MovieChat Forums > Oklahoma! (2003) Discussion > Singing: live or dubbed?

Singing: live or dubbed?


Was the audio for the singing (especially Jackman) recorded live or dubbed in later? I'm just wondering.

Thanks!

reply

It was dubbed. I'm really sensitive to lip syncing, and though it was one of the best sync jobs I've ever seen, it was clearly synced. I don't know whether the audio or the video came first.

Edward

reply

The singing was almost certainly recorded first (just as in a musical film).

reply

Yes, the singing was pre-recorded and the actors had to lipsynch the songs. Dialogue was recorded whilst they were filming and this had its own problems (see http://www.kodak.com/US/plugins/acrobat/en/motion/newsletters/inCamera /oct99/oklahoma.pdf).

Filming was over 18 days between the end of the run at the National Theatre and the transfer to the West End. The live audience footage was recorded at an extra performance at the Olivier Theatre. You can read more about it in Maureen Lipman's book, Lipreading and also at http://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/episodes/rodgers-hammersteins-oklahoma/i ntroduction/113/

reply

Very interesting. Thanks for posting the links.

Edward

reply

The 2012 Les Miserables is sung live on set. It's quite revolutionary.

reply

So was "Paint Your Wagon" around 1969.

reply

In contrast, Les Miserables was sung-through, where there were hardly any spoken dialog in a span of two-and-a-half hours of storytelling. Recitatives ( sung dialogs) were sung together with solos, duets, and ensemble songs. It would have been impractical to record that entire musical score and then lipsynch during filming.

Unlike in Paint Your Wagon, which was more of a traditional movie musical - the storytelling was a combination of general spoken dialog and the occasional songs.

reply

It was obviously dubbed on a set (not in a theatre) with no audience. They all did well, but it is a gyp. Phony as a three-dollar bill.

reply