It wasn't even rape... ok it was rape, but not rape rape. Well perhaps it was rape rape, but not rape rape rape.
you're a towel!
peep show?
In other words, if you were in Matt's shoes, you wouldn't like hunt her down to kill her after the police fail to prosecute her for the deed, right, you'll forgive her?
What's consensual sex then?
The greatest trick the Devil has ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist!
Why do you keep asking this question?
It's very odd...?
Sleeper creeper
sharei just watched this for the first time as an adult not a horny teenager, and i realized very very quickly that this is DEFINITELY RAPE.
shareIn the eyes of the law rape is defined as "non-consensual sex with penial insertion."
Hence - it was NOT rape as a woman cannot engage in oenial insertion on a man.
At the most it IS sexual assault.
that's the dumbest shit i ever heard, who's raising idiots like Gandhi2, jeebus
shareYou're right. It IS sexual assault, and very serious sexual assault at that, and can, thus, carry, in theory, a sentence as long and significant as that which is given for 'rape' (i.e. non-consensual sex with a penis or object - by the way, women *can* commit rape, if they were, say, to insert an object without a man's consent into his anus; my apologies for the clumsy way I'm dealing with this very serious topic).
But you're also right to say that *technically* it wasn't rape in this instance, even though the intent was effectively the same as the Mens Rea for actual rape.
You are going on about the law but which law?
Not all countries have the same laws.
In US she would be put on probation with a fine also sex offenders list (this is one area US is way to soft no wonder why people are not happy with it)
UK it can vary with being put on sex offenders list plus could server upto 10 years prison
Rape is an outdated term most of the time sexual assault is used because it covers a broader spectrum and would be easier to charge someone.
"Rape is an outdated term most of the time sexual assault is used because it covers a broader spectrum and would be easier to charge someone"
Deliberately vague language is to The late 10s and 2020s what Dock Martens and flannel was to the early-mid 90s
Definitely rape. She took advantage of him and it emotionally and psychologically impacted him because it broke his challenge and damaged his relationship with his current girlfriend. She also used that rape for monetary gain considering she won the bet.
She should be thrown in jail.
I guess technically you could also arrest her for prostitution.
shareIt's just an unconscious unwilling person being forced to penetrate a woman without consent
But yeah, he didn't REALLY get raped, because WOMEN are NEVER guilty of ANY crime...
We wouldn't want to SHATTER a gender paradigm with TRUTH
We better ATTACK VICTIMS so we can REVERSE paradigms instead of ELIMINATE them...
I thought this was a Whoopi quote.
share