America's first serial killer??
A commentator says this. That must be wrong.
What you see is not necessarily what you get,
Not trying is dying, keep trying unto death....
[deleted]
Ed Gein was not a serial killer, he was not a mass murderer & he was not a spree killer.
You have to kill 3 people or more to be classified as one of those types of killers. Ed Gein "only" murdered 2 women.
Ed Gein wasn't a serial killer, just a one or two time killer.
America's first documented serial killer was Carl Panzram, there's also a movie about him starring James Woods, I suggest you see it, good movie.
write this down
E M E T I B
you got that? now reverse it
Carl Panzram?
Wrong.
Try H.H. Holmes a.k.a. Herman Mudgett.
________________________________
remakes? re-imagining? redundant
I thought America's first serial killer was the British..
They killed the Indians you know?
I guess we have to differentiate between America and the USA.
Some of the earliest serial killer in the USA have got to be Billy the Kid and Jesse James although they might be considered Spree Killers.
"I thought America's first serial killer was the British..
They killed the Indians you know?"
As did the French, Spannish and guess who? Good old Uncle Sam. Read up on the Sand Creek Massacre, the entire Indian Wars, the American Rebels in the war of Independence before you make such silly remarks.
History is not as clean cut as some would like it.
And personally I would think the American Continent had it's fair share of serial killers before Columbus (who also could be classed as a serial killer...he killed and the 'indians' also) and other Europeans arrived to plunder the place.
"Nothings gonna change my world!"
[deleted]
He only admitted to two but there is other factors that lead many to believe he may have two to four other deaths added to that tally.
share