Random Battles


This might have been brought up before, but did anyone else notice how frequently random battles occurred in this game compared to the older ones? I never made it the whole way through VIII, but it definitely didn't happen that often in VII.

------
The Fog + Freddy Got Fingered = Worst movies ever made

reply

Mm, it's the opposite for me. I remember wanting to get through 7's storyline, moving from one location to the next but keep getting interrupted by those maddening battles. Perhaps it's subjective, depending on how immersed we are in the story and want to see what happens next.

"There's a difference between simply being, and knowing you are."

reply

I didnt notice any real difference

I am NOT a guy!!

reply

[deleted]

the GF cutscenes were a B*tch used to hate using them so most of the time i didnt lol.. but going back on topic i cant say i noticed it unless going through wooded areas then it was insane like every 2nd-3rd step :S

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I Will Never Be A Memory!!!

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

Right I just wanted to say something, as I have been watching your comments recently and I see you are still stalking Rapunzel_Knows_Best (Al_Ice), so I thought to myself that I would bring up a few points.

You state that he is a paedo because of remarks he makes and etc... We have heard it all before blah, blah, blah. Though lets say you were to bring these screenshots to court, the judge would laugh at you, as its the god damn internet I can say anything on here, in fact you would lose even more dignity than you have already. .

Right, so since he thinks young girls may look "cute" in a particular type of clothing does that mean that beauty pagent judges are also paedos? Because by your logic it does mean this, it also means that fashion designers for children are also paedos. .

As you state everywhere you go on your stalking spree you state you have evidence. Which of course I have seen, though this does not prove in the slightest he is a paedo, and I will explain why.

Considering he makes remarks about young girls in your eyes that makes in him a paedo? Right? Though if I was to go around saying I like to play with my blood when I cut my self and when I dissect my victims whom I murder I like to take out the liver first, does this make me a psychopath? No, because I may be either saying this because 1: I am trolling 2: I am trying to be controversial or 3: I am having a joke, so how do you really know he is a paedo? Answer: You dont.

Also as we know and like I have said you go around claiming he is a paedo... Yet.... Have you ever met him? No, have you ever seen him on the street? No and do you want to meet him? By the sounds of it no and have you ever been to his house and actually seen his apparent 20,000 images or his wall shrine? No. So how can you judge someone by a few screenshots and apparently a wall of posters (which could have easily been googled for) or a folder containing 20,000 pictures (which like I said could have easily been a game folder, considering he has games on his desktop). Also judging by the amount of screenshots you have, you are the one with an obsession.

Now like I said in our relay of PMs I said that he may have a slight obsession with children, you have a MAJOR obsession with him, you are more dangerous than him, as you in nearly every comment you make are stating he is a paedo. This my friend is called an unhealthy obsession, and something which you should be banned for, in fact I can see you being banned more than he will.

Next, in most of your remarks towards Rapunzel_Knows_Best you rarely get replies. You do know what this means... Right? No one gives a s*hit. You really need to find a hobby like collecting stamps... Oh wait you already collect screenshots and as a pass time stalk a user on the internet, my bad .

Also, considering you are everyones unfriendly neigbourhood *beep* I rather like that one), and you think that you need to keep IMDb a safe place, why hasn’t IMDb banned his IP address? I can answer that for you - IMDb does not care about your fairytales. If they truly cared they would have had him banished long ago, there is more of a case that you are dangerous than he is, by just 5 posts that you make.

Finally, on our little disagreement of the Connery boards, when I brought up the paedo claims you ran to your friend and begged for help and begged they would back your claims up, which was rather amusing, as this shows how weak you are.

I am proud to stick up for Rapunzel_Knows_Best as I have talked to him and I enjoy the short conversations he had, in fact at one stage I did not even know it was him as I was chatting to him on the RDR boards, then you came along with your idiotic opinions and ruined it. (Notice I said did not say ‘facts’ as all your claims are bogus ).

I know your going to reply to this as you believe that replying to each and every reply proves that you have a larger penis than everyone else, I dont know if I will want to reply as I have just stated my view on you and I am rather proud of it, as it is the truth, though hey maybe I should follow you around IMDb for a while and see how you like it, how about ever time you post a condescending remark about Rapunzel_Knows_Best? Though that would mean I would be sinking to just as low as you.

Just remember I am always watching you, and whenever I think Rapunzel needs help, I will be there because he has done nothing wrong.

__

Jesus, that's really super... How'd a nitwit like you get so tasteful?

reply

[deleted]

That comment has just proved my point.

__

Jesus, that's really super... How'd a nitwit like you get so tasteful?

reply

[deleted]

No problem my friend.

Kevin knows he is wrong in fact he has been proved wrong so many times now that he does not know what defeat is, like I said, I'm always around and when you need my help. What I find amusing is that he states that there are countless numbers of people who believe him yet they never help him in his battles unless he begs to them.

To Kevin being a paedo is someone who thinks a child looks cute, which in no way is true. What I have learnt from Kevin is that even if you put lipstick on a pig it's still a pig, what I am trying to say is no matter how much he over exagerates his comments they are still pointless and meaning less statements of abuse.
__

Jesus, that's really super... How'd a nitwit like you get so tasteful?

reply

[deleted]

Uh... who exactly did I beg to help me and how exactly have I been proven wrong even once about anything?


You begged to a iser called 'Shosh-tastic' and the things I proved you wrong in? Well I just stated one and well there has been many more though because you are ignorant you ignore them.

That's even worse than the pedo's familiar "Er, no, what I meant by that was um... see, uh, you took that the wrong way... " argument. Painfully transparent son, you're a laughing stock even to yourself.


Your argument is actually the transparent one as you have a large selection of screenshots of a user which you have stalked for months and cliam he is a paedo just because he typed a few things in to his computer, grow up.

... Don't even wanna know what you've been doing in your spare time.


Good, but we all know what you do in your spare time .

And yet I have evidence to corroborate them, which proves conclusively that they are not meaningless.


They are meaningless lol, like I explained aboved, like holy sh*t you must just ignore peoples comments, no wonder you apparently win all your debates, like I said they are only screenshots which prove nothing. They only prove that you are a stalker with an obsession with masturbation.

This has become one-sided much faster than our Sean Connery debate, I thought for a second that when you turned up you might've thought of something new that might help defend the paedophile and at the very least give me some sort of challenge, I do admittedly love to debate which I make no attempt to hide despite the more important motive in all this, but it's the same stuff you said to me via PM. How disappointing, what a waste.


One-sided? Is anyone here sticking up for you? No. Yet there are 2 people proving that you are a stalker who makes false claims and has an obsession with masturbation and liks to collect screenshots of people talking about kids so then you yourself can masturbate to them.
__

Jesus, that's really super... How'd a nitwit like you get so tasteful?

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

What an apt thread title.

---------------------------------------


born slippy

reply

You begged to a iser called 'Shosh-tastic' and the things I proved you wrong in? Well I just stated one and well there has been many more though because you are ignorant you ignore them.


EXCUSE ME? I stated my own beliefs and just backed up some of what Kevin had stated because he is right. I had a series of emails with the pedo for over a month and I feel like I know some about the whole situation....much more than you, obviously.

Kevin didn't ask me for anything. Get your facts straight.


Also, what you don't understand is that even Talor/Alice/Rapunzel admits that he is a pedophile. The difference is, that he says he will not ever touch a child but I think that he is leaning toward that as his mental state deteriorates. THAT is what he can't admit.


fly....be free

reply

Hahahahaha, okay whatever you say. Did little Kevin need help again because he is stil allll alone.

__

Jesus, that's really super... How'd a nitwit like you get so tasteful?

reply

I simply decided to answer you because you brought up my name. Kevin is a grown man who can fight his own battles. He doesn't need me but we are friends.

fly....be free

reply

If that is the case that you replied for only mentioning my name then fair enough. As for Kevin, well I have said all I need about him. Also thank you for being truthful that you are friends, I'm glad you are not trying to deny it.

__

Jesus, that's really super... How'd a nitwit like you get so tasteful?

reply

The difference is, that he says he will not ever touch a child but I think that he is leaning toward that as his mental state deteriorates. THAT is what he can't admit.
Less than 2% of neurotic disorders develop into psychotic ones, and said development show no statistically significant correlation with how much pressure/stress the individual is under. Why do you think his "mental state" would "deteriorate"?

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

he actually has a source
"Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behaviour", by Passer & Smith.

http://www.amazon.com/Psychology-Science-Behavior-Michael-Passer/dp/00 73382760 (I recommend the paperback edition though, I have that, it's a bit cheaper).

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

maybe you could just scan the page that says it.
That would be illegal... I never do illegal things.

Hang on a moment, I think someone's trying to get out of my basement.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

Yep, that's what I thought.
What? You're like a creationist. The data is right there, you just refuse to check it out. That book is a standard work and is available in any academic library. I'll even tell you where to look: chapter 17.

And you still didn't explain why you think his mental state would deteriorate.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

I'm supposed to go down to the library, search for that book and look at chapter 17
Yes. Thanks for asking, but it should be obvious that that's what you are supposed to do.

Maybe that's because I didn't make the statement.
Ok, well, do you think it will?

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

laugh
Sure. But the fact remains that the data is right there, in a standard work on psychology (not even psychiatry, which should be a hint about how well-known this statistic is), and you refuse to even go look at it, despite the fact that you could do so at no cost whatsoever. You are, in every way, like a creationist, without any credibility whatsoever.

Judging by how fast his obsession has already worsened in such a short space of time? It's certainly a strong possibility, yes.
Worsened? He still likes the same things and he still doesn't act on it. What do you mean?

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

More than 99% of creationists are credible people. Look, it says so here:

http://www.amazon.com/Statistics-4th-David-Freedman/dp/0393929728/ref= sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1308553710&sr=1-1

Get the point?
I happen to have that book and I can't find anything at all about creationism in it... You on the other hand simply discards direct replies to exactly what you asked about. On top of that, you accuse me of fabricating evidence... When you do the same on a regular basis.

His obsession has grown from watching a single programme about child models on television to spending endless amounts of money purchasing rare items or films purely because they have children in them, plastering child actresses all over his walls, masturbating to children, gawking at them in the street, and even stealing photos of his 11 year-old sister's school friend and going to Parents' Evening just to see her. In such a short space of time, his paedophilia has since grown to dominate his entire life, I don't even want to think about what will happen in the next 10 years or so.
I still don't see what you mean by "short" space of time since he's been doing things like that for years. So please go ahead and explain.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

Let me save you some time Shosh, the guy's a troll who makes up statistics without providing a source and then chuckles to himself when you actually acknowledge them, basically the adult equivalent of 'made you look'.


OOPS....too late, I already answered him.

fly....be free

reply

Why do you think his "mental state" would "deteriorate"?



Because in the last year, he has gone from obsessing about famous actresses on IMDb to obsessing about his 11 year-old sister's friend.

I am not claiming to know that he will slip and actually touch a girl, but as his disorder progresses the chances also increase. It is his adamant denial that this will ever happen that scares me. Why not just go and talk to someone IRL? What could it hurt? When he is asked, he says that it is because he isn't sick....yet he doesn't deny that he achieves sexual gratification from little girls.

fly....be free

reply

I am not claiming to know that he will slip and actually touch a girl, but as his disorder progresses the chances also increase. It is his adamant denial that this will ever happen that scares me. Why not just go and talk to someone IRL? What could it hurt? When he is asked, he says that it is because he isn't sick....yet he doesn't deny that he achieves sexual gratification from little girls.
I have a couple of questions for you.

1. What is the standard "progression" of this disorder?

2. Go and talk to whom? A psychiatrist? Psychologist?

3. You obviously think pedophiles are sick. Do you think homosexuals are sick?

4. Catholic nuns are sworn to celibacy. Do you consider them sick for voluntarily doing so?

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

I have a couple of answers for you:

1. I don't think there is a "standard" progression of any disorder. But the nature of a disorder implies that it does progress....either getting worse or if the person seeks help, it could get better. But rarely is it static.

2. I am not picky, just someone who is certified to help

3. I do think pedophiles are sick. Homosexuals are not. Pedophiles derive pleasure through children, while homosexuality is simply a sexual preference between two adults.

4. Oh brother...you are really reaching. What does celibacy have to do with pedophilia?

fly....be free

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

I think everyone's abnormal in some way, and abnormality isn't always a bad thing either, I'm not sure Shosh would consider that an insult even if she disagrees with it.



Well, you know that I am abnormal. No I don't consider it an insult. I actually only like strange people. Normal ones are boring.

Also, Taylor/Alice/Rapunzel should know by now, that I don't take offense to other people's opinions, even if they are different than mine.

fly....be free

reply

[deleted]

Sorry to burst your bubble, being a mother of a gay son and all, but if pedos are not normal for loving children (yes, love, true and honest love like the one you hopefully feel for your husband), then gays are not normal either.


If what you feel for children is what I feel for my husband then it is wrong. Adults feel love for each other that also encompasses sexual love, and the act of making love....if that is what you feel for children then you need help.

Don't defend behind the curtain Kevin pulled up about "pedos are in it for the age, homos are in it only for the same gender but with adults". There are enough homosexual pedophiles out there too. I'm surprised about that even. Every time some priest hits the news with another scandal, it's about messing with boys.


Homosexuals are normal. My son is normal. Is it the norm? Maybe not. But they are not sick. Homosexuals that prefer children are not. THEN they are pedophiles..


When will you understand it's about love, not dominating because they are smaller than an adult? For certain psychos maybe that can be a reason why they pick a child.
How hard can it be for you to accept that some men simply think children are beautiful and attractive? I don't ask you to cheer for that, but if you could just accept that without adding evil cruel fantasy to it ...



I believe that you believe that you will never hurt a child. I hope that you stick to that belief and that if you ever feel yourself slipping and wanting to touch a child that you then seek help.



fly....be free

reply

I have a couple of answers for you:

1. I don't think there is a "standard" progression of any disorder. But the nature of a disorder implies that it does progress....either getting worse or if the person seeks help, it could get better. But rarely is it static.

2. I am not picky, just someone who is certified to help

3. I do think pedophiles are sick. Homosexuals are not. Pedophiles derive pleasure through children, while homosexuality is simply a sexual preference between two adults.

4. Oh brother...you are really reaching. What does celibacy have to do with pedophilia?
Thank you for taking your time to reply.

There are common progressions to most actual disorders (mental disorders can progress in several ways and often follow unexpected patterns, yet said patterns definitely have something in common most of the time), but none defined for pedophilia. Simply because it is not an actual disorder (i.e. nothing like for example schizophrenia), merely a sexual paraphilia. It is however often associated with antisocial personality disorder - though only with pedophiles who actually commit rape, which is (fortunately) a small amount of the total.

As for talking to someone... He did reach out to you, Shosh. And you betrayed him. Now I don't blame you, but consider how that makes him feel about talking to people about this. What his expectations would be. Betrayal online is one thing, but in real life it could have more serious consequences than getting a bad reputation on some message board.
That said, I too would like it if he could talk to someone.

Hmm. "Derive pleasure through" and "simply a sexual preference" seems to be the same thing. What is a sexual preference, if not simply the way you prefer to derive (sexual) pleasure? Do you think foot fetishists are sick? Or people who enjoy pegging? What about furries? Or people who fall in love with anime characters (e.g. that Korean guy who married his anime pillowcase)? I mean, I personally think all those are a bit... odd, but I wonder if you think they are actually sick?
Or do you think it is the actual part about children which is sick?

Finally, I asked about celibacy because a pedophile who wishes to stay on the right side of the law would have to be celibate. If the bulk of nuns/monks can do it with an act of will which is completely within reach of the average human, why would not Taylor be able to?

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

Funny how you reply to my reply to Shosh, Kevin.

He can, he just won't.
What do you think he tried to do here on this board? Not the right place for it, I agree, since this board is for movies... well, this particular section for a game. Sexual preferences is very much off topic. Yet, he did try to open up here, trying to find people whom he could talk about this with.

I wouldn't expect him to open up to some random person
Note to self: Shosh isn't random.

patient confidentiality
lololololol
Anyone bound by such confidentiality is also obliged to report any suspicion of a crime to the police. As I said, you're small time, but there are people out there who can affect a person's actual life.

implication
Implying implication, I asked if Shosh had those feelings because of the paraphilia being a paraphilia or if it was because of the specific nature of it.
To answer your question, I personally have no problem with whatever people think about/look at when they have sex/jack off. I only start having a problem when people affect other people without said people wanting it/being old enough to decide.

Why would he have to be celibate? He could have sex, just not with children.
Absolutely. But this the very worst case - obviously, it would be easier to be celibate only in respect to children than it would be to be celibate in respect to anyone. Any strict subset of a set is lesser than the full set.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

I'm very opinionated
Most people would consider that negative... Haha.

You make me sound like a gangster.
I'm happy to help the people of this board in any way possible.

Are you suggesting that if this was the case, they still shouldn't report it just incase it might inconvenience the poor paedophile?
Are you enjoying the construction of your strawmen? lol

If they jack off to pre-pubescent kids, I would care. I think most people would.
"Most people" also believed in witches once. Seriously why do you care what people jack off to. That, if anything, is perverted.

Now I know you may answer this with a side-step to avoid giving a straight answer and say something like you wouldn't allow anyone to be alone with your kids if they were just a family friend, but are you saying you wouldn't have more reservations about an admitted paedophile than you would about an average guy?
I'll answer straight only because I appreciate the double cut. I would allow someone who is very close to being a complete random stranger to babysit my kids because that's what most people do (e.g. neighborhood kid whom you barely know babysits but all she really does is watch TV and call her boyfriend. This is entirely standard fare and nothing to worry about). If I however find that said person had touched them inappropriately I'd beat said person to death with a suitable blunt instrument. That is regardless of any previous admission of being attracted to children, animals, marble coffee-tables or whatever.
Is that straight enough for you...

do you mean it'd be easier for a paedophile to abstain from sex with children than it would be for them to abstain from sex with adults?
Oh wow, lol, how obtuse can you get? No, that's not what I mean. I referred to your statement that he could have sex with adults. Indeed, he could, and that would likely lessen his attraction to children.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

Interesting conversation we have going.

As for talking to someone... He did reach out to you, Shosh. And you betrayed him. Now I don't blame you, but consider how that makes him feel about talking to people about this. What his expectations would be. Betrayal online is one thing, but in real life it could have more serious consequences than getting a bad reputation on some message board.
That said, I too would like it if he could talk to someone.


You have a point there, but he wasn't exactly reaching out to me in a completely honest way. He didn't spill his heart to me, because he didn't trust me, and rightly so. We spent most of our conversations arguing over our differences of opinion until he felt that we would just keep on going round and round and so then we stopped. Talking to a person who is certified would be much different and they would be bound by laws of confidentiality. But as far as our email conversation....betrayal is a bit strong. He claimed to know about it from the beginning.

Hmm. "Derive pleasure through" and "simply a sexual preference" seems to be the same thing. What is a sexual preference, if not simply the way you prefer to derive (sexual) pleasure? Do you think foot fetishists are sick? Or people who enjoy pegging? What about furries? Or people who fall in love with anime characters (e.g. that Korean guy who married his anime pillowcase)? I mean, I personally think all those are a bit... odd, but I wonder if you think they are actually sick?
Or do you think it is the actual part about children which is sick?



I could care less what sexual preferences people have as long as the other party has a say in things. There is a huge difference between consenting adults, or things that are not living, and a child. Children have no say and that is what makes it wrong.

Finally, I asked about celibacy because a pedophile who wishes to stay on the right side of the law would have to be celibate. If the bulk of nuns/monks can do it with an act of will which is completely within reach of the average human, why would not Taylor be able to?



He could stay celibate, and I hope that he chooses to. I know he believes that he can.





fly....be free

reply

Interesting conversation we have going.

(...)

I could care less what sexual preferences people have as long as the other party has a say in things. There is a huge difference between consenting adults, or things that are not living, and a child. Children have no say and that is what makes it wrong.
I agree.

But if the child paraphilia only ever takes the form of images of children, never touching them? And I don't mean child porn here, I mean e.g. commercial ad posters etc. featuring children? In my opinion, deriving pleasure from such would be no different than deriving pleasure from a commercial ad poster (or similar) featuring adults - which might or might not be creepy, but which definitely is neither illegal nor sick. Nor would being attracted (but not acting on it) to a child that you pass by on the street be any different from being attracted to (but not acting on) an adult whom you pass by on the street.

In both those cases, the adult you see on a poster or are attracted to when you pass them by have no say whatsoever in the matter. Yet it is not illegal and not considered sick in any way.

What would be sick is if you also forced yourself on them personally - and that would be sick regardless of age, I'm sure you agree. What I'm getting at here is... To me, thoughts doesn't matter. You can be sick inside and it won't matter, what matters - what concerns others - is what you do, not what you think.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

I fancy a pizza, if you could bring it to my door that'd be great.
Absolutely. I'd just need your home address... You can PM it to me if you're shy.

What straw men?
I'd quote your entire post, but you could just re-read it yourself instead.

Are you going to answer or avoid the question?
What question?

the reason I care is because it's a psychiatric disorder and it's sick, there's a line to be drawn.
So like the reason you care is because you care.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning

I asked if you'd have more reservations allowing a paedophile near your kids than you would an average guy. Even if they had no history of child molestation (that you knew of).
It would greatly benefit you to actually pay attention when people reply to your questions. I specifically said "That is regardless of any previous admission of being attracted to children, animals, marble coffee-tables or whatever." As far as I'm concerned, he or she is there to do a job and I'm going to assume that he or she can control themselves because that's what 99% of people can in such a situation.
Seriously, you're not only like a creationist, you're like one of those people who assume that all men rape when given the slightest inkling of a chance to do so. Well, as you know yourself you know others I guess, which speaks quite a lot about your own ability to control yourself.

Not very, evidently, perhaps you can teach me.
Of course.

Then how does this even relate to your original point? You initially said he would have to be celibate to stay on the right side of the law
No I didn't. Read again lol.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

Yemen
You lie, you live in the UK. Also, Yemen rd. only has one address on it, the presidential palace. Well too bad, I'll just have to eat this delicious thing myself.

Far as I can see, the straw men concept does not apply.
Well I told you to re-read it...

No, I just told you, I care because it's a psychiatric disorder
I see, and do you care about all psychiatric disorders then?

I'd find it questionable to even allow an adult male to babysit my kids
Well TBH I find male kindergarten teachers or whatever that's called to be kind of a freaky concept, but I'm not that paranoid, especially if it's a family friend or so.

I don't assume that all men rape at all, but when it comes to men with psychiatric disorders I don't believe in taking chances when I'd be risking my children's lives getting ruined, or worse. Furthermore, as if the fact that they're mentally ill isn't enough of a deterrent etc etc blah blah
But are you seriously saying that all disorders are equal now? I wouldn't trust a non-pedophile schizophrenic with my children, but pedophilia is merely a sexual preference. It's like a heterosexual male gynecologist, that's ok, he's doing his job.

I don't think anyone finds you funny or clever
Do you think I aim at A) being funny or clever, or B) being boring as *beep* since you're the only one reading this anyway?

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

Actually that was a reference to Friends.
Sure it was. Sorry, can't hear you over how delicious this extra-cheese pan pizza is.

Some more than others, specifically the ones that pose a risk to children.
Mhm. So you do care because you care, then.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning

You find male kindergarten teachers a freaky concept, men who teach classes full of children in a public school with other teachers around, but you don't find it freaky to allow an adult male to babysit your kids alone in your house?
You learn fast! Well, ok, not really fast, but let's say... Ah, let's be honest and call it slow, actually. Yes. You are kind of slow, Kevin. But I'm sure you knew that already.

how is it anything like a male gynaecologist?
Male heterosexual gynecologist who spend his day looking at women's private parts, pedophile who babysits your kids, how is that not like each other? That's a question.

I'm not the only one reading this, Shosh is almost certainly reading
Hi Shosh I actually like your posts, unlike those of your so-called friend here. Did you meet him yet? In real life I mean. His name is Kevin and he says he lives in Yemen. I think he's lying, let's go to my place, I got some pizza for us both.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

Hi Shosh I actually like your posts, unlike those of your so-called friend here. Did you meet him yet? In real life I mean. His name is Kevin and he says he lives in Yemen. I think he's lying, let's go to my place, I got some pizza for us both.



Howdy! I don't think it matters whether or not I have met Kevin in real life. You know the Yemen thing was a joke you nut! Glad you like my posts...but I still think that you are arguing simply for the sake of arguing. Do you really believe what you post? Because a lot of it doesn't make much sense.

I don't take pizza from strangers. Sorry!

fly....be free

reply

You're replying for someone else again, Kevin. Might it be the obvious?

Those thoughts don't just remain in his head, not only does he express them on here but they also spill out into his every day life regarding gawking at kids in the street and masturbating over them as well as spending countless cash on child-related items, drawing pictures of his 11 year-old sister's school friend
As I explained above, that behaviour would be totally acceptable for most people if the object of his affection was an adult.

according to the witness's accusations even attempting to groom a child on here.
lol
Witness? You mean "Jade"? Say, what's her account name again?

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

If you don't like it, you shouldn't have gotten involved.
In what? If you mean I should PM her instead, then sure, that might be a good idea since some people apparently think that all public posts are directed to themselves.

His level of obsession would probably still be considered creepy even if it was an adult, he'd be the equivalent of one of those freaks that are besotted with female celebrities considering he spends tons of money on rare memorabilia just to drool over the child
Yeah and there are millions of people like that. Literally. Yet there's a problem because person X that he will never meet anyway happens to be younger than age Y at the moment? You are ridiculous.

What's it to you, lad?
Anyone can make a second account and PM himself that KevinologyDeletedAccount22 () did whatever, but that proves nothing.

paedophilic tendencies
Nah, too tight, I wouldn't fit.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

I don't think they're directed to me
Sure you do.

take a look at my track record on here and you'll see that I've literally never lied about anything at all. Ever.
See, that's the point - contacting "Jade" personally would be a part of looking at your "track record". If she's real, then you didn't lie, if she's not, then you did - there's only one way to make sure. And you won't tell me her account name. So what am I to believe?

You are ridiculous.
When it fuels a potentially harmful obsession and psychiatric disorder, yes.
You fell for it!

Didn't you say you were a 30 year-old virgin or something?
Absolutely. I also claimed that there's a connection between neurotic and psychotic disorders

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

But if the child paraphilia only ever takes the form of images of children, never touching them? And I don't mean child porn here, I mean e.g. commercial ad posters etc. featuring children? In my opinion, deriving pleasure from such would be no different than deriving pleasure from a commercial ad poster (or similar) featuring adults - which might or might not be creepy, but which definitely is neither illegal nor sick.


To me it is still sick if you are getting sexual pleasure from pictures of children. I don't care if it is commercially produced or not. And the thing about obsessions is that the person who is doing the obsessing finds themselves in a place of wanting more over time. What was satisfying to begin with doesn't cut it anymore.

Nor would being attracted (but not acting on it) to a child that you pass by on the street be any different from being attracted to (but not acting on) an adult whom you pass by on the street.



I disagree. I see a huge difference. We will have to agree to disagree on this. Being sexually attracted to children is wrong. Plain and simple.

In both those cases, the adult you see on a poster or are attracted to when you pass them by have no say whatsoever in the matter. Yet it is not illegal and not considered sick in any way.


You are technically correct....but I still think it is sick if a child is involved. Again, we will just have to agree to disagree.

To me, thoughts doesn't matter. You can be sick inside and it won't matter, what matters - what concerns others - is what you do, not what you think.


To me thoughts are what define us. "We think, therefore we are". Frequently, thoughts become actions.

fly....be free

reply

bum buddy
The only time I've even heard that expression was in that Ali G movie, it was hilarious lol.

I don't know why you keep linking to concepts
Just pointing out that your posts are extremely formulaic. If you want, I can pick apart one of your posts and tell you what you did wrong, and how you can improve.

You gonna address the point like a big boy or just skate around it?
What do you mean? I gave you an answer, straight as can be. Here I can repeat it right back to you: Yes I think that male kindergarten teachers is a weird concept, and no I would not have a problem with an adult male babysitting my children.
Of course, not a random adult male off the street, but your original question alluded to family/family friends.
Actually, I think you have some sort of inability to realize that people can have a different opinion than yourself. One of the classical signs of autism. Didn't that run in the family for you btw?

Is it a paedophile's job to touch or look at the child's genitalia?
"Pedophile" isn't a profession... What is your point...

I take it back, you clearly must be a hit with the ladies.
I never hit a lady unless she deserves it.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

Do you really believe what you post? Because a lot of it doesn't make much sense.

I don't take pizza from strangers. Sorry!
Of course I believe what I say - what I say to you, that is. The things I say to Kevin you should take with a very large pinch of salt, since mostly I'm just checking to see how far he's willing to jump. He's quite the little terrier, haha.

And what do you mean by "stranger"? It's me, qvtkc. Just as well though, because I already finished off the pizza. Maybe later.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

Of course I believe what I say - what I say to you, that is. The things I say to Kevin you should take with a very large pinch of salt


Nice to know you can make the admission.

since mostly I'm just checking to see how far he's willing to jump. He's quite the little terrier, haha.


I would put him more in the league of a pitbull. He is VERY tenacious. I wouldn't mess with him.

And what do you mean by "stranger"? It's me, qvtkc. Just as well though, because I already finished off the pizza. Maybe later.


Yeah, like I know you from Adam. Ah well, next time!

fly....be free

reply

Whatever you want to believe, makes no difference to me, I'm not giving up the account name of the witness just so you can pass it on to your bum buddy and he can go start insulting her and following her around.
But... You already know her account name. Why would I give it to you?

What's important to me is that I know I didn't lie

"You just need to check my track record"
followed by
"NUUUUUH I KNOW I DIDN'T LIE"
Come on man, I mean... I didn't even set that one up, you're doing this to yourself now. I sort of feel like a bully now actually. Why are you hitting yourself? lol

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

To me it is still sick if you are getting sexual pleasure from pictures of children.

(...)

You are technically correct
We can agree to disagree, but I'd like to hear your reasons for doing so. Apart from just "it's sick", because frankly, there are a lot of things that are sick and we accept them anyway because they don't affect anyone else.

To me thoughts are what define us. "We think, therefore we are". Frequently, thoughts become actions.
I agree - however, thoughts do not randomly become actions, nor do all thoughts become actions. We've all had somewhat crazy thoughts at times. That's basically psychology 101 - the first thing they teach you is that everyone is nuts on the inside in some way or the other. The difference between crazy people and sane people is that crazies act on those thoughts, while sane people recognize a crazy thought for what it is, and dismisses it.

Now, sure. Pedophilia is considered a mental disorder. However, it is only a sexual attraction to children - it has nothing to do with other mental faculties one might have, such as one's grasp on reality or one's sense of judgement. Now I'm not saying there are no child molesters - I'm simply saying that most people can control themselves when faced with their own mind, and there's nothing that separates pedophiles in general from that group.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

We can agree to disagree, but I'd like to hear your reasons for doing so. Apart from just "it's sick", because frankly, there are a lot of things that are sick and we accept them anyway because they don't affect anyone else.



I have seen how sexual abuse of children effects them and have been on the receiving end also. Let's just say that I react strongly. I don't have to accept things that are sick. It is my prerogative.

Now, sure. Pedophilia is considered a mental disorder. However, it is only a sexual attraction to children - it has nothing to do with other mental faculties one might have, such as one's grasp on reality or one's sense of judgement. Now I'm not saying there are no child molesters - I'm simply saying that most people can control themselves when faced with their own mind, and there's nothing that separates pedophiles in general from that group.


I would think that if someone has a mental "disorder", it would mean that something wasn't in order, mentally. I am not sure that I would trust a pedophile to always make the right decision. I also said that "frequently thoughts become actions"....NOT that they always do. I believe that what you put on the stage of your mind and allow to play there WILL become the most important thing to you, and so a big part of controlling your actions is controlling your thoughts. Would a pedophile control themselves??? I don't know, but I do know that they are obsessive.

fly....be free

reply

I've indexed the remarks for you so that you can keep better track of them. I look forward to seeing an improvement here!

I have a family member who is autistic, yes
1. Reveal of personal info. Don't do it. Not even if it's made up.

Would you like to stoop low enough to insult her some more to show everyone what a hilarious troll you are?
2. Asking forward questions. Whomever you are discussing with would either ignore this line, or press further about your retard sister and how she's autistic because your mother did too much drugs during her pregnancy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6lb-0nbZys so sad meth baby

Or, hey, you could just continue to make light of the the situation and mask the fact that you don't have a clue what you're talking about and hope people will believe you really are trolling.
3. Allusion to the fact that people may be reading. Of course they are not, apart from maybe Shosh and whomever you choose to link to this post. Can't really help you here, as trying to make the other person look like a troll is at best laughing material. If you'd be right it wouldn't be effective since the other person would be trying to troll you, and if you're wrong it would just be ignored. If it's both (which, if I may allow a personal remark, it is in this case), you are doubly screwed, since you're facing an opponent with both topical knowledge and a disregard for common conversational conventions.

I think maybe one of the reasons you don't like me replying to your posts is that I'm wise to your pseudo-trolling methods and yet still remain persistent.
4. Making erroneous assumptions about the other person. Don't do it. Again, if you're right I have nothing to worry about and if you are wrong, I certainly don't. Also, if you think you've found a trigger, don't ask about it, unless you think it's a fake one.

I suppose one of the reasons you're a 30 year-old virgin is that you're not man enough to be straight with people and the chances are you haven't had the balls to ask a girl out.
5. Trying to trip a non-existent trigger. Even if it would be nearly true (something like that is realistically never completely true), all the opponent need to do is recall one time where he did work up his courage.

Does a lack of balls in males run in your family?
6. Asking an easily deflected question (i.e. "I don't know, I am the first male for 400 years in my family"). It's better than a simple statement since it places obligation on your target, but still, don't do it, especially not after so many mistakes. Simply come up with a better question.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

Aw, she's adorable.
I guess you're a better judge of that than I am... Anyway it's not actually Kevin's sister (I think).

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

In trolling or being a virgin? Because the former I rarely stoop to anymore and the latter... well, I can't really go back in time...
Trolling, of course! And yes, you do "stoop" to it - in fact I've never seen a non-troll post by you on IMDb. Other boards, sure, but not this one.

probably practice what you preach
I do. I make an exception for things that I'm proud of.

I don't have a sister, gramps.
But you do. You might wish that you didn't, but that's neither here nor there. It's cruel of you to wish that she never was born, of course, but... Oooo another reply? I'll get that later.

The question is why disregard, alliteration aside, common conversational conventions conveniently at the point where your argument has been swept aside unless it's a weak attempt to disguise the fact that your logic is flawed?
But this is the core right here, Kevin - we both know that you are unable to keep a discussion without throwing tantrums, resorting to intentional fallacies and other general shenanigans, so why would I apply logic to you?

By the way, good luck at the Pseudo-Convoluted Paragraph awards, takes a bit more than that to impress me.
7. Failure to notice that my grammar was, actually, incorrect. I've dropped an easier one in this post, let's see if you can catch that.

You're assuming my intention is to make you worry
No, I know your intentions. Why would I be directly addressing them? Pay attention.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance#The_Effort-Justifica tion_Paradigm

Well in this case the opponent's capacity for recollection appears to be slowly diminishing
That doesn't matter in cases when the opponent is just posting to waste your time. I mean look at how long it took to type that paragraph.

the difference between a regular question and a rhetorical one
That's not how you spell "rhetorical".

painstakingly linear method
Do I, now... Say, are you doing anything tonight?

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

Type faster.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

A pitbull is a kind of terrier... But no, I wouldn't call him that. Those actually have a bite!
And I'll take that as a promise!

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

And I'll take that as a promise!


promise of what?

fly....be free

reply

merely began to answer everything with either an unfunny joke or a side-step
I only ever answer with jokes and side steps lol.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

We both know that's not true
To you, to you.

I maintained my viewpoint effectively
No, you lied and threw ad hominems all over the thread. Recognizing a troll, I discarded you from the debate. And you still didn't reply to my final question in that thread, by the way.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

I didn't say you need to check my track record, I said take a look at it and you'll see I don't lie.
How am I, or anyone else, supposed to do that with you withholding said track record from us, huh? Or more to the point, why would you do it, unless you had something to hide?

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

I'm withholding only one thing
Yeah. The one thing that would allow for people to check the facts, of course. NUEEEEEEHHH I KNOW IM NOT LYING

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

I'm sorry to hear that. And I agree, child abuse is sick. But that's just it. Abuse is sick. Thoughts, or even collections of photos or whatever, isn't abuse.
Sure, though, as you say "something isn't in order". But if the tail light of your car is broken, does that mean that you can't brake if something jumps out in the road in front of you? Something is still wrong with your car, but not all things are wrong with it. Now you have a broken tail light... should you take it to the mechanic and replace it? Sure. But your brakes still work no matter what.
No, not all disorders are alike. That would be equalizing, say, dyslexia, with multiple personality disorder. Which would be completely wrong.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

skates around them a different way by making some strangely unfunny quip in the hope that people will believe he meant to make an ass out of himself.
And yet in my posts to her I don't? I only reply that way to you, Kevin. That's so you shouldn't feel left out even though you are unable to keep it up with the adults.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

When you're up to the challenge and feel like a legitimate debate
We can do that right here and now, but you've frequently shown that you can't handle a real debate, Kevin.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

I'm sorry to hear that. And I agree, child abuse is sick. But that's just it. Abuse is sick. Thoughts, or even collections of photos or whatever, isn't abuse.


Do you really think that someone just on the spur of the moment decides to abuse??? NO, they will have thought of nothing else and dwelt on the fact that they needed to keep feeding their obsession until somethiing changes. THOUGHTS PRECEDE ACTIONS!

Thoughts DO matter, and you can argue until the cows come home and I won't change my mind, because I have long decided how I feel about this.

No, not all disorders are alike. That would be equalizing, say, dyslexia, with multiple personality disorder. Which would be completely wrong.


I never said that all disorders are alike.

fly....be free

reply

I don't enjoy following the paedophile around with a megaphone
But you're not following anyone around with a megaphone... You're sitting on your ass tracking someone via the internet.

When I troll, I inject a very large element of humour into it
Posting a wink smiley isn't "humor".

You're proud of being a virgin? You're not one of those saving-it-for-marriage blokes, are you?
Of course I am. It's a religious thing. Of course, I've had girlfriends, but all we did was kiss and feel around things, since we didn't want to ruin anything. It's hard to find someone you really want to spend the rest of your life with though.
I'm a devout atheist

inventing a family member
It's your little sister we're talking about. You should not allow yourself to forget that she exists just because you hate her.

emotionally invested
Yes we all know that your life revolves around sitting on IMDb lol, but being "emotionally invested" in your own trolling () does not constitute participating in a debate.

You shouldn't presume to know my intentions
But your intentions are clear as can be, Kevin...

every now and then your mask slips and you accidentally make a serious point
No I don't. When did I ever do that?

Are you coming onto me?
No, just asking to see if you'd be replying to nonsense posts on some internet board last night. So what did you do?

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

When I troll, I inject a very large element of humour into it, you can ask Shosh about that


Yep, Kevin tells the truth here. He encountered me several years ago and proceeded to hand my ass to me but in such a way that I was laughing hard! He is a funny guy when he trolls. Several of my friends on the board switched sides during the session and said that they couldn't hate on a guy that was so damned funny. traitors!

fly....be free

reply

Haha do you read your own posts?

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

Yes, and you and I both know that I was being facetious. And now I am seeing your sarcasm as well.


fly....be free

reply

in some instances, questions of personal conduct, character, motives, etc., are legitimate and relevant to the issue
Sure, but that didn't apply. In fact, in your very first reply to me, you did the following:

* Link to a sex-offender-tracking website as proof that all pedophiles rape
* Claim some "you don't agree with me so you must be a pedo" defense
* Demanding proof of well-known psychiatric principles (proof that you ignored when it was provided)

I don't believe I lied about a single thing
You lie whenever you say you want a debate. What you want is for people to think that you have something to say lol

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

The one thing? What about the rest of my track record? None of the screenshots are doctored or edited in any way
How are we supposed to know? The IMDb post format isn't really hard to do a shop of, even you could do it. You could provide links to the posts instead, but of course your account doesn't even exist anymore.

I don't think there's any reason at all to consider me a liar
You make outrageous claims without valid proof. Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof, yet you can't even produce the slightest thing.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

I'm not the one side-stepping and quipping, son.
"son"?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

I win.

Want another round? Seriously, when you can avoid the fallacies etc., we can have a debate, and it'll be the hardest thing you have ever done in your whole life. Or you can continue making a fool out of yourself.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

Yes, thoughts precede actions, but not all thoughts become actions. And I know that I can't change your mind, Shosh. What I'm asking is merely why you have the opinion that you have - your reasoning behind it. I don't want to change your mind, I just want to understand you.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

I have shared with you why. Do you understand now?

fly....be free

reply

I was speaking metaphorically
But you weren't speaking... You were typing. Seriously I think you need to go through some sort of semantics course before being allowed on the internet again. Please notify your superior about this immediately.

Yes, going any further might've risked over-inflating the poor girl.
Oooo I see what you did there but actually I've never owned one of those. Also you forgot to put your signature "" smiley so that people realize that it's humor.

Especially for someone like you.
Well... Yes. There's too many people. You never know what you're missing once you settle down with just one.
...but you wouldn't know that, now would you.

I can't hate someone who doesn't exist
Now now, it's your little sister we're talking about. You should not allow yourself to forget that she exists just because you hate her.

good thing that analogy doesn't apply to me
But you do:
This board is reserved for discussions about: Final Fantasy IX (2000) (VG)

Is this the part where I go back and look for quotes in your posts, to which point you then say something like "I didn't say that." and giggle to yourself like a schoolboy?
YES! Now go fetch.

None of your beeswax, sunshine.
In other words, "not much else".

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

Let's hope your friend eventually picks it up too. I have not too high hopes, though.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

I have watched Kevin run circles around you in these debates. I have no doubt he already has your number.

I know that I do.

fly....be free

reply

One out of three, well almost.
No, you did all of the items on that list.

30 year-old virgin
I lost my virginity at 13, you tool. And that is sort of on topic, since she was 21.

I don't even remember you denying it.
Are you calling me a liar?

I want both, for people to think I have something to say, which I do
No, you don't. As soon as an actual debate starts, you fall apart in circular arguments and various other fallacies. If you have something to say, then sure, do so. I've never seen it done.

Well, ok; unless you mean "watch out for this guy who doesn't even live in the same country as you", lol. I have seen you say that, that much I must admit.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

he'd be whining that they were edited but instead he whined that they were taken out of context but admitted that he did indeed say those things
Please provide proof that he admitted it. You could try screenshots... Oh, wait.

Shosh will also testify to that as she has seen a lot of what he's typed too.
Oh wait, your friend will testify in your favor? How credible. I'm not attacking her integrity but... really, now.

I back up screenshots with everything I say
You mean "I back up everything I say with screenshots", l2grammar please. Also, that means nothing; you say something and then back it up with evidence which is not only possible but actually also very easy to fake.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

You have a... personal experience with it, which is sad, but that is not reason to judge anyone simply by association. I mean, I understand that part, but I don't understand how you can judge everyone by what happened in one case.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

Oh good God, I am not judging Rapunzel based simply on my past experience. I have spent a long time watching the things that he says and then had my own email session with him over the course of a month and a half. At the end of all of that, I have my own thoughts about him. I do not judge everyone based on my history....as a matter of fact, I am rather nonjudgemental. I have conquered my own demons and problems in life and simply offered Rapunzel an ear to try and help him see that he might need professional help. I had to have help to get me passed a rough time in my life...I see no stigma attached to it.

fly....be free

reply

I used this method myself a matter of days ago
You mean "a few days ago"? "A matter of days ago" is simply not correct grammar. It is colloquial English if you live in the north, but I expected a cosmopolitan character like you to live in London.

You're starting to bore me


It was humour?
Well, I assumed so. With your posts it's impossible to tell.

sitting on your ass in front of the TV and surfing porn sites at all hours of the night
Joke's on you, I almost never watch TV. And I sleep at night. I surf for porn on my work hours, it's better use of that time.

Are we gonna play that game where you repeat yourself
No, I'm just reminding you about your autistic sister and your meth addict mother. It's really not kind of you to pretend that they don't exist.

by that logic everyone who posts a single off-topic message is a troll.
Yes, they are. Unless they are in the sand/soapbox board, where posting off topic is, eh, impossible I guess, since off-topic is on topic there.

Fetch what, your dignity?
I actually forgot and can't be arsed to check, so you're off the hook this time.

No, in other words, "none of your business".
No, actually, "not much else". Admit it.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

Of course he's running circles around me. That's because I sit in the middle and post whatever *beep* enters my brain, and he actually consider it enough to reply to it. I have no problem watching some guy run in circles while I feed him whispers of nothing.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

Of course he's running circles around me. That's because I sit in the middle and post whatever *beep* enters my brain, and he actually consider it enough to reply to it. I have no problem watching some guy run in circles while I feed him whispers of nothing.



Oh brother....you and your gigantic ego. smh

fly....be free

reply

[deleted]

Nope, I did not.
Yes, you did. If you want, I can create a screenshot for evidence.

Sure ya did.
No I didn't... When will you learn, seriously? Everything I say is a lie.

In general? Yeah, pretty much.
Well, I'm offended. I practically never lie.

I was saying you didn't deny it, which was strange. Are you a paedophile?
Denying things in an internet debate? What good would that do?
Are you a pedophile?
No I am not.
I think you are!
But... I am not
Ok you definitely are. Here are some screenshots where you admit it.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

You already know he said what was in the screenshots
No I don't. If I were I wouldn't be asking you. I don't have time to read the megabytes of nonsense you two spew out on these boards. I want the facts, preferably ones not pasted together in Photoshop, but the real ones.

Running out of material already?
I'm still on my first material, you know, the one where I ask you about your "proof".

tell-tale signs
Yes. When an image is saved in lossy formats such as .jpg, they are not 100% perfectly replicable - which leads to so called compression artifacts. The most common one is blocking, which looks like large, almost monochromatic squares. Another common artifact is the Moiré pattern which occurs due to so-called "beats" in the cosine transform used. These artifacts worsen with each edit, so that a cut-and-paste job with repeated saves tend to look rather noticeable.
You can get away from that by using a lossless format such as .bmp or .png, but you still have the problem of shadows, coloring etc. That is not a problem here though - IMDb posts (and PMs) are simple grey boxes with a blue border on top. All the text use standard fonts. There are no patterns which must match up, no shadows which must look natural... Nothing. With some care, you could make such a post from scratch in MS Paint, but a far simpler version would be to make a new account, post whatever you want Taylor to "say" on a rarely-visited board, take a screenshot of that, paste in his name which you take from one of his actual posts, and then delete the thread and forget that the account ever existed.

Of course, you already know all this because you already did it.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

Really? No, there's no big deal in getting help for overcoming a problem that you have. But you still see pedophiles as being unable of self-control, as being obsessive, etc. You still see it as "sick" without seeing to the nature of that "sickness". To me that is like those people who don't want to hug cancer patients.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

Really? No, there's no big deal in getting help for overcoming a problem that you have. But you still see pedophiles as being unable of self-control, as being obsessive, etc. You still see it as "sick" without seeing to the nature of that "sickness".


Eh? This makes no sense at all. I had a problem....I sought professional help. I got better. Pedophile has a problem....he refuses to seek professional help. He is not going to get better.

How can this not make sense to you?

To me that is like those people who don't want to hug cancer patients.



whatever.

fly....be free

reply

I don't live in London.
lol peasant

Well, I can see you're a stand-up guy. Say, where do you work?
No, I don't do stand-up. I've tried, but run out of actually funny material instantly. I am pretty good at being boring, though!
Also nice try lol

Now I have a meth addicted mother?
Well maybe not anymore. I heard someone died in your family lately. My condolences. Hopefully not your mother since how could then your little sister ever eat or go on the toilet or such.
...
...
Hey I know someone we can ask to help her out.

little cotton socks
I got huge feet lol

As I said, none of your business.
Nooo I think it was "not much else".

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

Do you even live in the UK?
Of course not, but I've been there, and the only place where people are at least half decent is in London. The rest of the little island seems to be some sort of park for the mentally deranged, especially in the southwestern parts.

That actually did make me laugh.
yeah lol admit it, admit it.

And a red shiny nose with white make-up?
Nope, just the huge feet.

Nope, none of your business.
No, I decidedly think it was not much else.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

I just did...
...a mess. Oh man you are so easy.

None of your business.
Noooot - much - else.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

And the funny part is, you actually think you're wasting my time, when I've had you on ignore before on my old account and the minute I get too bored of you, you go right back on.
lol I get the honor of getting onto your ignore list.

The human psyche fascinates me
Same here. It is truly a fascinating thing.

step it up a little because once you lose my interest, you lose my attention.
I'm aiming at being boring so no. Also, I am telling you this and I still didn't lose your attention.

I'm still waiting for that pizza
I told you, give me your home address and you will get your pizza.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

Then your life will be complete.
No, it's just phase 1 of my grand master plan.

You're not allowed to agree with me, shut up.
LOL U MAD

Not entirely true, I found that rather morbid joke about my non-existent autistic sister and meth-addicted mother who is not addicted to meth to be rather amusing, and I now know what the word 'debugged' really means.
Don't forget that I also taught you how to fake screenshots, which, judging from your profile, you have already started doing.

15 Yemen Road, Yemen
No I'm pretty sure you don't live in Yemen. Besides I don't know any good pizza place there.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

Those have been there for ages mate
That's what you'd like people to believe, but you actually just made them last night, didn't you?

here's the Blue Peter badge
AND HE ADMITS DEFEAT






Part 2 is even better. Too bad you can't see it.


This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

Ooh, please do. Let's see how high you'll jump.
No you have to, like, really want it. Like really really want it. Come on, focus. You want it?

In that case then, everything you say is the truth?
The truth was never a lie until I spoke it.

The only thing you never do is say something funny or remotely clever.
Correct. And yet you reply

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

Is that what you say to your inflatable girlfriend?
No, you are the only one for me, Kevin.

Because I am a funny guy.
And then you go like
Riiight.
You know, it's not really that funny.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

But I wasn't aiming for funny that time!
Well you know what they say about being inadvertently funny.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

I do indeed.
So why does it say heterosexual on your profile page?

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

my raw sexual magnetism
Now you were funny again

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

foreign concept
Not really, I see it all the time, but let's face it, you are British.

Oh wait. Foreign concept. Ah some good old British humor, a pun, hahah awesome. More please.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

Mm-hmm, a foreign concept to some people.




Take a bow!

fly....be free

reply

[deleted]

Like I said, ask the paedophile if I Photoshopped them.
Why would I do that when I can make a screen of him saying that you did...
EDIT: I thought of something.
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/11/iphotoshoppedthem.png/

You're resorting to commenting on my grammar
I also commented on your spelling last week and I'm still going. Well, sitting. You are running, in circles no less, I heard that from a trusted source.

worrying that you know so much about faking screenshots
Anyone who has been on the internet more than 2 months should know how to spot a fake screenshot, except when there is no way to spot one of course. Like with IMDb posts.

but the entire theory is de-bugged
You mean "debunked". Debugging is what you do when you fix software bugs.

Furthermore, what about the screenshots of his Photobucket, YouTube, shrine site to Brooke Shields, desktop wallpaper etc. ?
Those are probably your photos. You are a Brooke Shields fan right?

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

my genuine screenshots
You don't have genuine screenshots, you screenshot-faker. And before you deny it, I have proof that you fake screenshots!!
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/11/iphotoshoppedthem.png/

So I guess that means I'm getting exercise
Yeah I thought you might need it.

I doubt anyone who's been on the internet for a matter of months even knows what a screenshot is.
Maybe not your kind of months, no.

Hey, you learn something new every day.
lol are you serious? How can you be 24 and not know what debugging is? Did you fail 4th grade or something?

No, not even remotely.
Well you are quite fanatical so I wouldn't put it past you to buy the photos anyway just to make some sort of weirdo shrine for her and blame an innocent poster for it.

what you're saying is that I uploaded the photos myself to a Photobucket account, and all of the videos on YouTube, and created a shrine website to Brooke Shields, and took a screenshot of two desktop wallpapers on Windows 7 which I do not have, containing desktop icons in Dutch which I do not speak, faked hundreds of screenshots, invented a witness... and persuaded several other people to join in the elaborate hoax and pretend he really did say all those things? That's your argument?
I'm not even saying it, you are. You are so guilty that the... wait... not having Windows 7? Please tell me that you are on a Mac then at least.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

my genuine screenshots
Yeah calm down calm down lol. Also you don't have genuine screenshots, you Photoshopped them, remember?

Now drop down and give me 20.
I'm not giving you any money, especially not if I'm going down. I might consider it if you... No, I don't think it'd be worth it, even if you would.

Yes, here in Britain months are very different.
...I know, that's what I said. Pay attention.

We don't have 'grades' in the sense that you Americans do
But I live in Europe and we have grades. Thank you for confirming my belief that the British school system is stuck in the 1700s.

When I was in school, teaching children to detect and remove errors from computer software wasn't exactly the norm.
...what... You guys really are stuck!

What is this 'Mac' you speak of? Some sort of Scottish equivalent to Windows?
Yes. I'll admit, I was trying to guess if you were in Scotland or some other part of the UK.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

I think it's more that she sees him as being obsessive and potentially out of control, rather than all paedophiles.
I'd agree if his "condition" was worsening, but as I said he was posting on the Dakota board in 2005 when I arrived there, and was the same back then.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

now he steals photos of and drools over his 11 year-old baby sister's school friend, and has been accused of grooming a child on IMDb. Now he sees one movie with a child in it, then immediately starts buying all movies with them
Yeah that's what I told you. Still the same old same old

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

Not according to Metal, who was also around then
But he wasn't. He arrived in late 2006. I'm pretty sure of that since I stopped posting there around mid-2006, and when I came back next year he was there, reposting entire news updates about Dakota instead of just linking to them like normal people do.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

if he was there since 2006 and says Taylor's condition has worsened since then
But Taylor - or yorda22 as he was known back then - deleted his account in early 2006 (I remember the incident) and didn't visit IMDb for over a year. So yeah. Metal did see him once he got back, but he did not see him back in 2005.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

Really now? Tell me, what was this incident?
No wait. It wasn't that incident, but it happened the week after. A guy named Primalchair or something like that came to the Dakota board and started - lol - calling everyone a pedophile.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

You're useless.
That's what she said.

Note to self: Stop using that one at random.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

Some problems you need to seek help for. Some, you don't. You don't go to the doctor if you get a papercut, now do you? You put on a band-aid and wait until it heals because not much else is needed.
As I said, you see every pedophile as being unable of self-control, because that's what your experience tells you. But what if you're wrong?

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

You're comparing paedophilia to a paper cut? Seriously?
I never said anything about any paper cut!

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

um, yeah you did.

We are just going round and round in circles now, and I am beginning to think you just enjoy being difficult. As far as you and I are concerned, we will have to agree to disagree on the issue at hand.



fly....be free

reply

No, and you really should own up to it, Shosh. Your inability to differentiate between two persons just because they happen to share the same problem, is the very reason people like Taylor hesitates about seeking help.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply


What? What two persons.

And how can you blame the fact that Taylor is hesitating to seek help on me? You are loony.

fly....be free

reply

Two persons, as in Taylor, of course, and the one that you mentioned having a personal experience of (I do trust that they are not the same person). Taylor is refusing to seek help not directly because of you, but because many people share the same attitude as you.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

Talk about enabling someone to continue down a destructive path....

My own personal experience with pedophilia helped lay the pathway for my self-destructive character, which led to a whole myriad or issues as a way to cope with that. If I have a way to save some other child from the pain and crap that I went through, I will do it. In this case, it meant trying to help Taylor see that he could use the help. The fact that he refuses is his own issue and nothing to do with me.

ETA: What you fail to realize...is that I see his pain and tried to get him to acknowledge his own coping mechanisms. I do not see a monster.

fly....be free

reply

Well that's good. But you still seem certain that he will go over the edge if he doesn't get help. Are you a trained psychologist?

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

No, and I have never claimed to be. I am not certain of anything. I just hope that he is right when he says he will never touch a child.


fly....be free

reply

Ok. I think he is right. He seems like a very level-headed character. While, yes, he does go off on quite a spree when encountering new actresses, and while he is very enthusiastic about for example his new Dakota Fanning picture, he does seem to have a very good grasp on what is real and what is not.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

Can you show me where I begged her?


Can you prove to me that Rapunzel is a paedo?

I don't claim he's a paedophile, he is a paedophile, it's a proven fact.


If that is the case then you are a proven stalker who collects screenshots and loves to talk about masturbation .

I've grown up lad, it's time you joined me. This is tall talk, we're waiting for ya.


Who is 'we' lol? *Alllll alone* http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_NdBiLlVl8&feature=related

Now you're being creepy, stop it.


Coming from a stalker thats sweet, .

I have an obsession with masturbation because I inform other people about a paedophile who admitted to masturbating to children?


You infrom people who dont care, and yes it is an obsession as in most of your comments masturbation is involved. .

Because I don't need sticking up for, does it look like I'm struggling to you?


Yes, as you keep trying to end the debate, plus you do need help from your friends and you can tell by how defensive you are.

Know when to stop, I gave you this advice in our last PM session. Learn from it.


Hmmm... You taught me a lesson? I think you have the memory of a goldfish because from looking at our messages I actually was the only one to have valid points and you kept making me repeat myself because you knew you were being beat so later I decided you were a waste of my time. .

Eh?? Now you're just pulling things out of thin air.


No, if you can assume than Rapunzel is a paedo by how he talks about kids then I am allowed to assum how you masturbate to screenshots of people talking about kids, there is as much evidence out there as there apparently is against Rapunzel.

Where's your evidence that my claims are false? Cough up, boy.


Again proff that you dont read by comments. You only assume you technically have no evidence son.

You claim there are many people who want him (like you) off IMDb yet... I have not seen one person who is as passionate as you, so that must mean even the people who have seen the 'evidence' dont care .

Learn how to give a proper debate as you are failing miserably, this can be proven by how angry you are getting and defensive you started to get when I claimed you masturbate to screenshots. .

Alllll alone, everyone now and then you get a little bit lonely... - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_NdBiLlVl8&feature=related - This is now the song that I am now going to associate with you .

__

Jesus, that's really super... How'd a nitwit like you get so tasteful?

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

As I have a screenshot of him admitting to pleasuring himself to 6 year-old children which he will not even deny if you asked him outright... yes. A resounding yes.


No it is not evidence he is only saying he is have you seen him masturbate? No.

And accurate...


Oh good your also getting there you can admit your a stalker. .

You ignored this point before. Ignore it again, I'll simply repeat it.


Now you know how I and Rapunzel feel.

When have I tried to end the debate? I said I tried to take the high road and suggested you walk away, I myself am not going anywhere, lad.


Yes exactly lol you told me to walkaway therfore the debate would have ended dumbass.

I'm on the defensive because you initiated the unsuccessful attack and you're the one disputing my claims. Obviously, as the one being brought into question, in a debate I'm required to provide substance, evidence and elaboration to support my points, which I've done. Now you're left firing blanks like a muppet.


If it is so unsucessful why were you defensive lol. Also you have no substance nor evidence its just your opnion and your assumptions on the subject at hand.

By the way you are the on looking like a muppet by following people around on the web. .

And I'm glad you said you were looking at our messages, I myself moved on from it ages ago and you're still dwelling on it which proves my point from earlier regarding the reason behind your involvement. Thanks.


Again more assumptions that I am dwelling on a conversation that happened a long time a go, you seem to be the one thats bringing it up soooooo... Yeah...

I think I'll let whomever may be reading this (if there is anyone) decide for themselves what the likelihood is of you defeating me in a debate, judging from your current behaviour.


My current behaviour is totally rational yours is absurd and irrational, anyone reading this will laugh at you for making yourself look stupid and wasting your free time by following someone on the internet.

If it's still there, which I assume it is. There's no point in discussing who defeated whom when the proof still exists, right lad?


Considering that debate turned into more of a row you actually won nothing as you consistently made me and rsloan repeat ourselves, so like me he decided to enjoy life rather than argue like yourself.

I should assume that in fact, masturbating to 6 year-olds is a perfectly normal healthy activity for a grown 29 year-old adult and not by any means evidence that he has a psychiatric disorder?


Again you have not met him so you have no right to judge if he is any sort of disorder. That is why specialists meet suspected people with disorders in person dumbass.

Do you have a screenshot of me admitting to masturbating to the screenshots I've taken of the paedophile?


Do you actually have evidence that Rapunzel is a paedo? No, you have something which a user of IMDb has typed on the web.

You on the other hand have literally nothing. Zip, zero, zilch, nada. Now, would you like your dignity back? I think I still have it here somewhere...


Lad, you too have no evidence, I dare you to show them images to IMDb go on I dare you, and see what they say, okay? Your evidence means jacksh*it.

Again, kindly explain how a screenshot of the man admitting to a sexual attraction to children which fits the exact definition of paedophilia, as well as everything else I just mentioned is not credible evidence.


AGAIN, because it is the god damn internet anyone can say anything on here, there are websites devoted to cannibalism which people post on, do people mean what they say? In most cases not, so you have zero evidence.

You're making a mockery of yourself when you should be helping your friend's credibility by providing something that supports him beyond your biased word.


Mate your the one follwing a user on te internet you lost your dignity long ago, as for me being biased? Well if you actually did read my PMs you would see that I state he may have an obsession for children, and that it is not a dangerous thing. Proven wrong again.

Shosh also cares so much in fact that she's helping me offline too,


HAHAHAHAHA, offline in the real world? HAHAHAHA. Yea okay you bring your claims to a court of law or the police, .

From reading your posts and mine, it just looks like you're grasping at straws while I pat you on the head and dismiss everything you say, then you tug on my trouser leg again and I repeat the process.


If I am grasping at straws why have I not stopped already? Ya'see you want this debate to stop so you can go on IMDb without being annoyed, while you yourself annoy other users, oh wait stocking people .

You should also avoid overdoing the laughing emoticons, as it makes you look desperate.


Is that too much? Also just as a side not in nearly every comment you make you have more laugh emoticons, especially in our Connery argument, so is this you saying that you yourself are desperate?

Allll alone every none and then Kevin gets a little lonely... Turrrrn around theres a stalker...

__

Jesus, that's really super... How'd a nitwit like you get so tasteful?

reply

anyone reading this will laugh at you for making yourself look stupid
Well that's true actually, I laugh at him.

Also, random battles suck.

This sig has been deleted by an administrator

reply

Well that's true actually, I laugh at him.


Good to know. Glad there are others that are on the same wave-length as myself.

__

Jesus, that's really super... How'd a nitwit like you get so tasteful?

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

That is officially the weakest argument I have heard so far from anyone. I literally laughed out loud when I read this, and I'm not even joking.


I agree it was a weak statement, but the thing is, is that that it is true, you actually have never seen him masturbate to a child. Owned.

Not at all, it probably doesn't bother me nearly as much repeating my points as it does you because mine actually have substance, so it serves a purpose.


Considering there are more people here against you than there is against me you are the one that lacks substance. Owned.

I wouldn't be the one ending it if you walked away, would I? Christ man, think before you type.


You should think before you, type by the way your getting angry again.

I have countless screenshots and photos of the guy's room, that's evidence. Let's see how many times and how many different ways I can repeat this, and we'll see who gets tired first, shall we?


1:You cant prove that its his room.

2:I have repeated myself far more than you have, and your getting annoyed that I am making you repeat yourself now .

3:I am not in this to prove if I am the ultimate debater, I am in this to help a friend, so if I wanted to stop I could anytime as you are the only person in this debate for personal reasons.

4:Owned.

You just said yourself you were looking at our messages...


You brought the PM thing up dumbass. Owned.

You know the kind of laughter where the blood rushes to your cheeks and you avert your eyes? That kind, so to speak.


Another assumption, so no proof. Owned.

You're enjoying life so much you're still here, trying desperately to debate.


If I was debating my statements would be triple the length that they are, also you are the who is desperate.

Are you calling him a liar, is that what you're saying?


Anyone that can read and has an IQ over 50 can see I am not calling you a liar, I am merely stating that you are a total idiot which it seems people agree with me on that.

They don't wear signs on their forehead stating what they are. The only way to determine it is by questioning them on their sexual attraction to children, and if they admit to it as this man has then their desires fit the exact definition of paedophilia and it's safe to say they have the psychiatric disorder. It's a very strange way to defend someone, claiming they're a liar, don't you think?


I never said he was a liar dumbass, also like I said before this is the internet and you are not qualified to state if he is a paedo, go to university and study in that area then I will agree with you.

So because it's the internet... it doesn't exist? Is that your motto here?


When did I say it does not exist? Assumptions again, .

Despite the fact that I've shown you evidence which stretches beyond the internet, such as photos of the man's room?


Repetition is a common thing with you, You cannot prove its his bedroom and even if it is, its not a crime to put favourite actors on your wall, kid or not, there are people on Youtube who happily show off there wallpapers of Justin Bieber on there wall yet he is under aged. Owned.

Furthermore, why oh why would he admit to masturbating to child models even on the net? If it was simply to troll, the object of trolling is to receive negative attention, yet he seems to go out of his way to avoid that, so what would be the purpose?


He is dragging negative attention, from you, wow you are thick.

I already have, it's not IMDb's responsibility to track a paedophile, their concern is merely enforcing the terms and conditions.


Riiiight... Well without looking at the T&Cs I would expect it to state that talking about paedophilia and anything of a sexual nature is not allowed so that proves that IMDb does not care. Owned.

He has shown photos of his room, his desktop wallpaper which could not have been Googled due to the time frame and context


Okay lets say he did have that as his desktop wallpaper, okay?... So that must mean that it is a crime now for me to go and get a pic of lets say Brooke Shields as a little girl and have it as a desktop wallpaper? No it is not, for all you know dumbass, he went and got a pic and put it has his wallpaper, screenshots then reverts back to his old wallpaper. Owned.

or else why the hell would someone be on a website like that?


Huh duhhhhhhhhhhhh... To troll. .

Who said anything about the law or the police?


Oooooohh scary biscuits, so its a hacker then? Hey while your at it hack my account to. Moron.

Pride? Trying to regain your dignity through persistence? Patience in hoping I'll slip up at some point? All pretty obvious reasons.


Lol? .

In response to what you were trying to say though, why would I want the debate to stop when my purpose for being here is to make people aware of the paedophile's nature?


Making people aware and debating are 2 totally different things, dumbass. Owned.

The human mind fascinates me, I'm especially always interested in how far a man (or woman for that matter) will go to save face or keep their pride and dignity intact.


If that is the case then study yourself as you lost your dignity long ago.

I space mine out mate, that's the difference, and I also laugh at things that are actually... well, funny.


Good to know you found them funny as no one else did . Owned.

^ Which this isn't.


That makes nooo sense, but if what you are trying to say is I am following you and commenting everywhere you go? No obvioulsy not. Oh wait sorry its becuse I am beating you in the debate again there are people here also against you .

I really dont know why I even have commented this long as I stated in my first post that I really had no interest in arguing, I am going to live up to my word,you can reply to this all you want as it now means nothing . Because the thing is, is that people on here are on my side not yours.

Allll alone every now and then you get a little bit lonellllyy... - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_NdBiLlVl8&feature=related

But like I said before, I am always around .

__

Jesus, that's really super... How'd a nitwit like you get so tasteful?

reply

[deleted]

You might wanna specify a bit mate, otherwise you just look like one of those bums in the street that reek of alcohol and talk to themselves, nodding and winking, no one else having a clue what the hell they're going on about.


It is very easy to understand, I feel like I am talking to an immagrant... There are things I stated in my comment about you and you backed all my claims up, take a look go I dare you . Wait maybe you should actually save time to go and masturbate to them screenshots you have of people talking about children, hey maybe you can bring your girlfriend along to .

__

Jesus, that's really super... How'd a nitwit like you get so tasteful?

reply

[deleted]