Just curious - in a round where all the players answer correctly, how is it possible that there is a weakest link?
Imagine this scenario: the players all answer correctly, resulting in them banking the full 1,000 pounds. Only one person banks any money, and most of the players have only answered 1 question (correctly). In my view, there is no weakest link in this scenario, yet the announcer always names someone as being the weakest link.
Any clues?
[deleted]
They also always name "the strongest link." Am I wrong that for that category, in case of a "tie," they give credit to players who banked money?
I think the number of questions answered, whether or not they were answered correctly (maybe even when Anne 'accepts" a certain answer it makes a difference), banking and the time it takes to answer the questions all play a factor in deciding who's the weakest/strongest link.
I was a teenage movie title clichéshare
I don't think that ever happens, since most of the contestants are idiots anyway. I think it might also be how fast it took for each person to answer if that ever did happen.
shareI was watching a repeat on Challenge TV the other day, and I think this happened. I was only half watching. They got to the £1000 and nobody got a question wrong. They had to come up with reasons to vote people off. Like one hesitated too long answering the questions or whatever.
A lot of people did seem to chose the same person.