Lost a few Stars because...


1. As long as both boys were screwed and the whole gang was trying to resolve the dispute with protrated negotiations (maybe 10 minutes of the movie?), why didn't they go beat the crap out of the guy who sold it to the student second hand, and find out who stole it in the first place. Maybe guy 2 could've gotten his money back? Wasn't the 2nd hand dealer selling stolen goods? Couldn't he be persuaded to refund rather than face trouble with the authorities? Which leads to my second question...

2. Are there any cops in Beijing?

3. If there are, do people in China just stand and stare at a kid getting beaten up, or do they call the police?

This flick was like Kitty Genovese meets Lord of the Flies.

That's not to say I didn't enjoy it, because I did. The performances were painfully wonderful, but if it's a representation of life in Beijing as a teenager, I might opt to stay in the country and be dirt farmer. Those kids seemed as nihilistic and insensitive as anything we have to offer in the US.

reply

I'm totally with you, flagday! I loved the cinematography, seeing urban China, and some insight into the Chinese culture, but Beijing Bicycle's script left much to be desired; some parts of it really grated on my nerves.

Guo Liangui was a naive country boy, but not as idiot. If he would have only opened his mouth, he could have easiliy proved the bike was his.

1)The bicycle was first owned by the messenger-delivery service. Surely his employer would still have his bicycle's serial number on file, and surely the police would have gotten his bicycle back from Jian with that proof from his employer.

2) On a lower level, was Jian's questioning gang of bullies too blind to notice that the bicycle model was standard issue for Guo's delivery service, and that Jian just magically got enough money to buy one?

Although, had Guo Liangui reported the bike theft to the police, the movie would have been an hour shorter; however, the lack of common sense took away from my overall movie enjoyment. Having said that, I'd still rather watch something like Beijing Bicycle over most of the garbage that comes out of Hollywood nowadays.

reply

You said:
"Guo Liangui was a naive country boy, but not an idiot. If he would have only opened his mouth, he could have easiliy proved the bike was his."

Yeah, I wondered about that. Is there such a class hierarchy in China that a country bumpkin is socially prohibited from responding openly in Beijing to questioning by cops/bullies by saying "Look MFrs, I worked hard for this bike, for a whole month, and I'm not letting some city boy take it away from me." And then using your very valid points (even if the serial numbers were missing - are they on the handle bars and ?? which were changed? --- he works for a messenger service, those are the bikes used by the messenger service, his was stolen and is on the black market within....hours?...

He just seemed a little too inately smart to just clam up and keep saying "it's my bike" and not offering any better defense.

Having said that, it was still a very good movie. I'd still like to know if the plot holes which troubled us both could somehow be culturally explained away.

reply

‘Beijing Bicycle’ was filmed in 2001, I don’t think any of you can even begin to imagine how different China was just four years ago.

‘Are there any cops in Beijing?’
yes, but the boys were mainly fighting in the ‘Hu Tongs’ in Beijing – the residential areas of ‘Old Beijing’ where the police don’t patrol usually.

‘If there are, do people in China just stand and stare at a kid getting beaten up, or do they call the police?’
why would the little old ladies and old men who see them fight want to get involved?! They probably all live in the same ‘Hu Tong’ and probably knew the boys, if they interfered, the boys would make their lives hell.
They boys who were causing the trouble looked richer than the main character, his family was probably high up in the communist society. Anyone who reported their son to the police was not only going to get trouble from the boys, but more seriously their fathers, who were probably high officials who could stop the reporters income, turn them out of their homes etc.
Now would you call the police?!

‘if it's a representation of life in Beijing as a teenager’
yes it is, frequently live is like this for the poorer classes

‘Guo Liangui was a naive country boy, but not as idiot. If he would have only opened his mouth, he could have easiliy proved the bike was his.’
How? He was is not educated like the bully, who looked like he went to a public school and looked affluent.
Guo Liangui cannot express himself very well, and everyone would believe Jian. Even if people believed him, they would not support him. Its better to makes friends with the rich, popular kid than the poor country kid, otherwise you’ll be treated like him too.

‘The bicycle was first owned by the messenger-delivery service. Surely his employer would still have his bicycle's serial number on file, and surely the police would have gotten his bicycle back from Jian with that proof from his employer.’
Do the police have nothing else to do than chase after stolen bike cases in a country of more than 6 billion people?! People’s bikes get stolen every few hours in Beijing! Who would care especially if it’s a poor country kid?!

You might be all sentimental and say ‘but the police are there to help people, is he not human just because he is from the countryside?’
People in China, and the Police are no exception, work for money, status and a quiet life. They cannot afford to work for a sense of justice.

To understand the film. Imagine living in a country with the largest population in the world.


reply

Thanks for answering my questions, except for one: Plot hole involving Jian, the kid who bought the bike second hand - if the old folks could get in trouble for reporting a fight couldn't Mr. Black Marketeer get in trouble for selling a stolen bike if one of the daddy officials gets told about it? The movie just skipped over this. Any explanation for that one?

It's interesting to see how communism has so miserably failed in China if this movie accurately portrays the "classless" society which was its goal. That poor kid was a worker, and treated lower than dirt while the nouveau riche are pampered, patted and showered. The worker can't even get back the implements of his trade. And the people in the neighborhoods have to fear losing their homes for demanding public peace. If threats are the way the officials exercise control, I could see how they don't want the populous exposed to the rest of the world via the internet.

It's not sentimentality or delusions about the perfection of our system of justice that makes me most disturbed. It's the sense of importance of the individual which I think Americans typically possess "I know my rights!" while in China it appears to be "I have no rights unless granted to me, and I'm not sure what they are, and whatever I have can be taken away arbitrarily so I'll keep my mouth shut." Whew. We may not get protected by the cops or vindicated in the courts, but at least we can express RAGE and that's some outlet. Is this timidity a matter of thousands of years of culture or 55 years of communism or feeling like such an insignificant entity in such a vast population or a little of each one? The strain on everyone in this movie is obvious.

I don't agree with you in one respect. We don't know if Guo can express himself well---he's very quiet, not stupid. I know Guo's a country kid, likely uneducated, and he couldn't debate these guys (one of whom was in the top 5 in his class) on some esoteric subject, but he didn't have to be eloquent to present his side of the story. The kid appeared to have loads of common sense, principles, focus, perserverence, and a greater sense of justice than all of the educated folks around him. He shamed them all. I thought honor was a big deal in China. I admired him alot. Having heard what you said though, I guess in facing a gang of the elites who had no respect for him, passive resistance may have been his only option. I had to wonder what happened to him after the end credits. I hope that rich kid just got enough of a bump on the head to make him think twice about bullying. If he was really hurt, looks like the Guo would lose more than his bike.

I have this movie on a 5-day rental. I think I'll watch it again tonight with this new intelligence at my disposal.

Thanks again.

reply

‘If threats are the way the officials exercise control, I could see how they don't want the populous exposed to the rest of the world via the internet.’
Did you know that this is a film made by a Chinese underground production? The Chinese government would never approve of this film because it shows the failure that of the communist Chinese government. The director wanted to show the world the realities of life in China.

‘Plot hole involving Jian, the kid who bought the bike second hand - if the old folks could get in trouble for reporting a fight couldn't Mr. Black Marketeer get in trouble for selling a stolen bike if one of the daddy officials gets told about it?’
What?! I don’t understand your question! Jian didn’t buy the bike second hand, he just stole it, so who’s Mr. Black Marketeer? Plus his dad did go crazy at him because he knew the bike wasn’t his.

‘It's the sense of importance of the individual which I think Americans typically possess "I know my rights!"’
Human rights are a HUGE debate regarding China. Do you know how many people have been exiled, jailed or executed because they wanted to claim this right in China?

‘We don't know if Guo can express himself well---’
I think I have already answered this question. I would support Jian also, even if I knew Guo was right. If I give support to Guo, Jian would turn all my friends against me and make my life hell, I would probably be treated worse than Guo for betraying Jian. Did you see how violently the boys beat Guo when they confronted him? There are not there to judge his story, they are there because they want to experience the thrill of beating someone up. The director wanted to show the primordial instinct inherent in those teenage boys who lusted after blood. An perhaps more familiar example can be found in ‘Lord of the Flies’ by William Golding

‘I thought honor was a big deal in China. I admired him alot’
You are supposed to.

‘I hope that rich kid just got enough of a bump on the head to make him think twice about bullying.’
I thought they became friends by the end! I think Jian is amazing!









reply

Thanks for the insights AngelKitty911.

No, I didn't know this was an underground production. I just assumed anything presented in part by "Beijing Film Studios" and filmed in Beijing would have to been watched or approved by the PRC. I would think censoring the script would be a prerequisite to filming in Beijing--no? The end result certainly wasn't complimentary to the PRC but in very subtle ways.

Plot Hole Involving Jian: He did buy the bike--he stole his sister's school money to buy the bike second-hand. Sister's the one who snitched on him and Jian had his tirade in the alley accusing his step-father of favoring his half-sister and of breaking promises to him. Dad went crazy for both reasons, first for thinking it was stolen, then realizing Jian stole the family's money to buy the bike. Did Jian know it was stolen property when he bought it? Common sense says yes but the filmaker didn't go into that or, again, explain why the guys wouldn't hunt the black marketeer down to get his money back or tell Daddy Official. So the question remains, why? Talking about an underground economy selling stolen goods may not have passed PRC censorship.

We agree on the Lord of the Flies. I also had said relating to the gang violence that it reminded me of Kitty Genovese meets Lord of the Flies. (If you're not old enough to remember, Kitty Genovese was a young woman beaten to death on the streets of Queens crying for help while scores of people just watched...a little more complicated than that but the general idea was that our neighborhoods had turned into hostages of fear and apathy).

I don't sense that Guo and Jian became friends. I think they ended up understanding and respecting the other, but they weren't friends. When Jian was being chased, Guo was just trying to get out of the neighborhood but kept getting lost---he didn't come to Jian's aid---that was good, no phony Hollywood heroics. Guo walked away with a destroyed bike and Jian was out the money. Jian was borderline suicidal at that point, after he'd attacked the showoff biker---about the bike "you take it. I won't be needing it." He gave up. And Jian was not one of the rich kids---he was a poor kid in a school full of rich kids--in the top 5 in his class, under way too much pressure. I felt so sorry for him, but he really snapped stealing the family's money and hitting showoff biker, in front of witnesses, like he had nothing to lose. With his brains, if he gets through this he'll be a star. I heard the suicide rate in China is something dreadful---I don't know if it's any worse than in west. But now there's a whole new set of pressures being applied.

The rich kid I was referring to was the remaining one after everyone else in his gang fled. He had a dyed mop-top haircut, round glasses, dangling cigarette and had been leaning against the outside wall of the courtyard. He started smashing the bike, jumping on it, and was in a trance of sorts when Guo was begging him to stop. He's the one who got the brick to the back of the head from Guo. So if he wasn't killed (which could've easily happened with that kind of blow), maybe he'll have learned something too. One on one you're not so tough. Violence begets violence, etc.

I just had an uneasy feeling at the end of the movie that it wasn't yet over for poor Guo. If he doesn't get beaten up anymore, then he'll do ok too. Hard worker and "stubborn."


Again, thanks for the insight. I love Chinese films but I am definitely a foreigner watching them, and find so many things puzzling to me. Unless you've lived there, it's hard not to watch a movie through the lens of your own values and culture. I guess that's why I hear so often that a certain movie so popular in the west was not well-received in the east, and vice-versa.

Xiexie, xiexie! (So far only phrase I've mastered in my study of Mandarin!)

reply

'He did buy the bike'
really? i need to watch the movie again...

'I don't sense that Guo and Jian became friends. I think they ended up understanding and respecting the other, but they weren't friends.'
true, true, i just ment they seemed to stoped hating eachother, like Japan and the US are 'friends', actually no, i should abandon that, because the word 'respect' was mentioned

'Kitty Genovese'
non, je sais pas

'I heard the suicide rate in China is something dreadful'
due to pressures at school you mean? that's true. parents push thier child so hard to do well. partly because they put all their expectations on their only child. also because there are so many people in China, you have to work hard to make yourself stand out for employers etc.

'So if he wasn't killed (which could've easily happened with that kind of blow), maybe he'll have learned something too.'
'I just had an uneasy feeling at the end of the movie that it wasn't yet over for poor Guo.'
i agree.

'Unless you've lived there, it's hard not to watch a movie through the lens of your own values and culture. I guess that's why I hear so often that a certain movie so popular in the west was not well-received in the east, and vice-versa.'
its so difficult to involve westerners emotionally in a film about culture etc. which is why films like crouching tiger hidden dragon are so successful in the west due to their pretty visuals rather than deplicting a harsh reality, like beijing bicycle.

reply

en tout cas , c'est vraiement un très bon film!

reply

All I know that this is a good movie, very touching and stuff. Most impportantly, it shows how life could be so unfair. Depressing movie. On my top ten list. It's like watching a good French movie only its chinese.

reply

Hi, everybody.
I just couldn't resist to write how much I liked this film. But I really liked the music. I tried to find the CD online, but nobody heve ever heard about it...Does anybody know how to get the soundtrack from thi movie?
thanks

reply

"No, I didn't know this was an underground production. I just assumed anything presented in part by "Beijing Film Studios" and filmed in Beijing would have to been watched or approved by the PRC. I would think censoring the script would be a prerequisite to filming in Beijing--no? The end result certainly wasn't complimentary to the PRC but in very subtle ways."

Most chinese good movies are killed off by censoring apartment. e.g. "Huo zhe"
"Ba wang bie ji"

"Did Jian know it was stolen property when he bought it?"

of course he knows but he doesnt care. actually in china, it's very common to buy stolen bikes .they are cheap and sometimes u can find brand new bike in the stolen market and half priced.

reply

[[[Most chinese good movies are killed off by censoring apartment. e.g. "Huo zhe"
"Ba wang bie ji" ]]]

Please explain. Are scripts censored? Can you film in Beijing without censorship? Can an uncensored film be shown in China? Was Bejing Bicycle shown in China?

"To Live" and "Farewell my concubine" are the examples cited above. They were "killed off" by the censoring department? Meaning, what?

Thanks Zhaoke.

reply

"Please explain. Are scripts censored?
because communist party is the sovereign(correct spelling?) power in china, and "beijing bycycle" exposed some "dirty dots" in the government system and social system , of course they will oppose it. i thought ( not sure) they send the script to the censorship apartment but didnt get approved.

"Can you film in Beijing without censorship?"

yes you can. all you need is script, actor, equipment, director and of course money. there are a lot uni students, no matter which city, nowaday interested in movies try to make their own movie by DV.

"Can an uncensored film be shown in China?"

no, not in the big commercial cinemas. but you can probably find them in some smaller private cinimas.

" Was Bejing Bicycle shown in China? "

no, and we are really pissed about that. ^^

" "To Live" and "Farewell my concubine" are the examples cited above. They were "killed off" by the censoring department? Meaning, what? "

killed off means didnt get approved. reason is simple, everything in china is under the supervision of the invisible super power of politics, movies, music, TV, ecnomic, ect. because these two movies strongly implied the dark side of chinese government, or once upon a time of chinese (understandable?), so they "died".

i need my english improved. ^^

hoping these can help

reply

Thank you Zhaoke, and I'm surprised to see that English may not be your first language.

So the bottom line is that the new China is capitalist enough to open its arms to movie industry money but still communist enough to decide which films its people get to see. That tension cannot last forever. A little freedom has a nasty way of turning into demands for a lot of freedom.

Good luck to you.

reply

i watched this film years ago. i dont think police will care to get involved in china. stolen bikes are common, out of millions of people, too many cases like this. and bikes dont worth much. plus its a little country boy, what benefit/money can the cops get out of him?

in general the public is not helpful too coz helping could mean trouble for those who have helped.

I think you should have added a few stars because it portrate the real life in China instead of losing a few....

reply

You're right Writeyibo. After reading all these explanations I added back a star. So now it's at 8 of 10. That's about right for this movie and in my rating scale methodology, very high. Thanks for your comment.

reply

I may be wrong, but i thought it looked like Guei didn't read too well. There are the scenes near the start where he is copying out characters in his notebook.He must have been able to read a bit but maybe not too well.

The military police in China are incredibly corrupt, and the justice system in practise is almost completely arbitrary. There is often considerable predjudice against those from the country as the dialects they speak are often quite different. So much for the Maoist ideal of the peasant being respected as the producer of food.

Excellent movie, replaces Romeo & Juliet (modern version) on my top 10. Up there with Battleship Potemkin and Apocalypse Now hahahahhaha

reply

Actually, he was counting. Each line represents a "1", the repeated character in his notebook is a chinese character meaning "5". This is a standard way of counting in China and Japan, comparable to our western way of drawing 4 vertical lines with a crossing diagonal one.

reply

Good point on the tallying system, but he was actually tallying up all of the money he made from deliveries. That's another good example of how he was manipulted and exploited; his boss was trying to short-change him by two days on his deliveries. And as to the point of illeteracy, I'm not sure he could read very well.

reply

The comments on the police and passers by would be true in any urban area I think (with possibly a few exceptions). I live near Chicago, and the police have a LOT more things to do then investigate stolen bicycles.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

I have lived in Beijing, so i thought i would respond to the post. In my experience, this film was extremely accurate in capturing beijing life. it is the best movie i have seen to get a real sense of the city - how diverse and active it is and the different ways people live.

to your specific questions:

1) selling stolen goods is so common in china that it would be hard to do anything about it. i'm sure that the second hand dealer, if he could be located, would just say that he got it from someone else and he didn't know it was stolen.

2) not many. its weird, because you hear so much about china being a police state, but if you are in an out of the way area it feels like you can do anything. in general they do a really good job guarding banks and government buildings, and occasionally venture into commercial districts, but are rarely seen in poor residential areas like the hukous in this movie.

3) people wouldn't call the police, but they might intervene. however, chinese people are often wary of stepping into other people's business. kids fighting might not be seen as a big deal. (another thing to keep in mind is that some violence, for instance the earlier scene of the father hitting his son, is far more normal and accepted than we would be used to.)


i think you are right to say that this isn't a lifestyle that you would want to have. the wonderful thing about this film is that it is a lifestyle that many people have, and this is the first time their story has been told.

reply

Finally someone who gets it!

Hell, even in the USA, do anyone know anybody who ever got back a stolen bike? Cops ignore in general....especially if the kid makes a request.

reply

I had some of the very same problems you did with this otherwise billiant film.

reply

the movie was very brilliant. even before i read comments about the film (after i saw it), i could really understand what kind of story the makers were trying to tell. And what better way to tell it than to use one of the millions of bicycles in Beijing alone. I think those who have problems understanding the film need to get some insight, and especially the Americans - dont be blinded by your misled authorities on China, its home to one of the most advanced civilisations in history, the present, and probably the future.

reply

some of the users aboves has made many good points and explainations so i will not bother repeat again, here i just wanna give two real life examples here in uk (im a british chinese) examples to the questions of 'why no polices were invovled' and 'why people just stared and do nothing', and you can draw your own connections and thoughts after that.....

real life incident one-- after a single mother and her disabled daughter has repeatly been harrasled, bullied, and assaulted by gang of local young thugs for more than 10 years, after the mother has contacted police athority many times asking for help but was ignored and told to just draw the curtains and avoid the gang, in 18th september 2009 (yes it JUST happened!!) she finally couldnt take it any more and committed suicide by setting her car on fire with herself and her disabled daughter in it....

real life incident two-- sometimes ago i seen a hallowing documentry about society and crimes, on it was one story about two teenage girls whom got harrasled on the bus by a gang of elder girls and then attacked burtally right in front of many adult passagers, the girls screamed for them to stop and pleaded for help (statement of the victim herself from the documentry, as sick and unbelievable as it might sound to some) yet everybody ignored her and didnt want to get involve, and worse yet, one elder lady even turned to 'sssshhhh!!' at her and told her to be quiet before turn the back to her once again like everyone else......

now, if something sickening like this could even happened to the good old law enforcement and out-spoken rightous citizens of the western civilized society, what chance of chinese polices and fearful citizens doing any better when corruption were high&wide and the selfishness of human nature always put our own safety before others (of course, i know not everybody are like that but sadly, there are also tragdies like the two i mentioned above and many more that were never been told)

---------------------------------------------


oh and regarding to the question of why they didnt go back to the black marketeer to trace the source of bike, one could be that it was from a mobile dealer whom could well be the thief itself, stealing selling and then moving onto the next hot spots, so it would be difficult for the boys to find again (ive encountered 'man in a van' whom drives to different towns selling 'bargain stuff'); or like someone mentioned above, the boys didnt really care about the true source of the bike, they were just out for some aderdline-pumping (cant spell to save a fish' life) action since guei seemed like an easy cherry to pick, and also, it might not be wise for them to go challenge the black marketeer for info/refund, since people in that line of business might well have some sorta tough background/dodgy connections behind them (after all it IS illegal business) and more than the boys can chew off, and beside, even if the boys are not afraid of the the dealer, what make them think the dealer would give up and betray his/her source of bargain loots/stocks just to please a bunch of school kids? would you? i know i wont...^^ heh so yea, with so many possible reasons, there are no reason for those boys to go through all the harssle of dealing with the black marketeers when they know they could easily took advantage of a country pumpkin.

another thing- lot people mentioned the class diversion between those boys but rarely point out the reigion diversion also plays a big part in their conflict, beijing is the capital city of china and typically, the locals are somewhat proud of their geography advantage and some are predjuice against outsiders thinking they are superial cos of the captial statue, this can apply to whatever other capitials of whichever country you are from and im sure you can just picture that same sorta idiots, cant you? so yea, guei being the outsider country pumpkin made him even more vurnable to attacks, and same reason why he was too afraid to speak up or defend himself, cos he knows a lone outsider himself cant win against the proud and better educated locals so the only thing he could do was grind his teeth and cling onto the bike and bears whatever they thrown at him....

reply

Hahah I know I am about a year late for this reply, but I just saw the movie on free-to-air TV in Australia. I've thought of a couple of answers to your questions (?)

1. It does make sense to go after the douchebag who stole Gui's bike and sold it onto the kid. However, there are a couple of alternative explanations for this. The kid and friends do not care about the 2nd hand seller, but they only want to get the bike back, as anything less would make them look 'soft' (they say so when they seeminly pressure the kid into going after Gui again). Also, it's simply easier for them to beat up a country bumpkin to take the bicycle rather than to have to deal with a professional thief. The weak, uneducated is exploited throughout this movie and I felt that this movie was so tragic and sad for Gui...

The movie was not entirely clear, I believe on purpose, whether or not the kid actually bought the bike from an illegal source or stole it outright himself. He simply could have spent 500 yuan by wasting on the good looking school girl, going to arcades and so on. He threw away money to impress the girl (evidenced by the scene where he pays for the public phone and seems to not care about how much it costs), he says he 'already spent a lot of money' when his friends ask him for change at the arcade and he overreacts (in a guilty way) when his friend jokes that he had stolen the bike. Also, there is no evidence of the kid purchasing the bike from a 3rd person, apart from his words which do not seem all that credible (he already stole money from his parents and lied about it upon being questioned so he is a thief and a liar).

2. The question of existence or effectiveness of legal authority in China isn't something that is really addressed in the movie. Gui does have a couple of brushes with the law, once at the spa with two security guards and another when he was caught sneaking around the bike lockers. In the latter case, he escapes any punishment because the manager of the courier company comes to save the day. If it weren't for him, he could very well have been in jail for intention to steal or trespassing, but it is something that really depends on Chinese criminal codes which I am not too familiar with.

In any case, I seriously doubt that a minor dispute between 'kids' over a 500 yuan bicycle would be worth being looked into by the police in a city of millions... As for the fights, they do get pretty serious (I mean.. hitting someone's head with bricks?) but I think by showing such brutality and dangers in the characters' actions, the film is highlighting their desperation. Again, what is tragic about this, is that situations like are mass group chases, potential violent assaults (a kid stalking a couple with a brick in his hand) largely go ignored by the people in the background. They seem completely at peace despite all the commotion around them. Perhaps this is a social commentary at how the government trivialises and hides various social problems at a mass scale - but I could be overreading here.

Also, Gui can't really do anything about being beaten up - he has no money for lawyers nor does he have any friends or witnesses that he can rely on. He is almost completely alone (apart from the grocery shop owner but he seems pretty useless) in a huge city and cops would be way too busy to help him out with such 'petty' issues.

reply

The miracle of the internet. I received a notification and voila, I get to read answers to question I barely remember posing?

There were a lot of thoughtful and informed answers to my questions (see above).

But you brought up something I don't remember thinking about before, i.e. the kid could've stolen the bicycle. True, true. Why not? He is a little thief, and a "school boy" who wouldn't look at suspicious at the bike racks.

As for the involvement of the authorities, for a stolen bike you don't get much service here either. But for a bike theft ring and black market, maybe they could've gotten some help. But again, that was discussed above by people who lived in Beijing and I'll take them at their word.

Gui really broke my heart in this movie. I hate seeing a kid tormented like that, an underprivileged hard worker no less.

Thanks for the thoughtful reply.

reply

I'm from the UK. In Scotland there are roughly 5 million people (compared to 13 million in Beijing alone!). I had a bike stolen, I live in a small town with perhaps 10,000 people maximum. I did not get the bike back. Just to put it in context.

My issue with this film is, why were Jian and his friends so obsessed with that bike? Why not just steal another one? It's obvious that Jian stole the first one and burned all of his dad's money playing the arcades and things. So why not just go out and steal another bike?

reply