I haven't seen this, but I'm pretty sure this movie is aimed at young children. You can't watch it expecting it to be an academy award nominee. You have to watch it for what it is, a kid's movie.
shareThis movie is not as bad as the boards suggest. It is no worse than "Cats & Dogs: The Revenge of Kitty Galore", or "Cool Dog". But this IS a bad movie, it just doesn't deserve the #1 spot in the Bottom 100.
shareI actually love this movie. I couldn't wait for it to come on satellite (that's the first time I saw it), and I watched the entire thing and loved it.
_________
http://cacb.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/trolls.gif
[deleted]
Even as a kid's movie it's still an awful movie no matter what way you cut it. The story is beyond nonsensical and idiotic, the acting is appalling( why Jon Voight why?), it's hard to find anything that's worthwhile in this whole movie. I don't even think most kids would find this entertaining they'd probably find it either too dumb to sit through or get bored by it easily.
That this is actually getting not one not two but THREE more sequels is just sad. Hopefully nobody watches them.
I've got an ignore list longer than a Chinese phone book.
It truly is that bad.
You can knock on Ed Wood but it won't do you no good 'cause all of my heroes are dead in Hollywood
[deleted]