My memory of the film is a little hazy, so feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
Was the prostitute having/ going to have sex with the dwarf puppet in the beginning (the prostitute thought the dwarf was coming after her and told the train conductor about a killer dwarf)
As is my understanding, the prostitute is going to have sex with Lorenzo, the real killer. He isn't up to it (refuses to get out of bed) and tells the prostitute to leave. When she discovers the killer's newspaper clippings, she assumes the client (who she never gets a proper look at) was "the dwarf", Vincenzo (the original suspect for the murders, not the puppet).
Later we learn Vincenzo - a writer of violent crime novels - was actually innocent, and was framed by the young Lorenzo for the murder of Giacomo's mother in 1983 (the first victim?).
Also, how come the DNA under the 2nd victim's nails was not brought up again in the film?
I think it is. Chief Inspector Manni and his team (the real cops; not Giacomo and Moretti) use the DNA to identify and eventually track down Lorenzo, which is how they manage to arrive at the house at the end of the film. That is one of the main points of the film; how the different crime solving techniques of Moretti (old school) and Manni (new school) are contrasted. This is an idea Argento takes further in his next film The Card Player, where he attempts to update the conventions of the giallo with modern (21st century) technology and CSI style forensics.
I guess it's kind of confusing since most of Manni's dialogue about modern police procedures beating out Moretti out-dated detective work is spoken during the closing credits.
how come after the 1st 2 murders (the prostitute, then her friend) the "cat" was the next victim?
I can't help you with the order of the killings without first re-watching the film, but I'm sure someone with more insight will get around to it eventually.
reply
share