Without Gwyneth they oughtn't have bothered
No Gwyneth no start. This film will do well in those bohemian little leftist cinemas where the smell of ganja lingers in the cheap-seats. Without Gwyneth no-one else will give a toss.
shareNo Gwyneth no start. This film will do well in those bohemian little leftist cinemas where the smell of ganja lingers in the cheap-seats. Without Gwyneth no-one else will give a toss.
share
You are unbelievably stupid.
although an audaciously asinine post, this film would've benefitted if it had more star power attached to it before production -- it probably would've garnered a bigger budget and maybe even a theatrical release. john malkovich -- love him or hate him -- and ray winstone -- probably best known these days for "beowolf" or "the departed" alternatively -- do not have enough star power to draw the attention of the average movie goer. i'd have like to see someone capture the off-shoulder aristocratically european sophistication of heloise as well as gwyneth paltrow captured that wound-up patrician american snobbery in the first film. kristen scott thomas rushes to mind. or someone in the julie delpy to naomi watts strata if they wanted to skew heloise younger....
share"No Gwyneth no start."
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha - that's classic. okay if that becomes my catchphrase?
You're a tool.
She was a part in a movie that was all about a character from other source material; that main character and the original source material are what any Ripley film is about, not some actress you like.
Plot Hole - the most overused and least understood phrase at IMDb