MovieChat Forums > Conspiracy (2001) Discussion > Significance of the conversation in the ...

Significance of the conversation in the bathroom


When the guy felt sick he started talking about his father and his smoking habits? This seemed misplaced for some reason. Is there any significance to that scene?

reply

I thought it was a good scene. In my viewing of it, the scene shows that they are still men, with a conscience, but they overcome by fear of their own demise or death if they opposed the party. The "sickness" was a physical manifestation of fear. I have heard some people argue smoking reduces their stress, I suppose that smoking did not work to calm their unease.

Div
Blasted posting quota.

reply

My interpretation of the scene is different. The guy wasn't sick from the smoking. He was using that as an excuse to cover up his reaction to gassing of the Jews. Remember this was immediately after the Jews go in red, come out pink joke.

reply

Not to mention the guy was smoking cigars the whole meeting.

reply

he was given the cigar by one of other guys and told him "that was a bad cigar" and the guy replied "it was a good cigar." I agree it was an excuse.

reply

thats what i thought
as he left after the joke..i thought he couldnt take it.
but there are many different reasons for this being put in.

reply

I think it was to demonstrate the extent to which the participants were not psychopaths -- a la Charles Manson -- but normal people, health maladies and all, who thus cannot escape their guilt by arguing insanity. Look at the setting and the surrounding activity in this movie. The participants show up, eat and drink fine wine and food, enjoy the opulent surroundings, chitchat about some peripheral matters, and very calmly sit around a table and discuss a plan to murder millions of men, women and children. As Heydrich himself says at one point, "let us pretend we are the directors of I.G. Farben, that's how they do it, is it not?" (ignoring the irony that I.G. Farben produced Zyklon B gas). Others have pointed out that the participants could just as easily have been a corporate board of directors discussing how to build more widgets, given the attitude they took towards the subject under discussion.

To say nothing of the fact that Lt. Gen. Hoffman, the one who comes down with the stomach upset, was a member of the SS and thus likely no stranger to atrocities and murder... not sure that would have turned his stomach at this stage.

reply

I thought that was the point also -- he was overcome by the macabre idea of the pink bodies (at least for a moment), and then Major Lange (in the bathroom) suggests that it "must have been the cigar sir." They both know the real reason, Lange has already mentioned that the SS men suffer psychological turmoil from shooting helpless Jewish women and children rounded up for slaughter, but it is part of the Nazi military culture to avoid ANY appearance of "weakness" or empathy towards those to be slaughtered. So Schongarth can't "crack," ever, in other words.

I think the cigar cover story and the mention of the abusive cigar-smoking father when Eichmann "checked" on them (his way of bullying to get the meeting back on track as scheduled) was another way of deflecting attention to the cigar rather than the truth. In another way this comes up again at the end with Eichmann when Muller and Heydrich are sitting by the fire. Eichmann says that he had a "physical symptom" when he once fainted instead of admitting that he was disturbed by the violence he was witnessing (there is a true story that Himmler vomited and became seriously ill when he witnessed a mass shooting that had been organized for him to watch. He was apparently splashed with blood and brain matter from one of the poor victims, and he became very ill in response. This is supposedly when he decided that gas or other less "direct" means would "better" than shootings).

"On Pet Rescue today, the clever stoat keeps everyone on their toes in Somerset!"

reply

The guy was clearly sickened by the image of bodies "going in red and coming out pink." In the bathroom, he seized upon the cigar smoke as an excuse for his nausea. But as he begins to regain his composition, he quickly puts the horror of gassing men, women, and children out of his mind and relates the anecdote about his father. In a way the scene portays him as more human (he had a father and a mother like anyone else) and less human (he quickly forgets about genocide: the topic at hand).

reply

I am not sure that an ability to forget about an unpleasant topic makes him appear less human.

Pretty much the reverse, really.

reply

It's an act of sublimation:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sublimation_%28psychology%29

"In psychology, sublimation is a mature type of defense mechanism where socially unacceptable impulses or idealizations are consciously transformed into socially acceptable actions or behavior, possibly resulting in a long-term conversion of the initial impulse."

He transforms his feelings of fear and disgust into a physical reaction that he associates with something completely different. It's not just showing him as more humane, but also to show how these people dealt with these kind of issues. And how they tried to suppress their feelings and transform them into something different and unrelated. It's a coping mechanism, and this is how they dealt with it.

reply

Wow, very insightful. That adds a whole new dimension to this character for me.

reply

I think, as others have suggested, he's just trying to cover up his discomfort with the actions they're proposing. It's interesting to note that Nazi scientists did some of the first important work on the negative health consequences of smoking and the Nazi regime was the first government to engage in a public health campaign to try and curb smoking. Hitler was himself a former smoker but had given it up, and considered it decadent and unhealthy.

Unless Alpert's covered in bacon grease, I don't think Hugo can track anything.

reply

A lot has been said about the physical reaction of learning that gas was to be used to wholesale process the death of millions of Jews. And about the cigar as a cover for being sick.

While I agree with this for the most part I think there is another element that has not been touched on--

Hoffman was sick to his stomach over learning what was to be done. He is not only angry at himself for the reaction, but also perhaps about the sheer casualness with which Heydrich has introduced the topic and the way he was moving the meeting towards this action-- in short, realizing the meeting was little more than a formality to solidify plans & decisions that had already been made. He might also have been angry at others in the group for their casual acceptance of such horrors-- making jokes, etc.

So in the bathroom you have Lange and Hoffman. In walks Eichmann, Heydrich's mini hatchet man. He asks in a prefunctional way if Hoffman is ok. Lange says it might have been the cigar.

At this point Hoffman, still angry, picks up on this excuse. He starts going on about his father and cigars, recalling him sitting there with juice and pulp in his teeth, etc. and then Lange stops him-- "I would leave it there, Sir..." he says, cutting Hoffman off.

Why?

Well, because Lange thought that Hoffman was about to turn his anger towards Heydrich--Hoffman's rant about his father could have easily segued in to an attack on Heydrich or the overall plan-- perhaps even Hitler himself. With Eichmann there, checking up on him, that could have been a fatal mistake. So when Hoffman is describing his father, he's really talking about Heydrich (and perhaps Hitler) in a metaphorical way that could shortly be transformed in to a real, (verbal) direct attack.

Which is why Lange stops him and says what he says.

My take anyway.

AE36

reply

I agree with those who think he was stressed about the subject of the meeting, but it was sublimated into discussion of his cigar and some father issues. Given that this was the Third Reich, blaming his moment of nausea on a cigar was prudent.

"Chicken soup - with a *beep* straw."

reply

Also, during the discussion Hofmann puts his own office forward to carry out some bureaucratic manoeuvre and Heydrich shoots Hofmann's proposal down, putting him in his place. If he has any misgivings about what they are doing he is not going to express it openly. The actor plays Hofmann with a certain amount of bonhomie, he is not one of those whose performance oozes malice in this. But he isn't going to go up against higher authority.

"Chicken soup - with a *beep* straw."

reply