It sucks!
Thank god it was on HBO. Had I paid to see this dog, I would have demanded my money back.
shareThis movie was good! How can you say it's bad?
Mail, motha*fucka!
MovieChat Forums > Strange Hearts (2002) Discussion > It sucks!
It's good because Robert Forster is an A actor always cast in B movies, and this is no exception. It's good because it has an interesting plot. But the predictability is awful in places... (Not that I mind the ending, in real life it should've happened this way, just sans all the melodrama.) The script could've used some finesse...and, sorry to her fans, but, in most scenes Rose McGowan is a bad actress...and a horrible dancer.
shareThis movie was a piece of *beep* *beep* I agree, "thank god it was on HBO!" Couldn't stand this piece of garbage. Rose McGowan is a horrid actress and the writing was bloody awful. I was so depressed to see Kip Pardue's poor acting because he's Victor Ward in the upcomming Bret Easton Ellis adaption, <i>Glamourama</i>. This movie was a big stinky waste of time.
shareI found it nice and fun. I think you all were expecting something a lot more serious or took some scenes to be more melodramatic than they actually were, but I just thought it was entartaining. And the songs were great!
Dandy Warhols usually suck, 'Sleep' is incredible.
Problem is, I don't know the name of the other song at the beginning "Roads to Riches".
If I were a drink I'd be a margarita, since I'm tall, salty& I always have tequila in me-Chip Esten
alisialhanson, looking forward to the filmic version of that monumental piece of crap that is Bret Easton Ellis' 'Glamourama' says all we need to know about your credibility as to what is, or what is not "a big stinky waste of time".
shareNo it doesn't. So there. My argument is just as cogent as yours.
share