MovieChat Forums > Ripper (2002) Discussion > This is who the killer is and details to...

This is who the killer is and details to help you understand.


First of all notice when the detective shows up when molly looks out the window, no one has been killed yet and notice he has a glove on one hand and not the other. After the first murder the detective shows up again, this time he talks to molly still we see one hand with a glove and the other no glove. Molly then goes to the murder scene and finds the detective, and listen to how he describes her screaming and so on. Also, again we see one hand with a glove and the other no glove.

Ok still with me.

Now remember after the 2nd murder of the stupid blond and the class scene and all when the professor is going to his car and is startled by the detective. Remember how the detective said he didn't believe molly's theory, well he said "maybe no motive at all" and laughs. Also notice that when he asks if he can keep the professors book you see once again the one hand holding the book has no glove, and the other hand does. Remember when molly stabbed the guy on the boat in his left hand. Notice how the detective has that exact knife from the boat. Ah following me on this one. He was also the lead on the case and now he is again the lead detective. Also do you notice the detective always has a butcher knife on him even at the professors home.

Notice when they are at the professors home when molly sees the necklace and then is startled by the professor, well the prof sees the necklace and picks it up and goes after molly. Then as the professors is knocked out by the detective he pulls the necklace out of the professors hand. The detective can keep any evidence he likes if nobody knows, plus he has access to blood samples and the morgue ah still with me.

The professor is really executed, that is not molly's dream, cause his voice is the dub not hers. The professor gets the death penalty for the murders exactly what the detective had planned. As for molly, she went insane at the end thinking she was the killer but she isn't.

When something really bad happens to you twice it will make most people go insane. That's the answer and to clear all the dumb theories I've read on here. Remember you have to be observant when it comes to movies like this otherwise people think it's stupid because it's beyond their understanding.

People who want everything layed out on the table in a movie obviously don't read books which require thinking and an imagination.

reply

Cheers dude, that cleared it up a treat, i didnt know what the hell happened at the end. Your are far more observant than me.

reply

Thanks heaps had no idea what was going on til i read that. Makes perfect sense!

reply

I thought it was pretty obvious Molly (or rather her split persona) did it and gets away with it, as the cop gets Kane convicted and executed.

But you're right, there is a possibility that the last shots (including her I'm-saucy-Jack lines) where purely in her own mind. Being in that kind of situation twice would indeed make most people go nuts.

That makes the detective one sick copper, though...

I am not a complete idiot. Some parts are missing.

reply

I don't think we're supposed to know who the killer is in the end... the movie is based on jack the ripper and still no one knows for sure who he is so in this movie we don't know who the killer is because it's supposed to be like the real ripper cases. anyways thats my theory.

reply

Hi this is a great theory. Although I watch alot of thriller/horror and constantly read them I was a bit confused, especially with her flashbacks. But the sequel is out and focuses on a girl who's an insane serial killer...So maybe it was her....

reply

So she wasn't even a decendent of Jack the Ripper? I thought the cop was protecting her in a creepy way. Ur positive its not her? I'll have to rent it again.

reply

[deleted]

I like the opinion that it was left open ended because the original case of Jack the Ripper was never solved as well. I noticed the one gloved police man right away, which is why I almost have to write him off as too obvious. A lot of the possible suspects are really, though. I even had Molly pegged as a possibility.

The professor I also had pegged, especially since in the beginning of the movie they kept focusing on his hands and yet never actually showed the palm or a definitive shot of the back of his hand (that I noticed) until he put the rubber gloves on.

While I agree the cop is a possibility, I can't say that I agree that he is the definitive killer.

reply

so why does it show that she kills the guy?
and what happens to the detective?
im still lost.

reply

Actually if you watch the sequel, it explains that Molly was the killer, and she was a decendant of Jack the Ripper.

reply


what is it the sequel called?




{PrettyGirlsMakeGraves}

reply

Ripper 2.

Duh.

So dive right in, let the wires get wet, everyone wants little SPARK

reply

Full title: 'Ripper 2: Letter From Within'.

reply

"Actually if you watch the sequel, it explains that Molly was the killer, and she was a decendant of Jack the Ripper."

The sequel was not written by the same screenwriter, so that might not have been the original intention at all.

reply