MovieChat Forums > Paradise Lost 2: Revelations (2001) Discussion > Can someone spoil this special for me?

Can someone spoil this special for me?

posted 17 years ago by yoncenator
15 replies | jump to latest

Own the first one, would love to have a synopsis of the second w/ all secrets revealed! Thank you in advance.

Did you tell LUKE..? Is THAT who you could tell??

[–] zodalarious 17 years ago

w/ all secrets revealed!

The fact that it's used as a basis for the misinformation disseminated by a large number of supporters?

Then again, that's hardly a secret.

Oh and the three are still guilty. Sadly, Echols doesn't die in the end.

[–] yoncenator 17 years ago

I didn't ask for your opinion but thanks anyways for including it. I think I'll ignore it. Can anyone give me more than 'what DOESN'T happen at the end of this special' synopses? Thanks.

Did you tell LUKE..? Is THAT who you could tell??

[–] Simmy41 17 years ago

Try looking it up on Wiki

If White America Told The Truth For One Day It's World Would Fall Apart

[–] yoncenator 17 years ago

This is what 'Wiki' says

The three boys convicted in the first film are all tested and do not match the alleged "bite marks" on the victim. The support groups for Echols want Byers to have his bitemark compared to the one on the photo, but Byers has had false teeth since four years after his son's murder. Byers gave the Defense copies of his dental records and they didn't match the "bite marks" either. Byers takes a polygraph to prove his innocence but is on a variety of medication while taking it, including Xanax and Haldol; he passes the test.

Really is that it??

Did you tell LUKE..? Is THAT who you could tell??

[–] mojo-71 17 years ago

There were no bitemarks, even according to the bulk of the Defense witnesses.

[–] pfk505 16 years ago

You forgot "Byers sings more songs, Byers rants at his wife's grave site and Byers lights a campfire on mock graves of the wm3"

Easily the highlights of the movie for me.

[–] deathwax 16 years ago

what the hell was going on with those "graves"? was that an excuse for byers to visit the scene of the crime again? :D

say what you want, but MAN that cat can SING!!!!

and what a luxurious beard.

[–] rottinghotty 14 years ago

the cameras were banned from court, so they filmed alot of Byers and support groups outside the courts

the support group was filmed in meetings and outside court and also talking to Damian, hosting a website where people can ask him questions online

it attempted to make Byers look guilty (even though i highly doubt he is), Byers raved and ranted alot, he took a polygraph while under the influence of many prescription drugs for depression, anxiety and also mentioned he had a brain tumor

a profiler and lawyer studied the evidence and claimed that the 'cuts' on one of the victims faces was actually a bite mark and so dental impressions of the incarcerated men were taken and not a match

the support group challenged Byers to give his dental impression too and he displayed his dentures and said his teeth were removed, he also states in a different scene they were knocked out in a fight, while others claim he said he had them surgically removed or that the rotted out from prescription drugs he was on, (either way i read somewhere he did give his old dental x rays for comparison and they were not a match)

they also had alot of flashbacks to the previous film

the film is on youtube by the way, just be aware parts 18 and 19 have no sound (the uploader claimed youtube removed the sound but i suspect he did to try and get subscribers to his account)

cheers,

you can't spell slaughter without laughter

[–] mojo-71 14 years ago

a profiler and lawyer studied the evidence and claimed that the 'cuts' on one of the victims faces was actually a bite mark

A "profiler" (Brent Turvey) looked at a photograph and said "Well,... at least we got bitemarks."

As Judge Burnett pointed out, even the bulk of the Defense witnesses testified that they couldn't say it was a bitemark with any degree of certainty.

http://wm3hoax.downonthefarm.org/board/index.php

[–] rottinghotty 14 years ago

semantics...

just answering the posters question, not saying i know the case obsessively or that what was said is gospel.

if you are what you eat, i could be you by tomorrow

[–] mojo-71 14 years ago

semantics...

No, you were just wrong.

just answering the posters question, not saying i know the case obsessively or that what was said is gospel.

Since you clearly didn't know what was said, you aren't really in a position to answer the posters question, are you?

Glad I coud help you out again.

You're welcome BTW.

http://wm3hoax.downonthefarm.org/board/index.php

[–] rottinghotty 14 years ago

like i said, i'm not claiming to be the know all of anything

i just gave a brief overview of what i saw and also recommended the OP watch the film and see for themselves

i am in a position to answer since i did watch the film but of course i don't have the exact knowledge you do of the case

i am actually very impressed with your passion towards the whole case and even though i don't always agree with the things you say, i wish i had the time and patience to go over the transcripts in the detail you have and maybe i will one day since i'm fascinated by the case too

i can imagine you get fed up with a lot of people coming on the boards and arguing when they are not in possession of all the facts but a little tact can go along way, there is no need to be rude to me, i have done nothing to warrant that

i have seen from your posting history you can back up your arguments with facts but tend to also attack irrelevant comments, i hope that if you do reply that we can maybe talk about the case, as i would be interested to hear about it from someone so knowledgeable.

if you are what you eat, i could be you by tomorrow

[–] mojo-71 14 years ago

I can't add anything I haven't already added a dozen times, but I'll certainly answer any questions I can.

http://wm3hoax.downonthefarm.org/board/index.php

[–] whatever94401 14 years ago

Rotting, what are you doing?

[–] mojo-71 14 years ago

Poor whatever.....

It's almost as if folks just aren't interested in your opinion on.... well on ANYTHING.

http://wm3hoax.downonthefarm.org/board/index.php