MovieChat Forums > The Amanda Show (1999) Discussion > Moody's Point - wrong mood + misses the ...

Moody's Point - wrong mood + misses the point


Although I've come to appreciate Amanda Bynes' talent and general likeability in the movies She's The Man and Hairspray, I dismissed The Amanda Show as way too broadly acted and juvenile in it's humour, much like Lizzie McGuire, That's So Raven, and all those other tween-girl shows which I've channel surfed quickly away from.

Recently I came across positive comments about one recurring segment called Moody's Point, which sounded interesting - intended as a spoof of teen soaps like Dawson's Creek. That actually has the potential to be funny (although I don't dislike the Creek). So I thought I'd give The Amanda Show another chance. Luckily all of Moody's Point can be found on youtube.

Unfortunately, I was disappointed. Like many so-called spoofs, Moody's Point fails to address (and mock) the actual conventions of the genre or specific show/whatever it's supposed to be mocking. Instead of being a clever satire, the writers rely on easy gross-out gags and slapstick. They don't even bother to recreate famous moments from Dawson's Creek and put their own (hopefully humourous) spin on them. With the exception of the opening credit sequence. It seems clear to me that the writers/producers aren't very familiar with Dawson's Creek, and probably never watched an episode all the way through. I guess they never got past those opening credits.

The "characters" on Moody's Point are ciphers, not clearly defined or recognizable archetypes. Meanwhile, the storyline... emergency surgeries/heart transplants, babies switched at birth/mysterious parentage ... all of these things are staples of daytime soaps for housewives. Not primetime teen dramas.

With all the silly hospital hijinks and medical mix-ups on Moody's Point, I figure The Amanda Showrunners were inspired more by that Muppet Show sketch "Veterinarian's Hospital" (no doubt a staple of their childhood), moreso than Dawson's Creek or any other teen soaps.

In any case, The Muppet Show was much funnier, Moody's Point was a waste of a good idea, and I still don't like The Amanda Show. Oh, she deserves her own show, but with better writers.... and better supporting actors. The rest of the Moody's Point cast was horrible. Amanda's the only one who realized that she should play her character earnestly and seriously, in order to best capture that teen angst mood. The other actors were so over-the-top with their exaggerated screaming and crying, they belonged in a spoof of I Love Lucy instead. (I realize that Amanda's a fan of Lucille Ball, but, whatever, I hate Lucy.)

At least Amanda seems to understand that you don't need to bleat and bray and generally make an ass of yourself in order to be funny. The best comedians are equally good at drama/tragedy and can convey pathos. Bill Murray, for instance, or Charlie Chaplin. And (while I'm not saying she's the next Chaplin!) I thought I saw a bit of that in Amanda's performance, especially the scenes involving meeting her birth parents/saying goodbye to her old life. Glad Amanda Bynes said goodbye to this show, and hope she keeps moving on to bigger and better things.

reply

I agree, I hated Moody's Point as a child because it always took up a large portion of the episode and like you said, it's supposed to be a spoof but it doesn't spoof anything very clearly.

I'm Tom Hanks and I want you in my bed.

reply

Wow.

reply

I agree with the views on Moody's Point. But I think the show itself is quite underrated. It even pre-dates Tim and Eric with some of its absurdity and anti-comedy.

reply

a swing and a miss

Abed doesnt need realityAbed is a magical elf-like manWho makes us all more magicalBy being near us

reply

[deleted]

You don't get it, so it's terrible? Luckily an opinion is not a fact. The show wasn't marketed towards the crowd that actually watched Dawson's Creek, but rather their younger siblings. Obviously it was never going to recreate the Creek scene-by-scene.

P.S. The actors acted the way they were written and directed to. If you don't like their delivery, take it up with the showrunners (I'm sure Dan Schneider, with his string of INCREDIBLY SUCCESSFUL television programming, would just love to hear what you think he did so wrong.)

reply

how do i contact Dan? Been trying to but he is too busy. Any number i can reach him @?

reply

I thought Moody's point was downright hilarious. It wasn't a dedicated Creek spoof though

 I apologize for any spelling/grammar mistakes. I'm on my phone 90% of the time.

reply

[deleted]

Schneider was born in '66 so it is likely possible he watched the muppet show growing up and yes moodys point was dull honest.

reply

I am actually glad about Moody's Point as I cannot stand 99.9% of the 1990s culture, which basically sanitized everything.

And you can say that Moody's Point was too slow paced but I felt the same way about Dawson's Creek.

While Moody's Point started out well, they ended up doing very stupid things towards the end of the "series" which only uses crude humour.

It would have been a little better if Moody's Point was spun off, and they did edit a few clips into a full length pilot episode. That was interesting but they still never finished it. I doubt that they could have made any more meaningful episodes. The Amanda Show was running out of ideas during Season 3 and so they added Moody's Point but even Moody's Point obviously started to run out of ideas.

The closest thing we have to a resolution of Moody's Point is that the toe of Moody's fat her ended up with Moody's mother. ... of course we then learn that Moody Fallon isn't really Moody Fallon.

I was expecting Penelope Taynt's parents to appear when they opened the door. I assume they are Mr. Gullible and Ms. De Boat?

______
 = 
For More Information, Click On My Profile.
http://in-correct.blogspot.com/

reply

The two-part sketch with Moody's dad's toe was the best of all of them. It was subsequently edited into one full episode. Too bad we didn't know who the real Moody was.

reply