A worst Horror movie i have seen ever
I deeply wonder how are they asking a question that why has'nt been this movie was not listed in top 250
Ofcourse it should'nt be even in top 1000
Please dont watch this crap
Absolute waste
I deeply wonder how are they asking a question that why has'nt been this movie was not listed in top 250
Ofcourse it should'nt be even in top 1000
Please dont watch this crap
Absolute waste
I enjoy it, and I generally like to make up my own mind on such things, but thanks for sharing your opinion.
shareYeah well its upto u... There were two jumpy scares when the tentacle girl was introduced and there was a gud humor when paul tried to run the engine but he accidently ignited the horn...
i dont find anything else interesting... pufffff .... 2/10
If this is the worst horror movie you've ever seen, you must have a very limited exposure to horror movies.
Prof. Farnsworth: Oh. A lesson in not changing history from Mr. I'm-My-Own-Grandpa!
ur wrong king of bob...
i have a very gud exposure to many horror movies these days and i find this movie and the thirst was ever worst...
movies like dark floors grudge ring uninvited were the real best as far as i had watched...
nothin else
You need to expose yourself to some ACTUALLY good horror movies. Go watch The Thing, or Susperia. You're living in a world where horror before 1998 didn't exist evidently.
There are better movies out there than Dagon, but there are certainly much worse. Try watching Blood Sucking Freaks sometime. And there are definitely better movies than The Ring and The Grudge.
Prof. Farnsworth: Oh. A lesson in not changing history from Mr. I'm-My-Own-Grandpa!
you are right king...
am not much exposed to horrors before 2000
the only horror movie i had seen before is Evil dead when i was a kid...
there are better movies than grudge and ring? nice to hear that... can u name them? Of course supernatural horror movies from 2000
Wow, I am embarrassed for you, no offense but there are profoundly superior movies to The Grudge, and The Ring, though I do love The Ring.
Here are some horror films I can recommend highly.
A Nightmare on Elm Street
A Tale of Two Sisters
Audition
Beast from 20,000 Fathoms, The
Beyond the Darkness
Bram Stoker's Dracula
Bubba Ho-Tep
Candyman
Changeling
Comedy of Terror
Dark Water (Original)
Delicatessen
Dracula A.D. 1972
Entity, The
Evil Dead, The
Exorcist, The
Fido
Fly, The
Horror of Dracula
Killer Klowns from Outer Space
Let the Right One In
Mister Frost
Night of the Living Dead
Nosferatu
Pan's Labyrinth
Peeping Tom
Phantasm
Poltergiest
Psycho
Re-Cycle
Scanners
The Shining
Shutter (Original)
Sixth Sense, The
The list goes on and on and on and on
for great horror made before 2000
-----
www.kittysafe.net
Online Mews, Reviews, Poetry, Music, and Ideas
Thanks for the info and those movie list kupotek
Dark water, 6th sense, the shining, Shutter, Psycho were the best as far as i had seen according to your list...
A tale of two sisters was not that good when compared to The Uninvited
The story was collapsed in tale of two sisters... I didnt like audition that much as i had mentioned in different posts... Dagon, Audition, and The thirst comes in the same list... the worst movies for me...
anyway thanks for sharing your time to give me that long list... had you find any other best movies after 2000... cause i dont like to watch it before 2000 period..
Great horror movies after 2000
28 Days Later
American Psycho
A Tale Of Two Sisters
Battle Royale
Behind The Mask
The Cottage
Dagon
The Descent
The Eye (original)
Final Destination
Frailty
Ginger Snaps
High Tension
Let the Right One In
Poultrygeist: Night of the Chicken Dead
[REC]
The Ring
Session 9
Shaun of the Dead
The Signal
Suicide Club
Visitor Q
A Tale of Two Sisters is a far more complexly directed and scripted story than Uninvited. Uninvited is to me, one of the worst horror films I've ever seen. Very cliche, very mediocre, I hated that film.
A Tale of Two Sisters is a profoundly stirring story about how the mind deals with trauma. In this case the death of a sister, and one's own arrogance. The music is amazing. And a lot of the story is actually shown from the view of the disturbed mind so what you see is not really what is happening.
I can see how this could be confusing to some.
-----
www.kittysafe.net
Online Mews, Reviews, Poetry, Music, and Ideas
kupotek thanks for the list dude...
i had seen all the films in your list except ginger snaps and high tension...
heard frailty is bit boring... is that so? imdb rating is also low for that movie...
While seeing on script basis i accept your thought about A tale of two sisters...
But while coming into screenplay uninvited is best than that according to me...
the movie was totally confusing... if u had watched it carefully u can see that the step mom will be talking to the girl who is dead(before they reveal that she is dead)... wat a crap was that?
I don't remember that part, I'll have to rewatch it, it's been awhile.
Frailty is an excellent movie, especially for being Bill Paxton's directorial debut. I thought it was fantastic and the ending is sweet.
-----
www.kittysafe.net
Online Mews, Reviews, Poetry, Music, and Ideas
yup kupotek.. better watch that stuff once more...
ok lemme download frailty then and i ll give my comments on that movie section page...
thx for the info
Aaaah A tale of two sisters scared the hibbyjibbies out of me ... i have two sisters :O
Showed it to them and they couldnt keep watching
_____________________
Any last words ?
Shut the *beep* up
-Mutant Chronicles-
....calling Visitor Q a horror film is pretty far fetched.
" Look, there's two women fuc*ing a polar bear "
"Bubba Ho Tep" As much as it has Bruce Campbell, its about old man Elvis defeating a mummy :P
"Nobody is free, even the birds are chained to the sky" - Bob Dylan
Decent list but some of those movies are dark comedies and not horror. The ones you listed include:
Bubba Ho-Tep
Delicatessen
Fido
Killer Klowns from Outer Space
And Pan's Labyrinth a horror movie? I don't think so.
My vote history link:http://imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=5504773
I suppose I did take some liberties, but felt they were worth recommending.
My Music: www.kittysafe.net
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Coffeespacer
I wasn't a big fan of Bubba Ho-Tep. I liked My Name is Bruce a lot better.
shareGreat horror film list you have here! Chills!
Thanks!
www.jmberman.com
Online Mews, Reviews, Poetry, Music, and Ideas
The Thing, which came out in 1982. Though it's an alien entity rather than supernatural. The Wolfman. Night Watch. Fallen. The Host. Some of them are pre-2000, but you shouldn't restrict yourself to movies made after a certain date.
Prof. Farnsworth: Oh. A lesson in not changing history from Mr. I'm-My-Own-Grandpa!
king of bob, i dont restrict them... i am a visual effects artist and i expect those kind of qualities and screening which is way different before 2000...
thats why i dont watch them much..
If you're a visual effects artist, then one would think you would be more interested in learning about visual effects before you could do everything with a few clicks on a computer. When visual effects actually took effort.
Prof. Farnsworth: Oh. A lesson in not changing history from Mr. I'm-My-Own-Grandpa!
"A few clicks on the computer"?!
You know that I know that that's a little unfair.
Thousands of man-hours perhaps. The the old-school effects on The Thing were great, and the interview with the FX guy on the DVD is really funny and interesting BTW.
My point was just that refusing to acknowledge that visual effects used to take a lot more effort. And that the above posters suggestion that movies pre-2000 aren't worth watching because visual effects sucked before the advent of computer effects is ridiculous.
Prof. Farnsworth: Oh. A lesson in not changing history from Mr. I'm-My-Own-Grandpa!
The old FX might have taken great physical achievements, and intricate sets, and lots of guys with wires. But I wouldn't say it was harder.
Just because a team is seen using a computer, doesn't make the whole thing easy.
But some effects were dreadful, and that's no different from now.
Forest Gump from 1994 uses CGI in an amazing way, but I bet they charged a lot of money for it, and were given a decent time to do it in.
Maybe you thought it was just a bunch of kids mucking about with a mouse.
The old FX might have taken great physical achievements, and intricate sets, and lots of guys with wires. But I wouldn't say it was harder.
'Harder' and 'more effort' say the same thing. I'm sorry if I got confused there!
I'm just say you don't seem to acknowledge the all hard work using these damned computers involves - especially getting it right.
But that's a common theme in the industry.
'Harder' and 'more effort' say the same thing. I'm sorry if I got confused there!
I'm just say you don't seem to acknowledge the all hard work using these damned computers involves - especially getting it right.
But it's not one guy in a room though, is it.
Depending on the type film of course, but you could need:
* Modellers, as things still have to be built, just inside the computer instead.
* Skilled animators.
* Possibly some digitising rooms to scan people and objects into the computer.
* Motion capture warehouses with animation cleanup people.
* Texturing teams, and lighting.
* Pixel shader programmers.
* The need to be on set with reflection and ambient lighting globes to capture local illumination models - something that this film could have done with, as colour and lighting matches are really important for realism.
* Render farms, needing technical staff.
* Post production teams, to matte the graphics to the film. And do all the overlays and filtering.
* Comunication and co-ordination between all the different units and general project management.
* Ridiculously short deadlines to achieve all this, because some director somewhere thinks it's all easy to do.
It is extraordinary how many teams of people are involved these days.
Having said all that, there does appear to be far too many people on the credits of films these days. It's a wonder they ever get anything done at all!
:)
People who don't bother a lot beyond basic applications think programming and graphic designing is easy.
share[deleted]
Oh, I can provide a list:
Cat People (1942)
The Uninvited (1944)
Bride Of Frankenstein (1935)
The Changeling (1980)
The Shining (1980)
Nightmare On Elm Street (1984)
Psycho (1960)
The Birds (1963)
In The Mouth Of Madness (1995)
Prince Of Darkness (1987)
The Burning (1981)
Friday The 13th (1980)
The Fog (1980)
Halloween (1978)
Rosemary's Baby (1968)
Tremors (1990)
I'm sure you can find other good horror films before 2000.
"America isn't ready for a gay, mexican chicken sandwich" - Poultrygeist
I love Susperia!
shareI wouldn't even consider the movies you just listed as horror movies they're so lame. I could name off 2000 movies under the horror category (such as gore and exploitation films....there's real horror for you....) But considering your list, I'm guessing you're rather young and the movies I would recommend would probably make you vomit and cry.
shareWhile I don't think this film deserves to be in the top 250, I thought it was pretty good.
The main character had a little warmth and humour, which is difficult to do in a film such as this, and although the film has little correlation to HP Lovecraft's story, the film, to me, at least captured much of the spirit and atmosphere.
I've certainly seen much worse than this.
[deleted]
I agree this movie is horrible. I had to go back and watch the trailer and make sure it was the same movie after watching the reviews. Maybe it's because I don't have a particular fear of fish people with plastic spears and unrealistic-looking everythings.
Take a look at that cover. If you think that is a scary/believable-looking monster type creature, you will probably enjoy this movie. When I look, I see a guy with oil-based face paint and poor theatrical orthodontics. I believe his eyes were retouched after the picture, there were no contacts or anything. furthermore, he looks like a person that has been forced to hold his mouth open for a long time(like at the dentist) his eyes are not expressing anything, (anger, sadness, happiness) it looks like he might be yawning or letting everyone within ear shot know there is a train coming. Unfortunately, You CAN judge this one by it's cover.
For me- Story was hard to swallow, the FX were horrible, the cinematography was horrible. I kept thinking, 'did they stumble upon a Spanish village or the year 1978?' because it looked like the latter. I felt like it was the scene in clash of the titans (old one) where the Kraken comes. Not believable and worse, it was BORING, worst part of the entire movie(he looked like the creature from the black lagoon, and he's not scary, even when he's 100 ft tall) and here, in case someone likes to bored and have their intelligence questioned all at once, is Dagon, a full-length rendition of what it's like to watch a whole town go nuts for a fishy guy no one has ever heard of. As the man's nightmare in the movie was a prelude to his Dagonian horror, this movie was indeed a prelude to Justin Beiber.
I was almost as happy to see this one end as I was to see Vanilla Sky. I still regret watching that (and this) movie.
You regret watching Vanilla Sky?
share" A worst horror movie I have seen ever"
I rest my case.
[deleted]
[deleted]