"We do not see Snape asking Voldemort to spare Lily, but if he intended to kill her anyway, he would not have asked her to step aside."
My point was that Snape asking Voldy to spare Lily had nothing to do with the reason Voldy attempted to spare lily. We know Snape did ask from both the memories and the book's ending discussion between Harry and Tom Riddle, as Harry called him. However, in the Voldy memory of the scene andhow he responded to Harry's comment about it in the end of the DH book, it doesn't seem as if the request by Snape played any part in his decision.
Now the difference between Lily's sacrifice and James' sacrifice was important. James attacked James and was given no chance to step aside. He was merely killed. That he offered Lily the chance was what was important. Apparently, when he got there, he was in a prideful mood and just didn't feel like killing someone who wasn't attacking him until she refused to heed him. Then she just killed her rather than spare her.
"Both Voldemort and Dumbledore said that that was "ancient magic", so it surely have happened sometime in the past."
Yet Harry was stated to have been the first person to have survived the AK curse in that specific way. I would simply refer to this as a plot hole for how Dumbledore and Voldy understood ancient magic of sacrificial protection, but with that, Voldy still didn't truly understand it as he used Harry's blood to resurrect himself, thus taking in that very ancient magic into himself that was protecting Harry from him.
Bob
reply
share