MovieChat Forums > The Animal (2001) Discussion > Why don't they make a second movie?

Why don't they make a second movie?

posted 19 years ago by dreamycow123
9 replies | jump to latest

In the end the proffessor guy had a some kind of screwed up foot which I don't get it. they should make a second movie.

I think that the guy just hadn't clipped his toenails in a long time.

We were supposed to worry, though, for a few minutes, that he was the "second beast-man." (There were also hints that Lombardi's character and Ed Asner's character might be). Of course, all three were red herrings.

[–] benfoldsismydad 19 years ago

The resason that they don't make a second movie is because the first one sucked, a lot.

[–] MitchellTF 19 years ago

He got it...Did it make a profit?

[–] FosterBreadford 19 years ago

If they do make a sequal, it should be called, "The Mammal"

"Surley you can't be serious"
"I am serious and dont't call me Shirley!"

[–] Sakujo 18 years ago

I got better idea: why don't they just UNMAKE the original movie?!

[–] Akimbo_Slice 17 years ago

How do you unmake this movie? Destroy every copy of the movie? Well, they CAN'T!!! I refuse to give this movie up!

"Is the hot tea hot or cold?"
"Is the tea iced tea?"
"No, it's HOT tea!"
"Then I have no idea!"

[–] 17 years ago

[deleted]

[–] daggers-1 12 years ago

No, they should not make a second movie. Instead, they should claim to have made a second movie, use it to lure in people who like this kind of movie, and get rid of them, so we can have better movies.

http://www.MichaelZWilliamson.com

[–] 12 years ago

[deleted]