How much nudity is in this? - Bully (2001) Discussion

[–] 10 years ago

[deleted]

There was more than necessary, but since many American movies have much LESS than necessary (i.e, non-nude showers, celebrity "strippers" who keep their underwear on, bras worn during sex), it hardly seems worth complaining about.

Modern-day Hollywood has cornered the market on G and PG "family" films and also slightly racier PG-13 "teen films". Next door in the San Fernando Valley is by far the world's biggest XXX porn industry (where the biggest seller by far is "barely legal" porn). But it's a realistic R or NC-17 presentation of sex that gets everyone's hackles up. Go figure.

reply

[–] kingbishop 10 years ago

Miner, Phillips and Stahl are totally nude throughout most of the movie.

reply

[–] jawsfan007 10 years ago

There are random scens on Rachel Miner Naked for no reason.

Shes hot, but they make it seem like Lisa was a nudist when she was in her bedroom alone. Bijou Phillips dresses pretty trashy and we see all of her as well.

reply

[–] Seth_Rogue_One 8 years ago

they make it seem like Lisa was a nudist when she was in her bedroom alone

Nudists like they get naked in public, and alot of people enjoy being naked when they are alone

That said I do agree that alot of them were unecessary but I'm not gonna complain too much about that lol

I'm gonna refuse you an offer you can't make

reply

[–] MrsMonroe74 9 years ago

too much

___________________
he left u NAKED in a DITCH!

reply

[–] 9 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Seth_Rogue_One 8 years ago

Unless you watched some edited version there is TONS of nudity in here, definitly not for children or for people sensitive towards graphic nudity

I'm gonna refuse you an offer you can't make

reply

[–] bossdog677 8 years ago

You should be asking how often do people have clothes on

reply

[–] pfarnell 8 years ago

I don't even remember so much nudity, did not pay much attention. There is really no one's body there I really want to see raw, or doing any act I much want to see.

I was actually on it for the article.

reply

[–] againstglobalism 7 years ago

There's quite a bit of nudity. But whenever you're watching a Larry Clark film...that's to be expected. If you're familiar with Larry Clark's style, than it should come as no surprise. I remember the first time I showed this movie to my friends, halfway into the film, one of my friends asked me..."Hey, is this a porno film?" - That just cracked me up, due to how dead serious they were with the question. I had to explain to them..."No, this is an actual movie." But yeah, this movie definitely contains some heavy sexual content. But honestly, I think Clark's Ken Park is even more graphic, to a certain extent.

reply