The difference is that the monologue is about the word being reclaimed by the people it was used against. By claiming it as our own, we destroy its power over us. This is nothing like the Buddhists reclaiming the swastika (which, by the way, they have a right to do. It was theirs first, after all). This is Jewish people reclaiming the Star of David. It's straight-A students reclaiming "nerd." You say the meaning of a thing should be allowed to change - the monologue isn't about taking C U N T back to its original meaning and stifling its change; it's about allowing it to change to fit the more feminine-accepting world we are making.
And on top of it all, please remember that the V Monologues aren't a statement of purpose for women everywhere or even for feminists everywhere. It's a series of snapshots of women. It celebrates their diversity It doesn't focus on what we already know and see every day, it allows the deepest, most hidden, most controversial things women have to say to be said on stage. This woman wants to reclaim C U N T. And the beauty of feminism is that you don't have to agree with her; you just have to acknowledge her opinion and not compare her to a racist for it.
reply
share