MovieChat Forums > Cribs (2000) Discussion > Cribs: A Show That Highlights the Ego an...

Cribs: A Show That Highlights the Ego and Greed of 'Celebrities'.


What a load of *beep* Cribs is a show that seems to have been created for the rich and infamous to show how great they are (e.g. greedy, egotistical and undeserving of their wealth). Why the *beep* do they have all those cars, golden lavatories, egotistical portraits portraying them as Egyptian pharoahs? Because they are greedy, capitalist, egotistical, vain, lowlife morons how generally have no talent and think that it is OK to rub their wealth in the faces of others!

All of these people just highlight the problem with society. Instead of buying lavish gifts why not give money to the needy?



Regards,
The Count

The Apple Scruffs Corps, 07

"Imagine"

reply

Wow, what a waste of time you spent with such an ignorant post. So how much money have you given to the needy lately? Yes, celebrities are celebrities, but does that mean that you should stereotype each and every one of them, especially those that DO donate quite a bit to charity--in time and contribution? You are obviously the type of person that would sit up on your perch even if every celebrity donated every cent of their earnings and still rant about them.


reply

"So how much money have you given to the needy lately?"

A fair amount actually. ;-|

"You are obviously the type of person that would sit up on your perch even if every celebrity donated every cent of their earnings and still rant about them."

Not really hence I only really rant about the show-offs on 'Cribs'. And you call me ignorant?



"Jai Guru Deva, Om"

reply

Some celebrities featured on Cribs don't exactly own all the stuff they would show. I read once that Pete Wentz from Fall Out Boy's orange car was actually rented.

While watching Robbie William's Crib, it looks really familiar to Jane Seymour's castle in Bath, England, which I saw featured in a celebrities' homes article in Enquirer a long time ago. Inside and outside looked so similar.

Like alot of tabloid media form, I find it hard to believe that some of these celebrities aren't as what they portrayed themselves to be. The reality is, alot of well-known, or semi-known musicians don't get paid much as we like to believe. With the price of studio rentals, music video fees, tour merchandise, record sales paying each band member half of 3 dollars per record if they are a major label band, and who knows who else the band has to pay, it's not a real walk in the park.

Just know that MTV edits out some things for the purpose of displaying controversial stuff because it gets ratings. So truthfully, I'm not impressed by how much these celebrities brag about their homes. They'll just flaunt and get while the getting was good. I don't wish them to end up in the broken hole or to be washed-up has-beens, but it's likely to happen. It is the way it is, according to how they display themselves publicly or where their careers would end up years from now.




Jess435 had deleted her account after putting me on Ignore because she cannot handle me.

reply

Yeah there's quite a few people that have appeared on Cribs...but the house they are showing off is rented or owned by the record company.

reply

That explains a lot. I have always wondered how those no name (not mainstream) rappers can afford such big houses.

reply

"Yeah there's quite a few people that have appeared on Cribs...but the house they are showing off is rented or owned by the record company"

And they pass them off as there own?!!! Good lord, it is even worse that a thought. What a bunch of egotistical show-offs...

I don't mind Branson as he does a lot for charity.

"Jai Guru Deva, Om"

reply

I don't know. Some houses like Vanessa Carlton's weren't that extravagant.

(To A.N.)I really, truly, madly, deeply, passionately, remarkably, deliciously love you.

reply

So, it's not telling us anything new, then...

and think that it is OK to rub their wealth in the faces of others!


Some people like them doing that... That's why this show has viewers.

Instead of buying lavish gifts why not give money to the needy?


Who says they don't do that, as well?! So you've never bought a luxury for yourself, huh?











It's made from bits of real panther, so you know it's good...

reply

"Who says they don't do that, as well?! So you've never bought a luxury for yourself, huh?"

Yes but I don't buy ridiculously lavish gifts like golden toilets.

"Jai Guru Deva, Om"

reply

Well, if someone's earned their money than I say it's theirs to do as they like. There isn't anything stopping them from being philanthropic, as well. The only difference between them splashing out on something and you or I doing it is the scale of what they can afford at the top limit.

If someone thinks a gold toilet would be the perfect thing to make a place feel like home, then who am I to argue?! I might think it looks tacky, but then it's not my decision to live with it, is it?






It's made from bits of real panther, so you know it's good...

reply

You make a good point but it still just seems like vanity and egotism, which is a pet peeve of mine.

"Jai Guru Deva, Om"

reply

''Some people like them doing that... That's why this show has viewers.''

Which goes to show how moronic viewers are. People like that, with their fetishistic wankfest over celebrities, are one of the main reasons the UK still has an outdated and laughable monarchy.

---------------------
Haply I may remember,
And haply may forget.

reply

Fair enough, if you're happy looking down on people based on what they enjoy... I just say 'each to their own'.

It's a bit of a stretch linking reality TV to the monarchy... The monarchy has far more to do with the perpetuation of the class system by the people in senior government and positions of power within business... That was happening WELL before the advent of television. I admit that it could possibly encourage an apathetic bent from the populace, but then so could general disenfranchisement/selfishness. Human beings have always been lazy and avaricious; that hasn't been caused by the acceleration of celebrity culture - at the very most it's just a minor symptom of it, and there are many more contributing factors.






"Your mother puts license plates in your underwear? How do you sit?!"

reply

''Fair enough, if you're happy looking down on people based on what they enjoy...''

No, I am not happy to do that. The fact that people gain entertainment from the rich pretty much looking down on them and laughing in their faces is a problem which doesn't bring me any happiness at all, but sadness. The sooner people stop glorifying greed and excess, the sooner mankind could progress to something greater.

'' That was happening WELL before the advent of television''

I never said it wasn't. But a link can be drawn in so much that monarchists and fans of ultra-rich both share a similar mindset.

''Human beings have always been lazy and avaricious; that hasn't been caused by the acceleration of celebrity culture - at the very most it's just a minor symptom of it, and there are many more contributing factors.''

Actually, humans has not always been lazy or avaricious. If they had been the human race would not have survived long enough to even reach the classical age. Unfortunately as mankind progressed out of the primitive communist stage, inequality arose.

Marx wrote that ''religion is the opiate of the people and the sigh of the oppressed''. In the present day celebrity culture has replaced religion; it keeps people doped up and too weak to stand up for their rights. The media has become the new church and the TV execs and producers have taken the place of the clergy.

I am not against celebrities and them earning money for the work they do. Yes, I think they are a bit overpaid, but this is a problem with the Capitalist system, not on the actors or musicians themselves. However, I am against celebrities loosing touch with reality and lauding it over those who actually do benefit the country more. Why do sewage workers get less? Why do doctors get less? It is ridiculous. And why just buy any old overpriced junk just to show off your wealth and prestige. It is just too ridiculous for words and very sad that people actually spend time watching such nonsense as 'Cribs' instead of actually fighting for their own dignity and class.






---------------------
Haply I may remember,
And haply may forget.

reply

gain entertainment from the rich pretty much looking down on them and laughing in their faces


They aren't doing that.

I believe in people's right to choose, and if that includes people making choices that I don't agree with, then so be it... Quite frankly, you just come off as elitist, and it doesn't paint you in the greatest of lights.

A link can be drawn, sure, if you want to stretch it... but it's a tenuous connection.

So the alternative to being 'doped up' is to turn away from the things that they may enjoy, and listen to YOU, instead?! I'm not exactly sure how that constitutes autonomy, in itself... What you're preaching is still brainwashing; it's just doing it in reverse, and I'm afraid to say that it's arrogance in its purest form - to believe that you know better for other people than they do for themselves.

For all its faults, the media is STILL a better influence than the clergy... At least there's no 'rules' telling you how to perceive entertainment; you can absorb it in any manner that you wish (unless one buys into your argument, of course - which I don't.)

People get less because the system is unequal, but that's just how it is... It's the price of a free market, and I happen to believe that it's a bargain worth striking. The world will ALWAYS be unfair because the people in power will always want to hold stuff back for themselves... It happens with socialism and communism just as much as capitalism - maybe even more so. Greed and advancement and lust for power are just a fundamental part of human nature. Survival of the fittest.

Why did you choose to reply again to my post after five years? Have you just come out of Political Theory 101, or something?!

This is the world we live in, for better or worse... If you don't like it, then become a politician... or a hermit. Don't rail against 'the masses' that you're so desperate to change on a message board for a minor little TV show... It's just a lot of hot air!






"Your mother puts license plates in your underwear? How do you sit?!"

reply

''They aren't doing that.''

Sorry, they are. Metaphorically speaking of course.

''I believe in people's right to choose, and if that includes people making choices that I don't agree with, then so be it...''

So do I, but that doesn't mean that I agree with what people choose. Voicing an opinion on something that I find, frankly, annoying is not exactly censorship, you know. Infact, these boards are not fan boards and thus criticism should be accepted and encouraged.

''Quite frankly, you just come off as elitist, and it doesn't paint you in the greatest of lights.''

No more than the cretins who appear on the show. I can sleep at night, whereas I often wonder if those who own things simply because they want to laud it over their fellow man can. Well, I guess they can cry themselves to sleep with $100 notes.

''A link can be drawn, sure, if you want to stretch it... but it's a tenuous connection.''

No, it isn't. It is fundamentally the same. The only real difference between celebrities and the monarchy is that one does a more odious job (monarchies). Both get rewarded for what they do and fawned over by ''plebs'', both have cults of personality and people wishing to see every facet of their lives.

''For all its faults, the media is STILL a better influence than the clergy... At least there's no 'rules' telling you how to perceive entertainment; you can absorb it in any manner that you wish)''

I disagree with the media being scene as a better influence than the clergy. Both dominate the mindset of the public, both peddle propaganda and often encourage dominant political ideologies. This is not true with everyone who works in the media, just as it is not true with every clergyman.

''People get less because the system is unequal, but that's just how it is...''

It is how it is because people are often too brainwashed to actually fight for their rights. This is not always so, which is why revolutions and protests do happen every so often.

''It's the price of a free market, and I happen to believe that it's a bargain worth striking.''

And I do not. I put equality and fairness above capitalist success.

'' It happens with socialism and communism just as much as capitalism - maybe even more so''

Not quite. Though abuses do happen in socialism - and many socialist countries can be held accountable for not living up to the ideology they espouse - they usually are not as uneven and as unfair as in capitalism. You usually do not have the uber-wealthy like you do in capitalist countries. Perhaps you can call out most heads of state, but even many members of socialist governments do not have such nonsensical things as gold toilets or a few big houses littering their countries. Regardless of human rights abuses in some socialist countries, workers do have more power and more rights than they do in Capitalist countries; even in places like East German in which unemployment was rare due to the fact that they had a worker-orientated planned-economy.

''Have you just come out of Political Theory 101, or something?! [] ''

Some people like to discuss political issues related to the media on IMDB, if you don't, you can kindly leave; however, you probably do, despite your somewhat patronizing attempt at humour. I stumbled upon this board and remembered that I made a post here years ago; it is only natural that I'd check it out to see how the discussion veered.


'' Don't rail against 'the masses' that you're so desperate to change on a message board for a minor little TV show... It's just a lot of hot air!''

As per usual, a pro-capitalist tries to imply that their opponent things that railing on message boards is important; I don't. Criticizing something is not the same as trying to change something. Would I like to change ''the masses'' so that they would actually fight for their own rights and a fairer system? Yes, I would, but IMBD is certainly not the place to do this, it is simply a place to rant at, vent at or praise things (specially films, tv shows and games) that you are either a fan of or despise. In other words, IMDB is a time waster and some people do spend their time thinking about things that are important and want to find people that have similar views. The fact that there is very little criticizing for this vapid worship of gaudy excess and inequality doesn't really speak highly for the membership of this specific board.




---------------------
Haply I may remember,
And haply may forget.

reply

Well, if you think so, then you're only being self-aggrandizing by looking down on the people who WATCH the show, so... fair do's. I know which I think is worse. At least the celebrities aren't on some self-appointed mission to 'make us better people', and show us the error of our ways!

I'm not asking you to agree; I just don't think you getting on a soapbox about it is going to change things... If you don't like it and don't watch it, then fair enough, but bemoaning the fact that people don't share your opinion is pretty snobbish. We are all different people who seek different things from our TV consumption, and if some people want to live a vicarious fantasy or indulge in TV that in some ways is aspirational, then I'm afraid I don't see this conscious decision as being massively detrimental to the overall health of society.

Criticism of the show's ethos itself is fine (encouraged even, as you say... ) but implying that everybody who has ever watched it and gained some pleasure from it is a mindless drone who is symptomatic of a decaying society is the bit that may just be taking critical analysis a little too far! There are viewers who can appreciate the show for what it is (shallow and gaudy) without exemplifying those very same qualities, in their everyday lives.

Maybe - and this is a radical concept - maybe some celebrities buy things with their money (money which they are entitled to by the way!) to make THEMSELVES feel better, and not to lord it over other people?!

Monarchs are BORN, celebrities are MADE - that's the biggest difference, and I'd say that it's quite an important distinction, all told. Celebrity is also open to every kind of social class - it gives people a chance to move freely about the scale; it doesn't limit. In many ways, I'd say it's the exact OPPOSITE of the monarchy, and yet, you say you aren't drawing a tenuous connection? You were making an analogy, I just wouldn't say that it holds water. In fact, the very people who are devoted to celebrity culture are probably the section of society who are LEAST likely to care whether or not we're a monarchy or a republic. Apathy is not a conscious choice - just because someone might not object to the Royal Family, does not mean that they are similar to the institutions which have led to them keeping their place.

You seem to think that the media is an all pervasive, ominous element, over which people have no influence or power against... The media is US; it was created by us, it is a tool just like any other... We get the media we want or even deserve. There is no reason we have to passively accept everything we see, or that we can't reject this 'propaganda', as you call it. People don't because they don't WANT to; they know what it is, and they have freely chosen it... They haven't been 'brainwashed', at all.

We are not all born equal. Maybe the majority of people already see being born into a Western economy with plenty of amenities available as a pretty cushy number, and so they don't feel as though they have much to fight against. What 'rights' am I being denied? I am free enough to dissent against you on the Internet - that seems pretty fair, to me. We are not all born equal, and so trying to impose equality after the fact ironically just perpetuates unfairness, in itself... 'Fairness' as a pure concept would be good, but that could only be achieved if everybody were altruistic and good intentioned, which they are not, and never will be... You are talking about living in a Utopia which has no chance of ever coming to pass.

I like discussing politics; I was just curious as to why it took you five years to go from having some grudging common ground with me, to virtually launching a diatribe at me, overnight?

I was not a part of the way the discussion evolved... I thought we had come to the end of our brief conversation, last time.

I am only a pro-capitalist in the sense that I don't think there's a better system... I do recognise its faults.

That's the difference between you and I; I wouldn't try to 'change' anybody... If they have been afforded the power to be able to make their own decisions, then I would just leave them to get on with it themselves - which is the same basic freedom I would ask in return. You wouldn't like somebody to crusade on your behalf, if you thought you didn't need it, so why express a desire to have the same effect on other people?

Fair enough as far as your reasons for coming here go... I just happen to believe that there are far more important things to get 'righteous' about!

The fact that there is very little criticizing for this vapid worship of gaudy excess and inequality doesn't really speak highly for the membership of this specific board.


There you go, with your condescension, again (and yes, I'm being condescending towards you, also... but, I think you'll find that you started it!)






"Your mother puts license plates in your underwear? How do you sit?!"

reply

Why don't you give your TV and computer to the needy?

reply


Garbage shows like this are why I'll never have any sympathy for whiny singers that cry about people downloading their songs.

--
R.I.P. America, 1776 - 2008
Bring back Scott & Charlene to Neighbours

reply

"Why don't you give your TV and computer to the needy?"

My PC? Because I use it to keep in contacts with friends. Simple answer, sorry.

My TV? No, I want some luxuries! Although I don't watch TV that much, I do watch films (on DVD and VHS).

"Jai Guru Deva, Om"

reply

You need a TV and PC as much as those guys need a big trashy McMansion. So keep your mouth shut and tolerate other citizen's personal life choices. It's called freedom.

reply

''You need a TV and PC as much as those guys need a big trashy McMansion. So keep your mouth shut and tolerate other citizen's personal life choices. It's called freedom.''

I am sorry but that is the biggest load of BS I have ever read. A plain ol' TV is a simple luxury that helps people keeping in the know about what is happening in the world. It is hardly the gaudy display of miss-earned wealth that all the cretins on cribs have to make them seem superior to their fellow man. No one needs more than two cars, no one needs golden toilets. These things are too ridiculous.

And having the right to be an *beep* about your wealth doesn't mean you should. And something called freedom also means that I can criticize them to my heart's content.

---------------------
Haply I may remember,
And haply may forget.

reply

[deleted]