MovieChat Forums > Lovely & Amazing (2002) Discussion > Wow, Emily Mortimer has guts!

Wow, Emily Mortimer has guts!


That scene would kill anyone, surely???

reply

Emily Mortimer does have one breast bigger than the other.

"We're making a film here, not a movie."

reply

all women have one breast slightly bigger than the other

reply

The only reason Mulroney's character commented on it is because the difference isn't "slight".

"We're making a film here, not a movie."

reply

[deleted]

LOL. Anyway that was one scary scene. What I found funny is that the Dermot guy is actually married to Catherine Keener.

reply

I guess that says a lot about Neil's experience with breasts...

reply

No they don't. Mine are the same size so that's one person for a start.

reply

Maybe from above, but let me check from the front!! (Sorry, couldn't resist)

reply

My wife actually has one *smaller* than the other, so there!!

reply

LOL

--------
Daily single-tweet movie reviews: https://twitter.com/SlackerInc

reply

I think this theory needs more personal research on my part!

My only regret in life is that I'm not someone else - Woody Allen

reply

That doesn't bother me at all!

;-)

reply

Yeah, its one thing for an actress to be naked in a sex scene, but to just stand there naked for as long as she did was probably very difficult.

Melodrama coming from you is about as natural as an oral bowel movement.

reply

anyone can stand naked that long...but she was in front of a man and maybe a crew in front of a camera

Everything has a reason. Sometimes the reason is you forgetting to pack your pancakes tight enough.

reply

uhhhh -- they're called ACTORS (they hate "actress") and they get paid and have a calling to STAND IN FRONT OF AUDIENCES!! if you want courage, check out Kathy Bates wallowing naked in the mud in At Play in the Fields of the Lord, as she is a missionary's wife who goes mad in the jungle and reverts to animalism


My only regret in life is that I'm not someone else - Woody Allen

reply

And thus, we are--as an audience watching a portrayal of a character -- given a chance to see how gutsy the character is. I think Holofcener did something really tricky here. It's beautiful how she shows that there's immense strength in letting yourself be so vulnerable, in surfing the wave of emotions -- shame, pride, doubt, confidence -- to arrive at a new view of yourself.

The character was desperate to be mirrored, to be seen. The movie star man was the perfect audience -- he wasn't going to placate her or seduce her (he'd done that). He'd just look at her for what she is, even with the same critical pro actor's eye she had herself. By hearing his flatly unromantic description of her physical self, she could overcome the terrible doubt she had about who and what she was in other people's eyes. Her agent plainly wasn't seeing her, her mom loved her unconditionally, her sister was in her own world. Her boyfriend maybe saw her alright, but he felt deep down that that kind of talk was irrelevant (like the dogs), so that was a kind of dismissal of her needs to be acknowledged for who she was.

Anyway, I've never seen a scene like this in a movie. It's cool and true.

reply

Well, you may be right.

but I took it to be a scene that shows her neurotic obsession with herself, as actors need to have in order to "contantly tune the instrument" etc. While her boyfreind was a crepp, I sympathized with him.

reply

Superb read gwendefortun!

I'd only add the following:

The actor was the perfect 'disinterested third party'.

I believe the experience served to confirm Elizabeth's suspicions about herself. We can presume that on many occasions she stood before a mirror, alone, compiling a list of the same physical attributes that the actor called out.

He matter-of-factly rattle off the same list that she'd made (remember the 'flabby arms' confirmation) and was finally assured that, first-and-foremost, she isn't "crazy".

Instead of crushing her spirit, his point of view appeared to settle her perception into one of self-awareness and steered her away from "neurotic" self-obsession.

It was a great scene.

reply

I've never seen an actress just stand there naked for that long. Not in a legit movie anyways. I couldn't have done it... I'd be like "are we done yet?"

Bre
Looking for a fella to call me his little darlin'...

reply

I thought she was incredibly brave to do this scene, she shows that nobody is perfect; she really should be trimmed the bush though, that was really gross IMO

reply

Absolutely true, a very brave scene.
Because Dermot wasn't saying random things, he was just doing an exact description of her body.
I can't imagine many actresses who would do a scene like this one.

reply

"I thought she was incredibly brave to do this scene, she shows that nobody is perfect; she really should be trimmed the bush though, that was really gross IMO"

A woman in her natural state is "gross" to you? If you were a male anytime before say around 1980 I guess you would have been gay. Women for the most part didn't worry about the fact they had pubic hair then lol. Geez people nowadays can be so weird with wanting everyone to be so sterile. Do you like long hair on a head? As long as one washes it to keep it clean and fresh it's attractive right? People need to stop analyzing the crotches of others lol...everyone's a little bit different and that's fine! But I guess we're all supposed to look like little girls or porn stars now:) Ugh.

reply

I'm a male who still prefers "bush", but it was way later than 1980 that it disappeared: more like somewhere in the '90s.

--------
Daily single-tweet movie reviews: https://twitter.com/SlackerInc

reply

You guys do know that that was a um...how should I put this...hair piece. It's a way of having them naked without being NAKED, if you know what I mean.

reply

They call them merkins. But how do you know for sure? I grant it's entirely possible; but on my big-screen TV at 480p (since this is only available on DVD and not Blu-ray) I couldn't tell for sure.

I just wonder if some people assume it must be a merkin because they think a natural bush couldn't be that big or dense, whereas I assure you it can, and then some.

--------
Daily single-tweet movie reviews: https://twitter.com/SlackerInc

reply

Is not a porno

reply

[deleted]

hahaha, yes, very brave.

reply

She does; it was a really telling scene about Hollywood! I thought this movie was great as far as character studies; you really got a true sense about who they all were, which was heartbreaking in some cases.

For those who have commented, all people are slighty asymmetrical, and generally the breast on the side that is your "handed" side (left- or right-handed) is slightly bigger, just more muscle use on that side. As for those who commented "ew gross" about her pubic hair, um -- why has it become gross to have naturally occuring hair? Freakier would have been her standing there looking like a little girl, blech.

Finally, Julianne Moore also gave a long diatribe while naked from the waist down in Short Cuts (a movie I was pretty eh about), for what it's worth.

reply

Don't forget Mimi Rogers now either......Full Body Massage baby!!!

reply

That scene makes me hate myself as a man, probably because I find myself agreeing with everything he says. It's a brutal dissection.

reply

Aha, Bill Bones! You are excellent. Thanks for posting.
And yes, kprp and claretohere, the scene also was a vivid way of animating the undercurrent of Hollywood--heartless appraisement of physical beauty at every turn. We've been infected by it.

reply

Aha, Bill Bones! You are excellent. Thanks for posting.
And yes, kprp and claretohere, the scene also was a vivid way of animating the undercurrent of Hollywood--heartless appraisement of physical beauty at every turn. Seems we've been infected by it out here in regular society, haven't we?

reply

It's not that brutal. He says a lot of nice things about her too. Saying it makes you hate yourself as a man is glossing over the complexity of the interaction.

Anton Chigurh is dead and Spider-Man 3 is superior in every way to Funny Games.

reply

Not only that, he makes it very clear that he finds her very attractive, minor imperfections notwithstanding. Remember the phone call at the end? He sounds rather distressed at the prospect of not seeing her again.

_____
Strip away the phony tinsel of Hollywood and you find the real tinsel underneath.

reply

You were "eh" about Short Cuts and you think a little shave down there is "blech." Says a lot about you.

Anton Chigurh is dead and Spider-Man 3 is superior in every way to Funny Games.

reply

[deleted]

First thing I thought when I saw that scene- surely she isn't going to go up there, full bush and all. Wow, the lady has some serious guts. And what we don't see, is that there were probably multiple takes, and took a long time to shoot.

I wouldn't call it a brutal assessment though. He started off with a compliment, and said nice things as he went along. Still, that has to be incredibly hard.

reply

That's a hair piece, so to speak. They do that a lot in movies...that way the actor doesn't have to be totally naked.

reply

Heck yeah! Even with the soft lighting and ambiance coupled with a glow from the fire - it would take quite a bit of courage! Especially knowing the scene would involve a body critique! She looked lovely - good for her!

reply

I think if Emily Mortimer were an ugly person it would've been a difficult scene.. However despite her faults (which inevitably make people the most beautiful), she was unquestionably lovely. I would not call it courageous.

reply

She is just lovely and just adorable.

I don't think she was being brave for that scene, but professional - she's an actress. Yes, one of my favourite :-)

reply