Movie is true story


I'm from Croatia and is true. The movie is just telling a 1/4 of realy story. War was end in 1994-1995. It was terble.

reply

[deleted]

You should be ashame of yourself spreading chetnik propaganda on this site especially on the day Vukovar was occupied 13 years ago.
There´s only one true story...Serbs attacking Croats in Vukovar,Croatia in the late summer and during the whole autumn of 1991.
Serbs destroyed the city killing over 3000 civilians. They also butchered wounded POWs from the Vukovar hospital. Three serbian war officials from the period have been indicted for those crimes at the International Tribunal at the Hague. At the moment a trial is also underway in Belgrade, Serbia for the killings in the Vukovar hospital meaning serbian public has finally realised what happend there 13 years ago. Furthermore, there are many Serbs who were killed in Vukovar by their own people just because they didn´t want to desert the town were they peacefully lived among Croatians for centuries..
Death came from Belgrade and you know it boris!

reply

[deleted]

Serbs didn't let us have our own country, THEY attacked US because of the sick great serbia idea!!!! if you don't believe that, then how come the war ended when the serbs withdrew? how come the croats didn't continue their "cleansing"? it's because we didn't want a war! we wanted to seperate peacefully, like the chech and slovaks. don't go lying now boris, admit it. as much as i am ashamed of ustashas, you should be ashamed of chetniks, who weren't that different from hitler as well. we should all do what they couldn't, move on peacefully.

reply

Serbs didn't let us have our own country, THEY attacked US because of the sick great serbia idea"

If Serbs wanted great Serbia, then why they continued to call their country Yugoslavia, even after war? Shouldn't they call it great Serbia (including: Serbia, Montenegro, Kosovo and Vojvodina) instead of Yugoslavia? Answer is NO. Serbs didn't want great Serbia. Serbs wanted Yugoslavia. It's big difference.




"if you don't believe that, then how come the war ended when the serbs withdrew? how come the croats didn't continue their "cleansing"?"

It's because Croats cleaned everything (remember Flash and Storm). After these two military operations Serbs were banished from Croatia, and they are still in exile.




"we didn't want a war! we wanted to seperate peacefully"

Then why you excluded Serbs from Statute, after proclaiming Croatian State, and took nazi symbols from WW2 as national symbols?

reply


Then why you excluded Serbs from Statute, after proclaiming Croatian State, and took nazi symbols from WW2 as national symbols?

what nazi symbols? wtf are you talking about!? there are national symbols, and then there are nationalist symbols, and ustashas' symbols are not national. and not all croats are serb-hating criminals, but you srpsko sarajevo, just can't get over that, and your nickname says it the best. can't stop living in the past, can you?

reply

"nazi symbols from WW2 as national symbols?"- what nazi simbols, there are none.
We didn`t want war. Read our history. We were always fighting for existance, since 7th century. From the time we existed everyone wanted our land and sea, and rule us. Austrians, Germans, Talians(mletci, long time ago) and Serbians.
Serbians attacked, we defrfended our selfs. It`s always been that way. And then in the end we end up as a bad guys. I don`t know the details,I`m jung, and i`m not judging anyone, but i can`t say that some croatian soldiers didn`t do same things as serbian soldiers. But I also know that there were some serbian people who didn`t want that war. There was a war, now it`s over. And we are glad. And now we`re all in good relations.

A long, long time ago I can still remember how that music used to make me smile...

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

As a Macedonian you should know history better than that. More than 150 years ago Jelacic had to decide which ocupators were more threatening Croatia, he tried to chose between two evils, Austrian empire and Hungarian supremacy in Croatia that lasted eight centuries. Did he chose well? Noone knows. Today both Austria and Hungary are great friends with each other and with Croatia and I hope this part of history won't be reopened, unless someone has really bad plans trying to destroy peace in this Mid-European region. (One would expect someone from Macedonia, surrounded by at least five countries that ruled or try to conquer your country, to understand this better than anyone. You must know that Hungarians didn't plan to let Croatia free if they won!)

In WW1 Croatia was part of Austro-Hungarian enmpire, so Croatian people were mobilised, noone asked them who they want to fight for (or do they at all). Remember, or learn if you still don't know, that in XIX century Croats didn't use their name for nationalist movements, they called themselves Ilirs, to avoid suspicion and fear among neighbours, mostly Serbs, finding them potentially best friends. Also in XIX century Yugoslavian Academy of Science and Art was founded in Zagreb, not Croatian, and still in both Yugoslavias (1918-1991) there was no Croatian Academy, while Serbs had their Serbian, Slovenians their Slovenian academy etc. So who wanted to build and keep Yugoslavia most? But when it became unbearable (due to Milosevic politics) this idea was broken.

And one remark about WW2. Those terrorist group called ustashe were trained by Mussolini for one reason, the same as any terrorists throughout history exist. And when Nazis occupied Croatia, no real Croatian politican participated the government, it was proclaimed by German and Italian servants. They killed people as all terrorists do, yes, killed more Serbs than Croats, but they were nothing more than quisling agents of nazis.

And I'm sorry for anybody killed in this or any war. Criminals ar criminals everywhere, in Sweden or in Rwanda, just war gives them better opportunites. No country, your or mine, is criminalfree.

reply

1. Jelacic was a 19th century NOBLEMAN, which means he was fighting for his own cause. Hungary and Croatia were NOT in war because none of these countries existed then, they were both a part of Habsburg Empire, and didn't have their own armies. Jelacic led his own troops, against Hungarian rebels against the Habsburg Emperor, and not Croatians.

2. We didn't join up in Germans in any of the two World Wars cause, again, we didn't exist as an independent country.
Before WW1 we were a part of Habsburg Empire, alongside many other now independent countries, and the ONLY person who was deciding about any alliances was the Emperor. Austrian Emperor.
Before WW2 we were a part of Yugoslavia, which was overran by the Nazis. When the country was under German and Italians, the ocupators decided to create a fascist puppet-state of Croatia, and put the Ustashe on "power", Croatian fascist stationed in Mussollini's Italy until then.
(BTW, since you're a Macedonian, I'll mention that Ustashe cooperated with VMRO, so, by calling all Croatians fascists because of the Ustashe, you're in a way calling yourself a fascisct too.)

3. About the military compounds - you said it yourself:
YUGOSLAVIAN military compounds in CROATIA.
What would you think about Albanians having military camps in Skopje?
Maybe, in some cases. the war still hadn't started before first conflicts began, but later army broke out of these compounds and attacked the cities.
If had no intentions of doing that they would just leave.
The problems was that JNA didn't recognize Croatian independency.

4. It doesn't take two sides to start a war.

5. "...and don't start telling me that you wanted peace, when you clearly never wanted it."

We always wanted peace, so did the Croatia Serbs.
It's only those who don't have to go to war themselves, or see there children go, WANT war.
And if you meant Croatian politicians...well, you can never really tell what goes on in someone's mind, and what would happen if Milosevic didn't grab the chance.
But I really doubt that the serbs would be ethnically cleansed, although it happende at some degree durignthe war (AT SOME DEGREE! I saw someone saying that Croatia is clean of Serbs - croatian leading party is in COALITION with a serbian one, so they are officially a part of croatian government).
Why I don't believe it would happen?
Cause there would be no war to "hide" or "legitimize" it (by "legitimize" I mean closing an eye for a grater cause, as a way to peace).

reply

This last reply was realy systematic. But that made me read again the post our Macedonian friend had sent, and I found some details that I've missed before.

I didn't notice that soldier was killed BEFORE the war started. There were NO attacks on Yugoslav soldiers before the war (well, off course, it depends what does someone consider about the real date the war began).

Do you know how many young people died in the army during 50's, 60's, 70's and 80's? Why would year 1990 be any different? Or maybe it happened only to Croats, and Macedonians didn't have strange "accidents"? Those young people were sent home in metal, sealed coffins so noone could ever see how they looked like, and check if they really "fell from the train while traveling home" or some other usual official explanation. From time to time, however, some witnesses dared to whisper that the soldiers had been either shot or hanged themselves. But these thing were a taboo as well as partisan crimes.

The war is a dirty thing. I don't know any nation that doesn't want peace. As Mor_Oghma wrote, both Croats and Croatia Serbs wanted peace. But you underestimate the power of leaders and media. When people repeatedly hear in how great danger they are, they start behaving irrationaly. If today, while all that mass hysteria about avian flu spreads worldwide, someone suggested a war against (e.g.) Thailand because they endanger the world by doing nothing to prevent it so we might all die if (due to their indolence) a pandemia occurs - don't you think he would have followers? Then if they find enough less educated people in isolated areas who would form an army, or at least "paramilitar forces"...?

And if someone is so eloquent and convincing leader and a demagogue as Milosevic... The rest is (a tragic) history.

reply

First SARAJEVO is capital City of Bosnia and your name said everything.
"Serbian Sarajevo" Ha, ha, ha it is not and never will be .

Secondly, Why are you playing realy strange game?

We all know why you caling your self Yugoslavia insted of Srbija.
Yugoslavija was thanks to CROAT TITO respectful country in the world.
You are hiding behind her name because when you say SRBIJA every one
remember Srebrenica, Sarajevo,Manjaca, Vukovar,Dubrovnik, Kosovo... And every one know that word Serbia is simbol for DEVIL, Brutality and Crime. Serb are hiding behind Yugoslavia, something that does not exist any more.

I am realy mad that Serbs even spoiled our memories because Yugoslavija
was a great country to live in. My Yugoslavija is in me. You are Beogradski
Pasaluk,you do not have even Kosovo nor Crnu Goru.

reply

Just a side note... Why is your nickname "Sarajevo is Serbian?". This kind of behavioral pattern is what brought to these wars in the first place. It is sad you haven't learned anything from this movie.

reply

well said, dri9!! i'm croatian and i'm ashamed of the ustasha myself. just a few months ago i was verbally attacked by a serb online who called me an ustasha because i posted the croatian flag up on my space profile. he apologized eventually and i told him the exacty same thing you posted. i'm happy that croatia is now independent, but both sides are to blame for the atrocities.

reply

[deleted]

Boris t: If you can't speak my language properly, don't post on these MBs, your post is a load of nonsense - the fact is that all sides were equally to blame during that period, all did equally horrible things to the others, and all deserved exactly what they got which is the contempt of the rest of the world.

George... don't do that!

reply

the fact is that all sides were equally to blame during that period


Can you please define "that period"? I don't want to waste my time or forum's space and find out that we don't talk about same thing. I promise to reply after your answer.

BTW I like beliefs in your personal page.

reply

Hahahaha.... Chetnik propaganda? Is that something President Truman overlooked in 1948. when he awarded a star to Chetnik General D. Mihailovic for saving 500 lifes of American pilots in the WWII?

How about recent developments in Croatia: a Serb, 81 years old, slaugthered like a lamb in his house? Or an old Serbian woman, strangled with a wire - by her own Croatian neighbor?

People, if you'd like to get more info on bloodshed in the former Yugoslavia read books, e.g. read what General Michael Rose wrote in his book " Fighting for Peace"! Croatians were the "untouchables" from 1991 until recently, they sang Danke Deutchland (literally) and got all the help from Germans (AGAIN) - oh, how history repeats itself...

For a time being, movies like H. Flowers will be made, but - independent movies will never portray Croats as victims - they have always faught on the agressor's side, they killed king of Yugoslavia because he was a Serb, they built concentration camps (Jasenovac and Gradiska) for Jews and Serbs, destroyed over 40 thousand Serbian children in WWII, committed genocide against 300 thousand Serbs in 1995, and now would like to be victims of so called "agression"? And how do you become an agressor in your own house?

To see Croatian Army in their full power and "glory", visit a few web sites:

http://www.pavelicpapers.com/
http://motlc.wiesenthal.com/pages/t081/t08100.html
http://www.arhivrs.org/e_jasenovac2.asp

The movie itself, eh... I rather watch Van Helsing - accurate and real as Harrison's Flowers, but with better special effects...

reply

Croats indeed sang that odious "Danke Deutschland", but yes, in 1991., when Germany appeared to be among rare nations that tried to do something to stop slaughters, and we all know who was slaughtering then, but you very carefully avoid crimes in that year. In 1991. it was not Germany that occupied one third of Croatian land after unsuccesful attempt to conquer Slovenia, following occupation of Bosnia...

Imagine Swedish minority in Finland suddenly deciding to separate, blocking main roads and railway, killing most of their neighbours after torturing them the way our readers don't want to know (unless horror fans), imprisoning some in concentration camps and leting some of the lucky ones as refugees leave their homes. Imagine than this minority asking help from their main nation, Sweden, and imagine Swedish army attack Finland, join these rebels and continue killing civilians, concealing the massacres by throwing bodies in wells, rivers, or big, hidden unmarked graves. Can you imagine it in Finland? Of course not, neither can I. But it happened in Croatia in 1990 and 1991.

Yes, Croatia has her share of mistakes and crimes. Jasenovac is a tragic black spot in it's history - though formed and led by government that was never elected or confirmed by Croatian nation, it was set by nazi occupants. And this self-proclaimed government was a bunch of terrorists trained by Mussolini's fascists, and they were responsible for murdering Serbian king as any other terrorist would do (like Serbian terrorist Gavrilo Princip killed Austrian archduke Franz Ferdinand in organisation of Serbian kingdom, and therefore still gloryfied by Serbs).

But even not completely responsible for WWII crimes, Croats can't avoid the fact they were organized and commited in Croatia while some kind of Croation government ruled the country. Yet, it's a twisted logic when someone says that it means a nation that once made crimes always does the same. If Jews were victims in WWII it doesn't mean they were always victims - look their relation to neighbours, let alone Palestinians. Or what about Vietnam concerning their war against Americans and later their adventure in Cambodia?

And better don't mention Draza Mihailovic. I've always believed Truman was a great and honest man. So, either he was wrong informed, or this medail was a defiance against communist regime in Yugoslavia. Personaly, if I were Serb, I would hide a fact that this star has been awarded by a nation that still leads some kind of war in Afghanistan, occupies and bombs Iraq, threatens Iran and some other countries, decides which nations can get freedom and which must stay occupied (Palestinians, Kurds...), and after all, nation that bombed your own country only few years ago, and enabled separation of your nation's cradle Kosovo...

(Editing was just correcting mistakes in typing)

reply

[deleted]

And all the Serbs were not chetniks as they are not today either. But there is a strange manner that people - and that includes even politicians, who are supposed to understand things better - simplify things in history. Nations have symbols attached and can't get rid of it. All Russians are Reds, all Iranians moslem terrorists, all Italians members of maffia, all German nazis, all Jews crooks... So, in this world order all Croats are ustashas and all Serbs are chetniks. This is absurd, but this is what people believe. Most Croats didn't want and didn't even know the reality about Jasenovac till 1945. Most Serbs didn't participate and didn't even know about Srebrenica in 1995. But the world doesn't care since Croats and Serbs have their seals on their foreheads.

reply

[deleted]

From reading all the post on this bord i can see why there can never be peace in yugoslavia. u people cant even be on the same website without fighting.

reply

That is why Yugoslavia ceased to exist. It was impossible to be saved, and if the world realized that in time (and not do everything to prevent its breakup instead) most of the tragic events could have been avoided.

But now, living in their own countries, these nations, though not liking each other very much, and still not trusting each other either, have no more excuses to keep on fighting or threading their neighbours.

reply

The killing hasnt stopped. Bosnia which was once peaceful multicultural country has become a place of hate since serber's attempts of ethinic cleansing. In kosovo before the war the albainians were willing to live in peace with the serb minority but since the war are doing what the serbs did to them raping and killing all the unfavourable ethnic minorities

reply

Bosnia and Kosovo are two very different problems.

Bosnia was considered to be a "little Yugoslavia" because of it mixed population and language that is something between Croatian and Serbian. But unlike Serbia and Montenegro that were independent countries before WWI and unlike Croatia who had a certain level of authonomy in Austro-Hungarian Empire Bosnia had no tradition of statehood; also, unlike Slovenians and Macedonians that didn't have countries, but were nations with its history, language, traditions, Bosnia was a political creation made in 1870's when Austria won it from Turks. The Moslem or Bosnian nation didn't exist at all, population was composed of catholic Croats, orthodox Serbs, and Croats and Serbes that accepted Islam during many centuries of Turkish occupation. Only after WWII communists officialy recognized new nation called Moslems, and the main reason was to diminish both Croats and Serbs as two leading nations in Yugoslavia, and the goal was to wipe away all nations and form a new one, Yugoslav, the way USSR was trying to form a Soviet nation. Bosnia was left in administrative boundaries that had no historical reasons or tradition, and that is the main reason it can't operate as a normal country. For example, in SW part there are regions with bigger percentage of Croatian population than anywhere in Croatia (and this is not an outcome of war and ethnic cleaning, these are numbers from years before war). But Europe was too afraid of changing any borders, so they are still the same way Austrian empire had made them for their purposes, and not the way any of its nations wanted or decided. And being a "little Yugoslavia" it can be expected to have a Yugoslavian destiny in the end.

Kosovo was the most undeveloped and poor region in Yugoslavia. The main reason was the extreme growth of Moslem Albanian population, that became the majority in a region that was always Serbian, it was a craddle of their nation, state and religion. This Albanian population was so poor that all other federal units had to send money month after month, year after year, and this money was never invested in something that could help Kosovo develop, instead it was used only to make better life for its population and enable them to have even more children. Western federal units, mostly Slovenia which was rather rich industrialized state, became unsatisfied, but firm hand of Communist party forced them to give away a great deal of money they earned. Serbs were also unhappy becoming a minority. First conflicts (raping, murders, burned houses) began 10 years before war in Slovenia and Croatia, and after a few years of military made peace again appeared in late 80's. That's when Milosevic got his chance due to Serbian frustrations on Kosovo, and the crash of Yugoslavia became obvious and inevitable.

Though Albanians on Kosovo had been exposed to Serbian terror, they are far from being innocent (as you can understand from above), and what can be understood even better when you consider problems they caused in Macedonia.

reply

"Though Albanians on Kosovo had been exposed to Serbian terror, they are far from being innocent (as you can understand from above), and what can be understood even better when you consider problems they caused in Macedonia."

przgzr, you should quit dealing with politics and history and stick to movies. Same goes for most of you that posted on this thread. As a Kosovar Albanian, I personally resent your comment on being 'far from innocent!' I also hate when people say 'oh well, there was a war and everyone was to blame.' This was a nasty war with a lot of parties involved, even more then ethnicities. Some are 'far from innocent' others even 'further' but based on the results, i.e. the number of killed, raped, tortured and expelled one can quite easily see that some were more 'successful' then others! Or maybe they were just better prepared and more keen on solving the problems by violent, primitive, inhumane means!?

To go back to the movie, I watched it last night on HTV2 and I was pleasantly surprised. The story was good and one could see that the production crew went that 'extra mile' to bring this movie as close to reality as possible. I had heard about Harrison's Flowers before, but I am quite disappointed with some previous movies and TV shows on the war in ex-YU where they don't care about the 'details' like flags, languages, locations etc. I agree with that one comment that casting Andie MacDowell was probably not the best idea (she was SO out of there) but the movie was worth watching.

Greetings from soon-to-be-independent Kosovo!

reply

I wish you good luck, As a Croat I know what is it like to be in your position. However, I never (read all my posts if you want) put a single hint of doubt who is responsible for the war. Just ask yourself about differences between your and our war. You must admit these are two separate wars, because when we were bleeding and it could help a lot if any disturbances or riots occured in Serbia (which included Kosovo those days) while most of their army was in Croatia and Bosnia, Kosovar people suddenly became calm (unexpectedly, after '81, '88...) and waited what will happen to us. When war finally started in Kosovo, the USA army almost immidiately appeared to help you. And what help did we get? Even when we had a chance to help Vukovar or make some other actions to save our people, we were stopped be European watchers in white suits. And since Croatia had finally succeeded to gain freedom, our people have been prosecuted in Hague because they dared to ignore threads of all those negotiators and peacemakers who let Vukovar, Srebrenica, Skabrnja, Dubrovnik, Gorazde, Erdut etc. to happen. We were paying for years during occupation and war, and we are paying again.

And your Macedonian episode is no more laudable than Croatian adventure in Middle Bosnia. We can't be proud of doing that to another country who was in position not much or any better than our own.

reply

Of course it all truely happend.

Bad & over-romantic beginning (why is Sarah wearing shabby clothes (in the tv-room scene)?), good film after-all. 7,5/10

reply

"Chetnik propaganda? Is that something President Truman overlooked in 1948. when he awarded a star to Chetnik General D. Mihailovic for saving 500 lifes of American pilots in the WWII?"

I don't think american pilots had anything to do with that medal. It was a pure political move. Think about it. Awarding a star 3 years after the war and two years after Mihailovic was executed by the communists.


"they have always faught on the agressor's side"

except from 1990-1995...haha...no, really, this got me laughing. Most of the partisans in WWII were Croats or Slovenians and that's because they couldn't stand a marionette country like "NDH" which was entirely submitted to the Italians. However, there were absolutely no partisans in Serbia until 1944 when the outcome of the war became obvious. Until then there were only Chetniks who, by the way, didn't hesitate to collaborate with the Germans and Ustashas (especially in Bosnia)


"they killed king of Yugoslavia because he was a Serb"

He was killed because he was a tyrant, and tyrants occasionally end up like that. Nationality was a factor, but it wasn't of greater significance.


"they built concentration camps (Jasenovac and Gradiska) for Jews and Serbs"

Did any Croat here state otherwise? No. Thats because it actually happened, and that's one part of history we're ashamed of.


"committed genocide against 300 thousand Serbs in 1995"

now this is friggin funny...either you people are making it up or our army is more powerful than American. I doubt it's the second option. It's true, war crimes did occur and they should be severely punished, but even a lunatic like Hitler with all his gas chambers couldn't kill so many people in a few days.


"To see Croatian Army in their full power and "glory", visit a few web sites"

Like I stated earlier, that's a part of our past that we regret, as should you regret what you did in Croatia and Bosnia.


Oh and by the way, I saw the Milosevic trial...I don't understand how could you let that clown lead your country? I quote: "We didn't bomb Dubrovnik, the Croats burned tires in the city to make it appear as if they were bombed."

And to reffer to robynouse's post, which is true, you didn't spend your childhood in a bomb-shelter like I did. You never feared of foreign army 3kms away from your house. It's easy to write nonsense, but it's hard to accept the truth: Your army destroyed a part of my and countless other lives.

reply

srpsko sarajevo, boris i ostali.. Vi niste pola djetinjstva proveli u podrumima bez struje, bez vode, i niste bili tjednima bez danjeg svijetla jer ste se morali skrivati pod zemlju od granata... I zato nemojte pričati gluposti i stavljati postove kakve stavljate. Možete se sramiti svojih riječi! "srpsko sarajevo" kako te sram nije takvo ime napisati...

Sorry to all of you who don't understand what I wrote, but I had tears in my eye when reading some of post here... I am from Skabrnja, it is a smaler place than Vukovar, but the same tragedy and... I hope you understand...

This movie is true and realistic, but the terror can't be truly understood, without seeing it...

reply

[deleted]

Bloody wars are usually lost by all participants, whoever the proclaimed winner/s.

By that token, if actual participants in a war (to make it simple, two feuding countries) lose anyway because of warfare, would anyone then take a guess at which party (not quite in the sense of a political party) then picks up the pieces and gets the most profit out of that in the longer term? Who benefits the most? Who's interests are being served in the longer run (not just 5-10 years, but more)? In the bigger picture?

Famously, a Chinese Prime Minister of 1970's, Zhao En-Lai, when asked in 1972 about what he thought of the French Revolution and its aftermath, he then said: "Well, it's too early to tell.".

I've been doing some research into the topic of war, so I have a few buckets of information for y'all.

The span of living memory is longer than ever before.

For example, most veterans of the First World War who died in 2006 (this year is not over yet and some people are likely to survive past that) were between 106 and 110 years old.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veterans_of_the_First_World_War_who_died_in_2006

I noticed in one of the news that one of the last surviving widows of the U.S. Civil War died recently and one was still alive.
http://www.brotherswar.com/Perspective-10.htm
Also, search Google with these terms /without external quotes:
"last surviving of "civil war" america OR american OR U.S. widows OR widow"
/I added the search terms only, as the search results URL would be too long for this forum and would thus distort the layout.

Considering all that /the span of lives and living memory, the 200+ years that have passed the time of the French Revolution is not really a very long time at all. I remember I read an article on www.cbc.ca about a Hundred-Year-Old War, which was when the English invaded France to perform regime change and get their hands on France's wine. The effects of this can be measured and assessed more-or-less accurately just 550 years after the fact. Yes, we don't quite know everything about this, but a war over something so trivial today as wine lead to developments in weapons technology (as every such war does, such as the French then using heavy artillery for the first time) and had its effects on politics and society centuries later.

A classical and oversimplified understanding of war is one between two countries, but my reasoning (which, according to Wikipedia, seems to follow one of the schools of war/social philosophy/theory) is that it's usually more than just the two countries having a feud between each other and that wars are also caused by different (sometimes even unholy) alliances and organisations. Either for the cause of getting to power or getting resources or both.

There's always a reason (for war and conflict) and I think war is one of those things that is not made 'just for fun'. If you look at the first episodes of the "Star Wars" saga, the warring parties were directly meddled with by one or more outside entities, in this case, ultimately the Sith and leading up to that all the greedy aliens and Palpatine's minions, who slowly, going with some flow of sorts, upped Palpatine's position and (mental) state to such that he couldn't return to normal anymore. In the end, unable to help it and thus, accepting his fate, becoming who he became and who he was up until the end..

ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War

reply

[deleted]

I WAS THERE AND SAW IT WITH MY OWN EYES - and in a simple sentance, the Croats were heavily out numbered and butchered by serbian cetniks. Can i please also say there were soldiers with serbian background who grew up in Vukovar who fought against these extreemists along side the Croats, these villiagers knew the true story - dont try to cover it up, simply learn from it.

reply

...and these Serbs in Croatian army were not a few isolated exceptions; but if chetnick forces captured them, the torture was even more extreme than what they did to Croats. And those Serbs were not only local population, but came from all over the Croatia defending their attacked bleeding country.

reply

n_sulentic: "Even if war crimes were commited against serbs in Croatia, they got what they deserved, those who think it unjust stay out of my country, we're doing fine without you. "

Your just making it more obvious that Ante Gotovina deserves an indictment or even the death penalty along with any other croatian paramilitary leader.

n_sulentic: "Croatian people must not ever forget what the Serbs did to them."

But you would have a fit if the serbs never forgot what the croats did to them.

See, croat and serb nationalists all sound the same and say the exact same crap that sticks up for their side and puts the other side down, but at the same time contradicting themselves and making themselves look like terrible people. Ustase and Cetnik are the same, just a different flag. they all have no remorse for killing innocent civilians, dont listen to ANY yugo nationalist, they all have the same goal.....a greater, ethnically clean country.

This movie is false because it shows the ustasi as heroes, although the atrocities commited by the serb paramilitaries or "cetniks" is acurately portrayed, the usatsi were in no way in any situtation in any point in history, heroes to anyone besides other croatian nationalists that supported ethnic cleansing of croatia's minorties. Croats will say no, ustase protected us from serb nationalists, then serbs say no, cetniks protected us from croat nationalists. It such bullsh*t!!! will there ever be peace in the former Jugoslavija??

reply

[deleted]

"Please don't come onto this forum " ?????

Is this democracy in modern Croatian way?

And is this a special politeness when you say "please"? (Becka skola?)

reply

[deleted]

Lijepo je biti pristojan, ali pristojno je i slusati tudje misli, slagali se s njima ili ne. Neki nam otvaraju oci, nekima mi otvorimo oci, a ako smo i dalje na suprotnim stranama, bar znamo s kime imamo posla.

(I answered n_sulentic that it's O.K. to be polite, but being decent also includes hearing what others have to say - either to provide or to get information, to change our or other people's attitudes, or at least to recognize who are the people that don't want to listen, and make conclusions according to that.)

reply

Though there is sense in your words, it's a logic from people who 1) never undestood what was really going on, 2) don't know and don't check the facts, 3) believe in stereotypes presented by people who had and still have their own interests.

n_sulentic answered you correctly about Gotovina. Croatia had been recognized and an UN member for 3 years, so how could a regular army be "paramilitar"?

If he were Ustasha, I would agree with you, because Ustashas were a terrorist group before WWII, nazi servants during WWII, and terrorists after WWII. But he was a general of an official army, defending his own country. Of course, if he was doing it in Iraq, Grenada, Vietnam, Panama, Afghanistan etc he would be a hero praised all over the USA and its collonies- oops, sorry: globalized friendly countries.

Last years, unfortunately, a number of people admiring and accepting Ustasha ideology rapidly grows. It is ironic that it was not the war that caused such a trend, but a Haague court and Carla del Ponte. We all know that some of Croats accused in Haague didn't deserve any better, and there are more of them that should be doing their time, but things went out of control and out of mind when not only legal military leaders had been accused, but even the war for freedom was entitled a criminal action. We can remember some criminal actions in 1776, not to mention 50's and 60's when all those African and many Asian countries criminally expelled English, Dutch, French and Belgian forces. And what about crime that happened when that same Belgians and Dutch some centuries before dispossessed their foreign rulers? So, thanks to attitudes like your, we really do have increase of Ustasha fans in Croatia.

Also, where did you see "ustasi as heroes" in this movie? I haven't seen a single one, neither a hero nor a criminal. Maybe you missed them. But it's a reality: in 1991., when movie happens, there were no ustashas, in Vukovar or anywhere else in Croatia. You don't believe? Look at all that photos and TV reports made by foreign, independent reporters, often very averse to Croatia. Have there been any ustashas? And what about chetniks?

Besides that, I agree with things you say. Ustasha and chetnik ideology is similar, equal, coherent. Digging the past can't lead us forward. If only Europe and USA understood this, and once for good decided who started the war, found and convicted the inducers. If they do it, all those who did crimes that were caused by the inducers' activities could and should be prosecuted. Till then evertyhing looks as if someone would say that 1939. was equal to 1945., and French ressistance, Greek partisans, Polish, Romanian and all others who were fighting for freedom (and Yugoslav partisans as well) had no more right to do it than Hitler and Mussolini had right to attack and enslave them. So de Gaule would be in Nürnberg seat to seat with Göring, because some Germans were killed in Alsace and some houses might have been burnt in Saarland.

reply

thats cool, but all I was trying to say is that after reading a book about the atrocities at jasenovac and seeing movies like Savior, hearing n_sulentic say if any atrocities were commited on non-croats then they deserved it, just shows to that the mind state of those old ustasas of world war 2 is still alive and well today and that Savior was an acurate movie. nationalists are detrimental to the balkans and I dont care if you dont beleive peace is possible because im croatian and serbian and i DO beleive in peace. I am still convinced after this little conversation that croats and serbs all say the same bullsh*t using little analogies to justify their own sides' actions. You guys all use the same arguments against eachother. as long as serbs deny their part and croats deny theirs, there never will be peace. Of course croatia has always been fighting for independance no one is arguing with that, it is the matter in which they had been fighting for it that is questionable. Bottom line is that if n_sulentic didnt say that comment i wouldnt have posted anything negative toward croats because i am part croatian and i love my people and country but because i am also serbian it sickens me to hear my own people speak of violence like this, so i would say the same to a serb.

BTW what I said about gotovina isnt necesarily what I beleive but when you say stuff like that you make it sound like he is guilty.

reply

It's more or less O.K. what you say, ustasha and chetnik way of thinking is the same. They do no care about facts, unless the facts prove their ideas. Jasenovac is a great example: it is a fact that the campus existed (but some croatian nationalists deny it), and chetniks use this fact as much as possible, but they use communists version that 700000 people were killed there, and completely ignore scientists which prove it is impossible, and most researches say (even non-radical Serbs agree with that) the number of dead was between 70000 and 100000. Many croatian nationalists say that if any killings happened in Jasenovac, those bodies were communists victims shot after WWII - and that is ridiculous, because communists never bothered to make collections of the victims on one place, they were killing them immidiately all over the country. (Real ustashas don't deny killing Serbs, they are only sorry that any of them survived - the same that real chetniks feel about Croats.)

But it seems you are caught in a trap that (west) Europe made when last war started. They say everyone is guilty and noone is telling the truth. Sorry, but SOME truth must exist. Yes, both sides make certain amount of crimes that have to be prosecuted. But still there is a truth existing, you can't ignore everything that people say only because some members of their nations were terrorists and criminals. I can't accept that English or American, Dutch, Zimbabwean or whoever else that has never lived in Yugoslavia can teach others what is the truth, what has been going on here. They have their interrests, and it's all they care about.

reply

Yes Don, but the thing many people don’t understand is that while everyone is condemning the Balkans for being full of Croatian ustasa and Serbian cetniks, the outside world is doing nothing to promote peace in the region. Or at least it doesn’t look like it.

Many Croatians want to put the ustasa past behind them, and same with the serbs and cetniks, but for example, the ITCY is not helping settle nationalistic feelings in the region by chasing down national heros like Ante Gotovina. The people of Croatia want their general back, to be free, but what does the international community and Carla del Ponte care? As long as she sentences some guys from the war, her job is done. And now how are people from Croatia supposed to feel, nothing other than cheated. And of course some Croats feel like they felt in bivse Jugoslavia, where they were told what to think and how to do things, it’s the same thing except its not the serbs in control, it’s the UN or EU that closed negotiations with Croatia because Gotovina wasn’t yet captured.

reply

Bravo! well said. It is sad, the western powers put tito in power which is the reason the bloody mess happened in the first place and now they make things worse by taking responsibility of persecuting serbs and croats, while they didn't even really do sh*t to help during the conflict.
And yeah przgzr Its sad that some serbs use jasenovac as a focal point for nationalism, the same as some bosnians use srebrenica as a focal point for nationalism when these events should be used to provoke peace. The jews didnt start mass murdering germans after ww2, but then again their battle was over while the recent yugoslav war was like the finishing touch of ww2 in yugoslavia, it is like tito and communism just paused the fighting and when he died it became unpaused so its like everything was the same as before but it just involved newer generations, but it was kinda like different battles of the same war..sort of. It just sucks that we still argue about it today when you'd think it was finally over and done with in 95, but then AGAIN when you have enemies living with eachother for 45 years there is still love AND hate and a deep connection between them that makes it even harder to get over. its f-ed up the recent yugoslav wars have a very deep psychological impact on us. this is what happens when enemies are forced to live amongst eachother for a long period of time.
But anyways, there are still alot of ustasas and cetniks fans today (90% of the serbs I know are hardcore cetnik supporters) and there will probably always be, which is why things probably wont get any better than they are today, it is just hard for me to accept because I am serbian, croatian and macedonian and I was never really taught that there are any differences between any of them.

reply

Every single letter and every single comma... I can agree with everything you say this time. And raising number of nationalists is the consequence of frustrations these nations are going through. As you say, hate has been hidden but not vanishing, problems have been put under the carpet. Communist peace was effective, but it was made just to keep Party on the top and no problems have been solved, they were not let be mentioned at all. So, all the nations felt cheated and depraved. And during those 40 years (not 45, because hate had been rather open few years before arms were taken out) new generations were frustrated by poverty, lack of democracy and lack of freedom for religions; and older generations were still alive with memories of war and post-war crimes that had never been adequately prosecuted - so the hate grew like an avalanche.

And now we have Haague court, European community and all the other wise and politically correct people from the West who play roles of Tito and Communist party - they try to make us love each other as if nothing had happened, but are prosecuting members of all nations just for being there, trying to make a balance - just like communists did in '45 and later. And people of these nations finally found this similarity. So, as we all know how "popular" have the communists been, and what happened in the end, we can understand why are people giving up the Europe idea (pro-European percentage is geting lower and lower), and what has been offered instead? A very good field for ustashas and chetniks to put their seeds of hate. And I just can't get it that all those "wise" world leaders don't see it. Or is it that they do it on purpose, because they want us to keep fighting? Divide et impera...

reply

I was thinking the same thing, it seems they want us to keep fighting and they want the balkans to remain unstable, there are probably a million conspiracy theories about this out there and Im sure some aren't too far fetched.

reply

I am a Serb and I live in Sweden, and i do not denie what my people have done. Like Srebenica or Arkans Tigers. But what i get upset about is how the west lookes away from what Croats and Bosnians have done. Everyone knows that Serbs commited ethnic cleansing, and so on, but if you say that the Croats and Bosnians did it as well, then everyone says that, that has never happend or that they had a reason to do it. Everyone talks about how bad Arkans Tigers was, well lets not forget about the Bosnian muslim military platon called Mujahedin. Muslims from all over the world, fighting for the Bosnians commited ethnic cleansing on Serbs and even Croatians. They could even kill their own people if they didint belive in "Allah" as much as them. And let's not forget that the Croats and the Bosnians also have foughted eachother. The Serbs did not blow up the bridge in Mostar for example, the Croats did.

reply

Do you think that we aren't ashamed because of Mostar bridge and some other mistakes and crimes? Maybe not all of us, but that's because the world, unlike you say, still refuses to give the final answer to the questions that you should also answer to yourself:

1. Who started the war, who controlled the army that was supposed to defend every citizen of then still existing Yugoslavia?

2. Where did all the battles take place?

3. How many Serbs were killed in Serbia (by Croats and Bosnians), and how many Croats and Bosinans were killed (by Serbs) in Croatia and Bosnia?

4. How many times have Serbian people in Belgrade, Nis, Subotica, Vranje run to their cellars because of air raid sirens, how many days and months did they have to stay there because of minethrowers and sharpshooters from neighbour street or village?

There is no war that only one side did all the bad things. But every war has one side that started the war and made the beasts on all sides free to do the slaughters.

Some people would never do what they did if it wasn't for saving their lives, home, families. Some people would, because they are monsters and kill people in war or peace. But we will never know for sure, because someone started the war and this chain reaction.

reply

Yes we started the war, and i do not denie this, or the ethnic cleansing and so on, but lets not forget that you threw us out of you country and cities before the war because you wanted to become independent. You didn't mention Mujahedin in your reply wich I wrote. Is this because you haven't heard of them or is it because you don't want to admit that there were more than just Arkan that commited ethnic cleansing. The killed your people to. Have you ever seen the film Savior. If you did, then you can not like this movie becasue this film shows the crualty of al sides. First serbians, then bosnians and the croatians. I love this film, and it is my favorite film about the war in Yugo becasue it shows as I said the cruelty of all sides, and not just about one side, like Harrisons Flowers. Today where I live, that is Sweden, people from ex-Yugo come togheter and goes to Balkanparties, when Seka Aleksic, Mile Kitic or any other artist com to us. Today we look at eachother and sees no difference. We have forgoten abot what happend, and we are friends. I myself have good bosnian an croatian friends. I just get upset when i read this. Nothing bad about Bosnia and Croatia, only about Serbia. WSerbia started the war yes, but no one of us on balkan has been inocent in this war. Serbians, have bad guys like, Milosevic, Arkan, Karadzic and Mladic. Croatians have Franjo Tudjman and Ante Gotovina. And bosnians have Alija Izetbegovic and as i said Mujahedin

reply

Mujahedins are a part of much bigger problem than Balkan wars. This is now shown maybe better than ever after the absurd Danish pictures situation.

I have relatives Serbs. I have myself some percentage of Serbian genes. I have some friends and neighbours that are Serbs. None of them had left their homes, none of them took arms agaist their homeland. Oh, I must correct myself, some, however, left their homes in Vukovar, Sarajevo, Foca trying to save their lives ane famielies when Serbian army occupied their hometowns. Some survived concentration camps, tortured even more than Croats and Moslems, because they were considered to be traitors.

There are no guilty nations and no innocent nations. There are no responsibilities when we talk about nations, that's what others want to make us believe, make us hate each other and feel ashamed in the same time, so they can rule and we, being guilty, have to obey.

But your examples are wrong. Tudjman was not a bad guy of Milosevic or Mladic type, but he was surrounded by wrong and sometimes incredibly stupid people. These people were also not dangerous except for being stupid, but again human stupidity was shown to be pernicious. Their comments about Croatian flags on mountains that had never been Croatian, Croatian soldiers on rivers where they never should have been imagined, about genetical inferiority of certain nations etc. could have disturbed Serbs. But on the other hand, Serbs still had Socialist party and a couple of new nationalist Serbian parties have been formed, and a great number od Croats had Serbian wives and husbands, sons- and daughters-in-law... The danger existed, but not that big.

And Serbs are not supposed to be cowards. So the big majority stayed where they had their homes. I believe those who left did it on purpose to be used as examples Milosevic needed to make a show and get an excuse for war.

And in 1995. Serbes left without being expelled. After first signs of Croatian attack Serbian local leaders ordered their populations to leave and organized the big exodus. Cowards? No, not again. They tried to make impression on western countries as if they were innocent victims; but it was not 1991. any more, and the plan failed. When Gotovina arrived everything was empty, so what could he be guilty for? Those who should really be prosecuted mostly stayed out of public. And I've never denied that they existed, or that some things happened that are a big dark spot on our history. Maybe even not the fact that they happened, because people kill each other all over the world in war and peace, but the fact they stayed unprosecuted, often hidden. This is a darker spot than 1941.-1945. (though the number of victims was now rather small compared to WWII), because anyone who knows a bit history can only laugh at Croatian "independence" and the ustasha's ability to do or decide anything without order or permission from above. After 1991. Croatia was responsible and free to decide what to do. Someone seems to have protected those criminals. But, also, you must admit that Milosevic, Babic and Mladic helped them a lot. In cellars and shelters Croatian people didn't have informations, and no will to think about it. They only wanted to survive.

reply

[deleted]

Yea, it's a real as Dawn of The Dead and Behind enemy Lines combined.

Pure propaganda!

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

Oh, come on, both sides should hide some of their songs that no human ear ever hear them again. And instead of that both sides keep them as a "tradition" and resurrect them whenever there is a good occasion.

On the other hand, the former poster's jokes (or whatever he thought he was sending) were out of place and out of mind.

reply

[deleted]