First, it would have been nice to start this discussion with something that is relevant to the actual film, not just an opinion on the case itself. I hesitate on taking the bait, so here goes...
Hrm, don't think so-the facts just don't add up to that conclusion. You obviously must be referring to the ABC special. In addition, the evidence is OVERWHELMINGLY in favor of this being an actual hate crime. At the bar, they were COMPLETELY SOBER when they walked in, and had a pitcher of beer to themselves. The confession tapes clearly don't indicate any inclination that they believed him to be a drug dealer. Their defense team used the "Gay Panic Defense". I could go on and on.
I say present your evidence that this was the sole reason (or was even considered)for this. I assure you, I can counter that. Rewrite history? Try again, it won't work here.
reply
share