U.S had it all down.

No, a handful of moon rocks isn't proof. *Hundreds of pounds* of moonrocks isn't exactly proof either by themselves, but it's damn strong evidence.

Come to think of it, if you attempted the preliminary engineering on a hoax you can get away with for Apollo 11 (and get away with it six more times again!), you would quickly conclude that it would be easier to just do the real thing. Fake a moon landing? Geez, that's a lot of technical and security bases you gotta cover. Any number of things might go wrong. Like getting caught. (Nixon couldn't even get away with a simple burglary.)

With a real moon program, you at least know what the variables are, and have some control over them.

reply