The message, and the title, do not fit the story

Your reply has nothing to do with my post except a rant about the vagueness of normality. Normal is a normal curve. A standard deviation. It's actually entirely scientific. Not subjective. She does not behave normally, nor does she possess a normal control of her own emotions. That's what it means. And it's not the point of my post. I could switch out "not normal" with "f-d up" and my point would be the same.

My point was the title is called "Prozac Nation". This term is used disparagingly in society to describe over-medication, and a society that is convinced to take drugs that either do not help, or do further harm. In the film itself it concludes with a blurb about the number of people in America on Prozac, as if that number has any relevance to the film. The title is a contradiction, or at least entirely irrelevant to the story. The story is not about a Prozac Nation, nor is it a story about a person within a Prozac Nation, it's about someone who positively responded to medication. That would be a "Problem-Solving Nation".

Further the bit of text at the end of the film was in the style of many films that attempt to make a deeper point about the subject that was presented. A film that portrays the negative aspects of war might then conclude with some text about the casualties overall, and what impact the war had. Thus enhancing the emotional intensity of the conclusion. However in this film, the concluding text is about a bunch of people we never met, and an issue that was never presented in the film. The contrary, the whole story was about a woman who responded well to drugs.

If this isn't descriptive enough for you, I suggest you go back to school.

[deleted]