MovieChat Forums > Fiza (2000) Discussion > This film had great potential to succeed...

This film had great potential to succeed!


the film struck me as highly thoughtful and capable of better if along the way a bolt had not struck khalid reminding him of entertainment value and corrupting an otherwise well-made film. its certainly had much more depth than the average bollywood film, and unlike most of them, is depressing throughout. the characterisation of amaan and fiza is brilliant and something of a landmark in indian cinema. what was poor were the superflous addition of songs like fiza,aankh milaaongi, which served as respites, that however were incongruent with the movement of the story and development of characters. some of the symbolism is refreshing and the acting is brilliant.

it was sad that the film was ripped apart for religious reasons, and was a commercial failure(not a surprise) but another film dealing with terrorism which had much greater technical brilliance yet lacked punch was mission kashmir. to khalid i can only say, try again, and harder, without being too concerned with trying to discordantly input entertainment segments for the sake of it. learn from films like lagaan, and dil chahta hai, how to fuse the entertaiment and art side of film perfectly. of course a classic hollywood example would be what else, The Godfather.

reply

[deleted]

really? i thought it was terrible! even the performances were bad. i only liked sushmita's item number!

reply

[deleted]

the ending was the worst in terms of plot. but the acting was so bad too!

reply

[deleted]

The first half of the film was really interesting, it had a maturity (and i dont mean mature themes!) to it that most bollywood films lack. the second half was kind of a letdown, with the songs and unneccesary 'mere watan' advertising of hrithik's muscles. Even so, if the songs are edited out (barring the first two), i think the film has a much more focused and depressing feel. Satya was another example of a film where the songs damage the overall product. The difference between the two was probably the kind of songs. Satya's songs though unneccesary, fitted in with the overall feel, whereas those in fiza were a blatant attempt to keep the masses in their seats. Its the sad dilemma facing directors in this industry.

reply