MovieChat Forums > Basic (2003) Discussion > Ok here is an answer there are no plot h...

Ok here is an answer there are no plot holes


Ok Here we gi ill explain everything.

1. first off the problem with styles not knowing the tags were swapped is this. he probably does not know everyone person on the base since he is the base commander. Also, any problems with filed would have been cleared up with the section 8 team b4 they arrived.

2. ok next problem is all changing of the stories. we will never know the real events in the jungle. they set up a scenario where they could take out the drug dealers. also levi said tha he really knew who hardy was. i think jardy was in the jungle and at the end of it before he is about to die he finally realizes weho hardy was.

3. now the problem with styles and hardy. styles doesnt realize it but hardy never left the army he is actually a colonel. now they set up the story of hardy's briibary charge to allow styles to think he could be bought. Also they set up the styles thing whne he says that he meant him in a parking lot a few days ago. well that was not a chance encounter.

4. ok everyone group of guys needs an adviser. that adviser was the officer wsho came for the prisoner and later allowed him to leave. he is in charge of section 8.

anymore questions just post them in a reply and i will answer.

reply

Kendall is Styles's henchman, right? He is not section 8.

Why does Hardy, (White) Pike, and Kendall talk as if they are conspiring together? You know, the "tell the story right" that sets Osborn on Hardy's tail in the end?

Why does Hardy and Pike "get their story straight," which Osborne figures out in the middle of the movie, and which exposes the first round of lies?

I can sort of understand that Kendall writes and eight in blood in the end, as he in his dying moment completely changes his mind and decides to tell the truth about the "rouge" unit that he thinks came after them (not credible, but not exactly a self-contradiction either), but why on earth does Pike write an eight when he asks to see a ranger? Why is he giving away his own cover?

In short, why does it appear that Kendall and Pike are conspiring together? They so totally are not!

No, this isn't exactly The Sting.

reply

the three stories we heard were just made up. we will never kbow wat really happened in the jungle just that the drug dealers were all killed and section 8 did their job to remove the drug problem. kendall only appears to be working with pike because he hasnt totally gotten his mind around wat really happened to he tried to make up a story where he could get off and pike went along with this because he knew wat really happened.

reply

And that would be the reason why Pike didn't talk the first or second time Hardy interrogated him. He wanted to play off Hardy to find out basically what Kendall had said.

"I haff to see vere I am going or I vill end up in a vall..."

reply

I don't think he was just making up a story. he was tellign the story he was fed by section 8 in the cabin in the jungle. he assumed it would be close to Dunbar's story, while incriminating Dunbar (Pike) without telling about the drugs. In the jungle, much of what he says would have been the truth, he assumes they'll eventually find real dead bodies to match against the story. dunbar is able to lie freely, knowing he'll never be on trial, bodies will never be found, and none of it matters to what's really happening.

reply

I just got around to seeing this movie, and thoroughly enjoyed it. Pike/Dunbar wrote the 8 on his note asking to speak to a fellow Ranger, in order to encourage Styles to call in help. Hardy fits the bill on a number of fronts, he "was" a Ranger, and he's being investigated for bribery, which Styles (as stated in the end of the film) plans to use to his own ends, if things blow up. The earlier meeting between Hardy and Styles was staged, to bring Hardy to mind, and to give Styles the info on the bribery investigation.

reply

What I was thinking is that.. ok it's called "Section 8" which is basically a secret force of 8 people (I believe they said it consisted of eight.. not sure..). At the end there was Travolta, Castro, the girl, Dunbar, Pike, and West (Jackson).. so they'd be short two people.. Alright.. it's clear that Dunbar/Pike (white one) was in Section 8.. MAYBE Kendall was as well.. if you'll notice.. BOTH of them gave misleading stories and BOTH wrote the 8 and did you notice how Travolta totally flipped when Kendall started puking up blood from being poisoned by Styles?... Ok.. so maybe they were partly doing a drug bust (cocaine and maybe the injections?) and searching for an eighth (not knowing that they'd need another due to Kendall's death)... Anyway.. this is just rambling.. BUT.. think about that!

reply

[deleted]

actually, that's exactly how it was described in the movie - people who were mentally unfit for service; i can't quite remember at which point, but Osborne explained it, i think.

it wasn't stated anywhere that the pseudo-Section-8 consists of 8 people

if you'll excuse me, i'll go back to try making sense of the movie (although my head hurts xD )

reply

[deleted]

If you truly believe there are no plot holes in Basic, then perhaps it's time for you to start thinking about other leisure pastimes.

reply

What was the business on the runway - with the propellor - all about?
Who was Travolta trying to impress and why?
He already knew that Dunbar wasn't Dunbar.
How long had this thing been planned - to get the section 8 men into West's squad, the DEA bribery scandal - all part of a set up to get Styles?
There must have been easier ways.
Just confused the hell out of me.

The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.

reply

They didn't have to "GET" them into West's squad, West was part of Section 8 to begin with. And the propeller thing was a show put on for Osbourne's sake so she would think Hardy was trying to get more answers from "Dunbar/Pike".
Yes it was all to get Styles AND Kendall AND the Doctor who was supplying the cocktails. The job of Section 8 is to neutralize the drug threat by nullifying all participants in the drug syndacate in one way or another. the doctor was arrested, Kendall was poisoned by Styles and Styles was shot by Osbourne.
And it was all planned well in advance, probably months, these are professionals. Everything you saw was like a chess game, everything that was done was to put the big "Checkmate" on Styles. eriously, years of cut and dry, liniar plots have mind numbed you people into zombies expected to be force fed the plot and not have to think. If you DO NOT think about what you see in this movie you WILL NOT get it, and you will end up like the other hopeless morons in flamersville ranting that the movie sucks because your IQ of 2 can't figure it out.

reply

not only was hardy's show to make osbourne believe, but it could also be to cover all his bases. so then he could fish out any other conspirees and possible recruit more for section 8.

just my thoughts. i enjoyed the movie. any film that keeps me trying to solve it like a puzzle after it's over is one that i enjoy.

reply

Althought it pains me to do so as every time I read these forums I am reminded that some people just need a hobby, I feel the need to post my thoughts/theories about this movie.

1. When addressed as Colonel at the end of the film, Osbourne subsequently ingquiring, "Colonel?", this leaves one of 2 possibilities. A: Hardy was actually ejected from the Army, formed section 8, and thus is addressed as Colonel as he is the leader. B: Section 8 is actually a sanctioned, "under the radar" faction of the Army and Hardy was never discharged and his DEA cover story is a way for him to operate on the radar getting intel for Section 8 missions.

I'm inclined to believe option B. This gives the Army a way of sniffing out wrongdoers without using conventional tactics, thus avoiding conventional loopholes. That and it's emminently easier to just kill someone and leave no explanation than to go through a court marshall or any other long, drawn-out process. It also would explain Hardy being a Colonel, as he was a lower rank one when he was "kicked out".

2. Lyles didn't poison Kendall. Hardy did. I'm sure most people are wondering why I'd think that, and I'm more than happy to explain. First point, Hardy obviously knew Kendall was poisoned. Even though it seems as if the blame for that lies clearly on Lyles with the comments made by him and the following exchange, I think it's possible that he actually WAS guessing. But, knowing where the conversation was going and what Hardy had planned, he went for his sidearm. Now not only is he dead. but the blame for the drug scandal falls squarely upon Lyles, not to mention Kendall and any threat he poses being eliminated. He wasn't threatened by a possible murder charge. He was threatened by the fact that everyone knew about the drugs and he knew Hardy had a strong inkling that he was the partner. In case anyone's still wondering why I think this, here's some food for thought. As far as I remember (and I just now watched the movie for the second time in 4 days), Kendall gave up nothing on the drug shipping. All he told of was the "combat cocktails". A somewhat less major offense which he pinned on Mueller. What reason would Lyles have to get rid of him? He ordered him to kill West, and he fully intended on doing it, plus he needs a loyal helper with his drug business. But, this leaves a bigger question. Why did he write the 8 on Osbourne's hand? Was he afraid that Section 8 would break in on their action? Or, had he indeed become remorseful for his deeds and know that the members Section 8 would have the ability to "clear" the matter up? If that is the case, all of #2 is defunkt.

3. My theory on what really happened in the jungle. Aside from Mueller and Kendall, all the rest of the unit also knew about the shipments and a subsequent plan of West and Hardy's to get rid of Mueller and Kendall. The part about West finding out was for real and he obviously did indeed inform Lyles. I think the part in the bunker where West showed up after his apparent death was one of the few moments of truth. This explains 1: why the discharge of a grenade was necessary to draw attention to his "dead" body (if that event even did indeed happen) and 2: why he actually walked out of the bunker alive. His apparent death was meant to scare Kendall and Mueller. Also, notice that Mueller was the one with the knife to his neck. So what was he going to do? And seeing as how Mueller was his partner in crime, Kendall wasn't about to shoot through him to get to West.

4. Now, as to how Kendall actually got shot I have a theory on that was well. Since the first scenario involves something that could actually be viable (the real Pike going to shoot Mueller) and the second something that obviously never happened (the real Dunbar getting shot) I'd tend to think scenario number one is the actual explanation. But, this also brings up the question, "Why didn't they just shoot them both and leave them there?" Well, if he didn't bring Kendall back, there was no chance of getting the information about the drug shipments, the "combat cocktails", or anything else to the right people.

Obviously something happened in that bunker. I believe that (the real) Pike's stories are closer to the truth, but none of what we're shown in the jungle is entirely truthful.

Anyway, that's my two cents.

reply

Gosh- this movie is such a hidden gem- NOBODY saw it in theaters (except for me :D). Yet, it's truly one of those movies that can keep you thinking time and time again about how it all works out. It gives you some tools for extrapolation (Styles talking about how Hardy had "randomly" run into him, for example) and lets you try to puzzle out the rest. Not to mention that the plot twists so many times that no "twist afficionado" would be dissapointed. And Travolta and Jackson are always fun to watch. I don't understand people who claim that A) the movie is full of holes and B)sucks.

reply

I am so confused about the ending in this movie. I havn't seen it for about 3 monthes and that may be the reason. Can someone explain... the whole training operation was set up by the guys you see at the end? Sorry for my ignorance but i'm intrested to find out cuz its killin me!

reply

Yes, the training op was a set up.

reply

No there's no plot holes in this movie, and the WWE is completely real. The writer and director put things in the movie to intentionally trick the viewer. This movie wasn't true to itself because if it were, we'd have been able to figure out the ending. Such a film as the sixth sense had no plot holes because the director didnt intentionally add useless scenes to eliminate the chance of guessing the end. The gay guy weirdo writing the 8 in blood, travolta, pike and the airplane blade, travolta acting surprised when osbourne finds things out, were all added to trick the viewer. That's fine if you think this movie is great, but to say a movie that was purposely made to deceive has no plot holes, is ignorant. If I were making a movie and didnt want anyone to be able to guess the end, I'd HAVE to put holes in the story, otherwise the movie would be predictable.

reply

If people are too stupid to figure out that each story was how the person saw it or how they made it up then they need to go kill themselves
an WWE? are you talking about wrestling? if you are I am laughing at you and thinking that only stupid rednecks who have failed the fifth grade 6 times watch that crap
and if its not wrestling I am sorry

Cigarettes killed my father.... and raped my mother! -Family Guy (random Congress guy)

reply

First Off, recognize sarcasm. The whole point of the mission was to find out if Styles was involved. They tell you that. "You take a rattle the cage to find out who's working for who operation" There were not holes in the jungle scenes. The point was to illustrate that the jungle was not even a real factor or objective in the mission. The purpose of Kendall's character was to try and get him to turn on whoever was running the drug operation. Obviously they would have to have someone collaberated testimony in order to maintain the units cover. Towards the end of the movie, when Dunbar (Pike) asks Hardy if he got what he was looking for, Hardy replied "not even close" This is why Hardy had to get Styles to admit he was the ringleader. The whole mission was to verify that Styles was involved and hopefully get testimony against him.
This is just my opinion.

reply

Sure, it's a thought-provoking movie and lots of different - and conflicting - theories have been advanced about it here on IMDB. One point that jarred with me was senior officers meekly accepting Captain Osbourne's explanation for killing Colonel Styles and letting her wander off to the next twist in the plot. Another was nothing being done after Hardy - apparently a civilian under a cloud of suspicion - had held off soldiers with a side-arm and threatened a prisoner by forcing him up towards the propeller. In both cases I would have thought that Hardy and Osbourne would have been detained pending a formal investigation into their behaviour.

reply

yamijaurus:
"And it was all planned well in advance, probably months, these are professionals. Everything you saw was like a chess game, everything that was done was to put the big "Checkmate" on Styles. eriously, years of cut and dry, liniar plots have mind numbed you people into zombies expected to be force fed the plot and not have to think. If you DO NOT think about what you see in this movie you WILL NOT get it, and you will end up like the other hopeless morons in flamersville ranting that the movie sucks because your IQ of 2 can't figure it out.

Okay, so if these guys are such professionals, I'd like to know what they achieved by their elaborate, complex and months in advance planned rumble in the jungle.

West has gone to Styles with his information on drugs, but Styles does nothing. That would be pretty strong indication towards his involvement in drug trafficing, no? And Section 8 thinks that Styles will get West murdered in the jungle; so West takes with him to the exercise four undercover Section 8 members and two other cadets who he thinks or knows will try to kill him.

Something (which isn't clearly explained in this movie) happens in there. Pike (as Dunbar) runs alone, six hours late, to pick-up point with Mueller shooting at him - but Pike gets him. Remember, Styles sees it, so it really happens opposed to those many false flashbacks.

Making that show to Styles had to be part of Section 8's plan to "Checkmate" Styles. After all, jungle is full of them, and all has been planned ahead, so Muellers beeing there can't just be a coincidence - they have planned all this, and they know that Mueller is part of conspiracy.

Because this film has no plot-holes and is wholly coherent, Section 8 has decided that Pike needs to impersonate Dunbar, and Kendall must follow this scheme. So Hardy (who has been in the jungle and knows what happened there) and Osborne interrogate them, and are told a web of lies.

And all these complex schemes to get masterminds behind drug trafficing. Guess what? Kendall gives Vilmer easily, and would propably done the same if, for example, would have been questioned without all that complex scheming. And Styles? Section 8 does not get any evidence against him. That's right, all this boring gimmicky for nothing. Sure, he poisons Kendell, but there's no evidence. Hardy just walks to his office and says he's on to him. Styles loses it, and tries to kill him (which, by the way, would have succeeded haven't Osborne sneaked outside and seen the whole thing. Quite elaborate.) The thing is: a) Hardy could have done it without the whole thing in the jungle; maybe Styles would have lost his guts anyway and tried to bribe and/or kill him, or maybe he would keep his cool and walk out of it, OR b) even after the jungle thing Styles would have got away if he would just deny everything. And even if evidence was left of the poisoning - that was Section 8s plan? To get Styles to kill Kendell, so they could nail him for that? And again, everything in the jungle and confused identities for that?

If one want's to reason with this film, there are two choises: 1) Section 8 blew it. They somehow screwed up in the jungle, and improvised (without any sense, I might add) all the wrong identities and all that other stuff useless solving the case. 2) They put the whole show up to see if Osborne was suitable for Section 8 by solving the case-without-any-sense. Yea, she did it. And I just saw a movie which had illogical twists because it was about underground, top-secret group of drug enforcers recruiting new member.

Well, at least "Basic" made me think. And more I think about it, the more I want to forget it.

So if you saw this movie and didn't like it, maybe it was because you realized that you just 98 minutes of twists for twists sake. This was a gimmick-film; all flashy surface to confuse audience, but beneath it - no substance. IMHO.


Reality isn't what it used to be...

reply

Finally, someone making some sense ;) Thank you, that actually gave me closure.

reply

http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=27570216

Very close, but, the whole operation was supposed to be resolved in the jungle.

First of all, I watched it twice, back to back. Its a hot mess of a movie and I agree with the above, flat out lying to the viewer is *beep* and they layered too many versions on the viewer for it to be untangled, it would have been better with only one version of the jungle scene being shown but y'know; John McTiernan = Gun Fights & jungle.


The first version of it we see, is exactly what happened from Kendall's point of view, he told the truth, you just need to swap Dunbar & Pike.
The operation went wrong when Kendall woke up and intervened in the apprehension of Mueller.
The rest of the revisits to the jungle scene are the lies that were told to try to uncover the drug deals.
Once the jungle operation went south and Mueller got killed, they realised they would have to go back to the base to try to entrap Styles as noone had fessed up yet and they didn't have any evidence.

That's why there is a hasty set up and pretty loose plan to try to get the major players. It literally doesn't matter what Pike says in the first scene, which is why he won't talk. The whole point is that Kendall who is in hospital doesn't know what he said, and therefore tells the truth (as far as he knows it), giving up Vilmer.
Hardy didn't want Osborne in the room to begin with, she bullies her way in, but it didn't change anything, all the games in there were for her benefit only.

Then Hardy finds out that Vilmer & Osbourne had dated for 2 years, which means he starts quizzing her trying to find out if she was also aware or in on the operation.

Hardy is convinced Osbourne is clear after they confront Vilmer.

Hardy didn't know Kendall had been poisoned, he freaks out.


No plot holes apart from Kendall writing an '8' on Osbournes hand, did he see Hardy in the Jungle? Is section 8 common knowledge? I doubt it.
I think it's just a macguffin to get Osbourne & Hardy back on track, as is Hardy picking up on Vilmers saying that Ray Dunbar is black.

Hardy needed to rescue Dunbar from the transport, that scene was also a mess, the propeller part was Hardy telling Dunbar a new narrative to tell in order to bring the coke into the story but that whole part of the narrative was choppy, if you'll excuse a double pun.



reply

You have to understand that most twisting plot movies eventually lead to a decisive ending and that's where the story ends. In this case, the members of Section 8 are obviously a covert, government sanctioned unit that go from case to case. So there is no climatic case buster where everyone gets their pictures in the paper and a medal around their neck. Their job is to keep their identities hidden so they can move on to another undercover sting without letting their targets become suspicious. This unit probably trained together for some time, all making West look like the bad guy so the target members would bond and begin to trust the undercover members.

Pike/Dunbar was obviously responsible for adding heat to whatever Kendall says during interrogations to flush out Styles. They knew they couldn't focus fully on Kendall because Styles was afraid of his father, the General. Styles didn't want any official inquiry into the mess because it would uncover his drug operation. Hence his bringing Hardy in, believing him to be a bribe taker and ex-military. I believe Styles poisoned Kendall, but Kendall probably did not know who poisoned him, and maybe believed the infamous Section 8 got to him and tried to blame his death on them by writing the 8 on Julie's hand.

reply

I'm sure Hardy was in the jungle...watch the beginning of the movie when he gets the call and he's in the shower. The shower curtain had mud all over it. Why else would there be mud in/on his shower if he wasn't out in the jungle?

reply

So Hardy knew Osbourne was listening in on him and Styles and was counting on Styles trying to shoot him and counting on Osbourne shooting Styles, thus saving his life? That's quite a long shot, but otherwise the film is pretty tight. I guess you can't have that many plot twists without having a weak spot or two.

reply

You all missed one huge plot point in the movie. The ones involved in the drug trade found out West knew and were planning to take him out. They pulled off the big set up in the jungle not just to stop some drugs, but to save West from the dirty members at the base.

reply

Hardy (DEA officer) and Osbourne (JAG officer investigating a murder possibly involving drugs) smoking a J in the car ("I haven't done this since college")???!

reply

Easy explanation, and the most simplest...
...they're section 8.

Done.

reply