This is from the introduction to the book by Chuck Palahnuik.
"On a plane back to Portland, an airplane attendant leaned close and asked me to tell hum the truth. His theory was the book wasn't really about fighting at all. He insisted it was really about gay men watching another *beep* in public steambaths.
I told him, yeah, what the hell,. And he gave me free drinks for the rest of the flight."
"one reviewer called the book science fiction. Another called it a satire on the Iron John men's movement. Another called it a satire of corporate white-collar world. Some called it horror. No on called it a romance."
Nothing against academic discussion of the book, in fact, I think it's very important. (Appearantly the University of Pennsylvania gave a seminar on the book years ago. I am still waiting to hear somthing like that taking place in Canada)
But unfortunately, no one should come to one conclusion about one thing and think that they are absolutely right. Think about hermeneutic phenomenology, and how lived experiences influence how we perceive things, such as reading or watching Fight CLub.
reply
share