MovieChat Forums > House of Mouse (2001) Discussion > Sad, pathetic, charmless, unintelligent ...

Sad, pathetic, charmless, unintelligent piece of crap.

posted 17 years ago by tommypezmaster
7 replies | jump to latest

I had very low hopes for this TV show after seeing "Not So Goofy" in Toon Disney. Usually when the channel raves about something, they're desperate for viewers and try their best to over-hype it. They did the same thing with "Baby Looney Lunes", another pathetic animated spin-off.

This cartoon is not that Original. This was on the wrong channel. Why does Toon Disney allow to make their own charaters to look bad on their Channel?!(not that it matters to fans) First of all, Toon Disney's stupid and they'll allow ANYTHING on their Channel, Inculding a South Park rip-off called "The Weekenders". But I'm talking about back in 2000, when ABC made this bad spin-off, it Insulted the ORIGINAL Mickey Mouse. It was SO bad, that over 20 usernames, liked about this cartoon and told the world how good it really was. But there some good and bad things about this toddler show, They should have put it on PBS kids or Playhouse Disney Like they made a Block on Nick, which we all know is Nick jr. This cartoon gets a D-. here the results or whatever.

Voice-acting: E+ 3.0/10.0 Mushu's Voice is Garbage and sucks a Devil's *beep*!!!!!!

Animation: D 4.0/10.0 The charcthers and backgrounds are Poorly drawn. But the Colors are like an Art House.

Graphics: E 3.0/10.0 Not what I expected. The graphics are broken, busted and a bit Buggy.

Sound: C 6.0/10.0 Rock Music with classic cartoon sound effects. That is quite fair enough.

Dialouge: F-- 0.0/10.0 Worthless, Pointless and Gar-boge!

Eductional Value: F 2.8/10.0 This dosen't teach kids anything AT ALL. It teaches kids how to thorw Tantrums, Start Fights, EVEN screw up other People's stuff such as, Other kids toys, Computers, Video game consoles (I saw one epiosde called: Dining Goofy, where Mushu, Timon, & Shere Kong yelled at Goofy & said that his service is alful & Goofy accidentally thoaw his food at Hadies) and More. That's stupid! People saying that service is alful?! That console they played must be OLD!

Lasting Appeal: C+ 6.5/10.0 There's an Itty bit of a Lasting Appeal in this poor spin-off. WHO CARES!

Overall: C- 5.8/10.0 Lots of people happen to hate this cartoon for toddlers and rant it here, The show was a good idea, but it's on the Wrong Channel. This cartoon for the tikes Litteraly came from nowhere and Nobody should watch this for Disney Fans. All right. That's the End of my review for one of Disney's first AND Lame Toddler shows. Good Night everyone.

[–] BuckinghamAlice 16 years ago

This isn't a show for toddlers. It's a show for kids... there's a difference. It's not meant to be educational, just entertaining.

"Sigh no more, ladies, sigh no more."

[–] chipandluna 16 years ago

Sad, pathetic, charmless, unintelligent piece of crap.

Yeah, we all know you are.

~::~::~
The midget I'm dating could be my daughter! ~Denny Crane

[–] RemusMoon 15 years ago

I know he posted this 2 years ago, but if he hates House of Mouse THAT much, then God knows how long his rants are gonna be when he sees the new Disney crap.

[–] TheLittleSongbird 14 years ago

I like this show, it isn't pathetic or unintelligent, it is entertaining and fun. Plus it is better than some of the real crapfests airing on Disney channel right now.

"Life after death is as improbable as sex after marriage"- Madeleine Kahn(CLUE, 1985)

[–] Zoyer 14 years ago

I thought it was one of the better Disney cartoons released over the past decade. Perhaps they couldn't have held a candle to the classics, but they essentially did their own thing. Either way, it didn't exactly tarnish the legacy of the old school shows.

[–] unapologetic_mocker 14 years ago

I really enjoyed this show. I don't think it achieved it's full potential in terms of utilising film characters and the cartoon shorts weren't exactly the standard of the classic toons but it was really enjoyable and definitely one of the better kid's shows around at the time.

For me you killed your whole argument with the educational value comment. I DESPISE these new kids shows which are intent upon "educating" rather than entertaining children. The likes of "Little Einsteins" and these modern, interactive, multi-sensory bullsh*t shows sicken me. It's one big marketing tool for gullible, inattentive parents to make themselves feel better about dumping their kid in front of the tv instead of interacting with them themselves. The greatest minds of our time to date did not need this crap to develop and neither do the kids of today IMO.

House of Mouse had it right. It was designed to entertain kids and IMO it succeeded.

[–] koholintisland 10 years ago

You're over-analysing. Relax, it's a fuggen cartoon.